FA+
Shop
1260
Views
Views
18
Favorites
Favorites
Category
All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 616 x 864
File Size 98.3 kB
Report this content
More from AlexSpastic
Listed in Folders
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCdJjTDoAT0
Years ago a great evil was exposed about the Catholic Church. A wonderful movie called "Spotlight" was made about it. This movie is on Netflix now and I suggest you watch it if you can. It isn't a story just about how the Catholic Church covered up the attacks on children but rather how everyone covered it up. This includes the very paper that eventually broke the story.
Now the same evil threatens the children of Britain but it's magnitude is far greater. The cover up is actually the very police offering their own children to demons. They attack those who seek to open this evil into the sunlight. Are the police doing this on their own?
Why?
I am sure many of you are aware of the "hate crimes," people who the police go after ferociously because someone got offended.
Tommy Robinson has been arrested and has been moved to another prison. The video he made where he predicted..."that he wouldn't be around much longer" has been scrubbed from the internet. Many U-tube contributors have been removed or given strikes without explanation.
Censorship in the UK and in Europe is in full swing and many in the UK have declared their country is a police state.
I want you to pay attention to who is speaking about this and who is not. Why is there a movie about one group of pedophiles made, only to be followed by silence when the same crime happens now? The silence of this story tells you one thing...it can happen in America.
Years ago a great evil was exposed about the Catholic Church. A wonderful movie called "Spotlight" was made about it. This movie is on Netflix now and I suggest you watch it if you can. It isn't a story just about how the Catholic Church covered up the attacks on children but rather how everyone covered it up. This includes the very paper that eventually broke the story.
Now the same evil threatens the children of Britain but it's magnitude is far greater. The cover up is actually the very police offering their own children to demons. They attack those who seek to open this evil into the sunlight. Are the police doing this on their own?
Why?
I am sure many of you are aware of the "hate crimes," people who the police go after ferociously because someone got offended.
Tommy Robinson has been arrested and has been moved to another prison. The video he made where he predicted..."that he wouldn't be around much longer" has been scrubbed from the internet. Many U-tube contributors have been removed or given strikes without explanation.
Censorship in the UK and in Europe is in full swing and many in the UK have declared their country is a police state.
I want you to pay attention to who is speaking about this and who is not. Why is there a movie about one group of pedophiles made, only to be followed by silence when the same crime happens now? The silence of this story tells you one thing...it can happen in America.
Category All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 616 x 864px
File Size 98.3 kB
Listed in Folders
History repeats itself, for 'Humanity' has such a very, very short memory.
Government doing what it does for it's own reasons, becoming a tyranny and the populace suffers for it is not a new story. Only the dates on the calendar change to mark the latest chapter.
"The People."
Two extremely important words.
Sadly, "The People" are humans, and as already mentioned, 'Humanity has a very, very short memory'.
I do not trust my government to pick it's own nose(s). There is literally nothing it has done, for many decades now, that merits trust.
That brings it all back full circle:
"The People."
Society has become too lax. Too dependent on it's needs being provided by others. 'Industry'. The Almighty DOLLAR! Hell yeah, ye fellow Capitalists!
America is not 'The Land of the Free'. In Truth, it never was. Nice concept though.
I've no answers to the issues you've presented Alex.
Except to say-
"Do Unto Others, as You Would Have Done Unto You." (No, I am not Xtian, but I've never found fault with that sentiment).
You have to add to it, however-
"Don't Tread On Me (for I will end your ass if you do)".
'Nuff said?
I worry for Mr. Robinson (and so many others).
Government doing what it does for it's own reasons, becoming a tyranny and the populace suffers for it is not a new story. Only the dates on the calendar change to mark the latest chapter.
"The People."
Two extremely important words.
Sadly, "The People" are humans, and as already mentioned, 'Humanity has a very, very short memory'.
I do not trust my government to pick it's own nose(s). There is literally nothing it has done, for many decades now, that merits trust.
That brings it all back full circle:
"The People."
Society has become too lax. Too dependent on it's needs being provided by others. 'Industry'. The Almighty DOLLAR! Hell yeah, ye fellow Capitalists!
America is not 'The Land of the Free'. In Truth, it never was. Nice concept though.
I've no answers to the issues you've presented Alex.
Except to say-
"Do Unto Others, as You Would Have Done Unto You." (No, I am not Xtian, but I've never found fault with that sentiment).
You have to add to it, however-
"Don't Tread On Me (for I will end your ass if you do)".
'Nuff said?
I worry for Mr. Robinson (and so many others).
Yep. I fully expect artists will start getting 'warnings' here for supporting Tommy Robinson.
The 'Brain Trust' has decided to circle its wagons and defend their ideas until everyone else's death.
I've been sharing that advice for several years, "Listen to what's said, listen to what is left out. Who benefits?"
The 'Brain Trust' has decided to circle its wagons and defend their ideas until everyone else's death.
I've been sharing that advice for several years, "Listen to what's said, listen to what is left out. Who benefits?"
This disease going on isn't going to end easily but it will end. Italy and several other countries are making moves to end the replacement migration going on. There isn't enough money to offer free living and I hope people will wake up. I actual saw a "polygamy" website in the UK as if now society will pay for dozens of children that come of it.
This reminds me of something involving the church here in Canada.a very famous priest who was a lawyer became very popular in the media for being in charge of making settlements, on behalf of individuals claiming they were molested by members of the church and it being covered up he had some name in the media and became famous for handing out settlements. Instead of trying to cover things up and he was basically a big black eye for the Vatican and the church in general.
Here's where things get weird and interesting .ok hes traveling through Canada a few years ago and at the airport is( randomly selected from several hundred individuals ) if you can believe the quote random part too have his laptops searched by border security at the year port.now on any given day. They have hundreds if not thousands of people with laptops passed through security without being checked.now , according to police records. Upon turning on his device it was overloaded with illegal porn material I'm sure you know what I mean. Without getting into more detail.u ever hear of something being rather suspicious because there's too much evidence????? how many cases have you heard of somebody having illegal material on a laptop that just magically pops right up on the screen when you turn the device on and click on something?????its right there on the desktop and everything clearly marked and visible. Am I the only person that found that by itself rather unusual???this guy cost the church millions, if not hundreds of millions in a very short time Which made him very famous in the media.now i myself immediately thought well maybe the guy was a guilty little deviant and felt bad so he was handing out settlements but on the other hand admittedly part of me thinks it's kind of dubious that he was selected and searched but furthermore, the way the evidence was found. I've never heard of anybody having that kind of thing in plain sight. People in general that have adult material on a mobile device usually have it packed away to some extent in a folder somewheres. It's not right out on the desktop. Clearly, Merck. What the subject matter is or popping up on the screen when you turn the thing on.if it had been specifically stated that they had to do some digging to find it but it was right in the initial press release that the evidence was clearly visible and they didn't require a warrant or anything to find it. They were basically using the plain sight clause, which meant they didn't have to have a warrant to justify a deep search of his laptop. Generally, when they find something like I'm talking about. It's when they spend a significant amount of time poking around and usually have to get passwords or something or get a warrant to have a technician do the search. It's not very often just some border gird nobody pushing buttons and boom, it's right there. Stop the church covered up here in Canada is just unbelievable and too set somebody up like this is not unheard of either where he personally cost them large sums of money and made the church look bad. He was part of investigations, bringing evidence forth and so on.he was literally working with police to uncover cases that were covered up by the church.
Here's where things get weird and interesting .ok hes traveling through Canada a few years ago and at the airport is( randomly selected from several hundred individuals ) if you can believe the quote random part too have his laptops searched by border security at the year port.now on any given day. They have hundreds if not thousands of people with laptops passed through security without being checked.now , according to police records. Upon turning on his device it was overloaded with illegal porn material I'm sure you know what I mean. Without getting into more detail.u ever hear of something being rather suspicious because there's too much evidence????? how many cases have you heard of somebody having illegal material on a laptop that just magically pops right up on the screen when you turn the device on and click on something?????its right there on the desktop and everything clearly marked and visible. Am I the only person that found that by itself rather unusual???this guy cost the church millions, if not hundreds of millions in a very short time Which made him very famous in the media.now i myself immediately thought well maybe the guy was a guilty little deviant and felt bad so he was handing out settlements but on the other hand admittedly part of me thinks it's kind of dubious that he was selected and searched but furthermore, the way the evidence was found. I've never heard of anybody having that kind of thing in plain sight. People in general that have adult material on a mobile device usually have it packed away to some extent in a folder somewheres. It's not right out on the desktop. Clearly, Merck. What the subject matter is or popping up on the screen when you turn the thing on.if it had been specifically stated that they had to do some digging to find it but it was right in the initial press release that the evidence was clearly visible and they didn't require a warrant or anything to find it. They were basically using the plain sight clause, which meant they didn't have to have a warrant to justify a deep search of his laptop. Generally, when they find something like I'm talking about. It's when they spend a significant amount of time poking around and usually have to get passwords or something or get a warrant to have a technician do the search. It's not very often just some border gird nobody pushing buttons and boom, it's right there. Stop the church covered up here in Canada is just unbelievable and too set somebody up like this is not unheard of either where he personally cost them large sums of money and made the church look bad. He was part of investigations, bringing evidence forth and so on.he was literally working with police to uncover cases that were covered up by the church.
in that case proving his innocence would be easy enough, just check the illegal porn folder to find out when it was created, if it was created while he was at the airport or shortly before then it would prove it was planted in there by a hacker, a decent defense attorney shouldn't even break a sweat proving that.
you really don't want me to make a list of stuff that's been done do you? Here's one case I'm going to mention as an example a high profile lawyer who was known for representing drug dealers and getting cases thrown out involving very high-profile criminals was charged and arrested for possession of child porn. Some years ago he lost everything and lost his license to practice law and so forth.the case was pretty quickly thrown out of court after it actually made it. As for as being seen by a judge.the evidence was Psalm family photos of a trip to Florida or something like that of his kids i swimwear and from what I understand some pages from a flyer for a store.the hole case was bs but by the time it made it in front of a judge the damage had Artie been done. The media pretty much ignored the fact the case got thrown out of court .he was found guilty in the eyes of the media long before it ever made it to court and he could change the fact that he was screwed.
even is this guy managed to have been set up by a bird that wasn't smart enough to sat up a history along with the pictures its a case that there are generally very little investigation done. You'd be surprised how money people that are cot with child pornography on a digital device. How little investigation beyond that point is done, you're pretty much automatically guilty no matter what you do it's one of the easiest convictions They have here in Canada.once it hit the newspapers back I was finished, no matter what. And they've barely did any further reporting. After that.the guy almost immediately resigned from the church. I think even before he was officially kicked out and the whole thing was basically forgotten about. Within a few days by the media.the guy i think almost immediately pled guilty to all charges, which is not uncommon. Like I said here in Canada, it's very difficult to fight that particular type of charge because there's almost no investigation ever done beyond. Look what we found your guilty. And that's basically it. Don't get me started about an incident with computer crime back in the 90s, where several Dozen innocent people went to jail and it was years before The truth was discovered.
That particular case was to do with money being stolen through the Internet from credit cards, banks, and so forth. All these people that were quickly charged and convicted based on almost no evidence other than digital records showing their computer was used for particular crimes.it turned out when they got a better cyber investigation department. Some years later that each of these individuals computer had been serviced at the same computer business and while their computer was in for servicing or sometime after it was returned to its owner that computer was then used to commit a series of online crimes cops just automatically assumed it was the owner of the machine back in the early days and did almost no investigating. The computer shop got away with this for nearly 10 years. If I are member. The story correctly
even is this guy managed to have been set up by a bird that wasn't smart enough to sat up a history along with the pictures its a case that there are generally very little investigation done. You'd be surprised how money people that are cot with child pornography on a digital device. How little investigation beyond that point is done, you're pretty much automatically guilty no matter what you do it's one of the easiest convictions They have here in Canada.once it hit the newspapers back I was finished, no matter what. And they've barely did any further reporting. After that.the guy almost immediately resigned from the church. I think even before he was officially kicked out and the whole thing was basically forgotten about. Within a few days by the media.the guy i think almost immediately pled guilty to all charges, which is not uncommon. Like I said here in Canada, it's very difficult to fight that particular type of charge because there's almost no investigation ever done beyond. Look what we found your guilty. And that's basically it. Don't get me started about an incident with computer crime back in the 90s, where several Dozen innocent people went to jail and it was years before The truth was discovered.
That particular case was to do with money being stolen through the Internet from credit cards, banks, and so forth. All these people that were quickly charged and convicted based on almost no evidence other than digital records showing their computer was used for particular crimes.it turned out when they got a better cyber investigation department. Some years later that each of these individuals computer had been serviced at the same computer business and while their computer was in for servicing or sometime after it was returned to its owner that computer was then used to commit a series of online crimes cops just automatically assumed it was the owner of the machine back in the early days and did almost no investigating. The computer shop got away with this for nearly 10 years. If I are member. The story correctly
I have been following the Tommy Robinson thing since the near beginning of his rise into internet culture. Him and all the things happening in the UK... FUCKED up. Who would have thought that such a turn would come about. It is my hope we can avoid that shit here in the U.S. At least we can have a claim on the freedom of speech as a fundamental right here.
Fuck you Alex, Sharia law is perfectly acceptable over western laws. You just need to get with the program and accept the facts , the western nations will be Muslim and nothing is going to stop it.
Til the Imams piss off the Chinese, then it's game over. Unlike the West, the Chinese do not fuck around.
Til the Imams piss off the Chinese, then it's game over. Unlike the West, the Chinese do not fuck around.
we don't have hate speech laws in America, in fact we have just the opposite, hate speech is protected because the people who founded our country knew that unpopular opinions shouldn't be shut down if they had any kind of merit to them. In addition to that rape and especially pedophilia are considered the worst crimes anyone can commit, even worse than murder to many people, even an accusation is enough for the public to consider them guilty (for all the good and bad that means.)
If you're truly of a mind to listen, you might find this worth considering.
The reason he was arrested wasn't because he dared speak ill of some Muslims, it was because he did it in a time and place which handed the defence grounds for a mistrial - possibly resulting in a repeat of the trial or even it being dismissed entirely.
Those paedophiles could have walked free because of his actions.
This is why, in this country, filming is not permitted in a courthouse. That's the key difference between his reporting and that of other news outlets. I have an idea it's the same in the states? Try setting up a camera in a courthouse while a trial is on and see how far the first amendment gets you!
As for the arrest and trial of Stephen Yaxley-Lennon (the actual name of "Tommy Robinson"), there are some offences in this country which do not require a jury trial. Again, I have an idea it's the same in the states.
His trial was public, many reporters were there, but because his offence directly related to the other trial which was then still ongoing they couldn't report on his trial until the other trial had concluded - again, for fear of handing the defence grounds for a mistrial.
It's easy to paint him as a martyr because he got arrested, but by his own admission he was breaking laws put in place to stop paedophiles walking free, and that isn't my idea of a hero.
The reason he was arrested wasn't because he dared speak ill of some Muslims, it was because he did it in a time and place which handed the defence grounds for a mistrial - possibly resulting in a repeat of the trial or even it being dismissed entirely.
Those paedophiles could have walked free because of his actions.
This is why, in this country, filming is not permitted in a courthouse. That's the key difference between his reporting and that of other news outlets. I have an idea it's the same in the states? Try setting up a camera in a courthouse while a trial is on and see how far the first amendment gets you!
As for the arrest and trial of Stephen Yaxley-Lennon (the actual name of "Tommy Robinson"), there are some offences in this country which do not require a jury trial. Again, I have an idea it's the same in the states.
His trial was public, many reporters were there, but because his offence directly related to the other trial which was then still ongoing they couldn't report on his trial until the other trial had concluded - again, for fear of handing the defence grounds for a mistrial.
It's easy to paint him as a martyr because he got arrested, but by his own admission he was breaking laws put in place to stop paedophiles walking free, and that isn't my idea of a hero.
Did you happen to look at the video I posted? The police didn't look the other way to Muslim pedo gangs, they defended them...I am having a hard time accepting that.
These "secret" trials, which is frankly what Tommy got, are something of a bad joke. His arrest was even censored even tho the rather swift trial was already concluded. He got a lengthy sentence for what...filming? Outside a courthouse? With the judge looking out a window laughing?
I understand a man who left a bacon sandwich outside a Mosque was killed in prison. If Tommy is killed in prison what then? "Well, he did film outside a courthouse."
Tommy is a journalist covering a trial where the criminals may have been aided by the state! I would say that the UK has a desperate need of journalists at this point because the the state is becoming a authoritarian nightmare.
https://youtu.be/5x3sRtJsKL0
These "secret" trials, which is frankly what Tommy got, are something of a bad joke. His arrest was even censored even tho the rather swift trial was already concluded. He got a lengthy sentence for what...filming? Outside a courthouse? With the judge looking out a window laughing?
I understand a man who left a bacon sandwich outside a Mosque was killed in prison. If Tommy is killed in prison what then? "Well, he did film outside a courthouse."
Tommy is a journalist covering a trial where the criminals may have been aided by the state! I would say that the UK has a desperate need of journalists at this point because the the state is becoming a authoritarian nightmare.
https://youtu.be/5x3sRtJsKL0
Dangerous posting here, but you really need to get the record straight. Tommy Robinson (whatever you call him) was literally trying to get pedophiles off scot-free.
He was warned that what he was doing was illegal, he was warned it could result in the victims not getting justice, we *know* he was warned because he referenced those warnings in his own videos as he filmed himself committing crimes. Also his own testimony at this trial (which we seem to know about, despite it being 'secret'); At his sentencing, Lennon admitted that his livestream could have stopped the trial of alleged groomers (which would have prevented any justice for the victims) and that he breached his suspended sentence. ( https://www.leeds-live.co.uk/news/l.....eport-14704946 )
Why would he commit crimes that would defend muslim pedophiles? Especially given that he hates Muslims? (I can say that, right? Hard to tell with the new political correctness rules from conservatives)? Well I don't know since i'm not a mind-reader, but here are some theories:
-He's an idiot who can't keep a single thought in his head. So he FORGOT the consequences of his actions. Seems unlikely since I have been assured he is a brilliant and wonderful leader.
-He's a sociopath who just wants attention and doesn't care how he gets it.
-He's a secret pedophile, trying to protect his pedo-brothers.
Or the most likely of all:
-He wanted the trial to fail, the pedophiles to escape justice, and to use the political backlash of that to spark more repressive anti-muslim laws and more violent anti-muslim protests/riots/criminal acts.
He doesn't care about the children who were victimized, only his hatred. THAT seems the most likely situation.
Anyway, he got excellent legal representation and a fair trial, but when you live-blog yourself committing a crime you were already convicted and essentially let off with a warning for...you ain't goin' nowhere. As for the "lengthy sentence"? 13 months doesn't seem that long, but it's hard for me to tell when a rich pedophile rapist gets 18 months, the man who turned him in gets 5 years, and a poor person who sells 31$ worth of weed gets 10.
Tommy Robinson is not a journalist, he's a lobbyist and a politician. You listen to his lies and the lies of his friends and mistake them for the truth. This error results in you promoting the very things you claim to be against, because you don't dig deeper or question your sources.
He was warned that what he was doing was illegal, he was warned it could result in the victims not getting justice, we *know* he was warned because he referenced those warnings in his own videos as he filmed himself committing crimes. Also his own testimony at this trial (which we seem to know about, despite it being 'secret'); At his sentencing, Lennon admitted that his livestream could have stopped the trial of alleged groomers (which would have prevented any justice for the victims) and that he breached his suspended sentence. ( https://www.leeds-live.co.uk/news/l.....eport-14704946 )
Why would he commit crimes that would defend muslim pedophiles? Especially given that he hates Muslims? (I can say that, right? Hard to tell with the new political correctness rules from conservatives)? Well I don't know since i'm not a mind-reader, but here are some theories:
-He's an idiot who can't keep a single thought in his head. So he FORGOT the consequences of his actions. Seems unlikely since I have been assured he is a brilliant and wonderful leader.
-He's a sociopath who just wants attention and doesn't care how he gets it.
-He's a secret pedophile, trying to protect his pedo-brothers.
Or the most likely of all:
-He wanted the trial to fail, the pedophiles to escape justice, and to use the political backlash of that to spark more repressive anti-muslim laws and more violent anti-muslim protests/riots/criminal acts.
He doesn't care about the children who were victimized, only his hatred. THAT seems the most likely situation.
Anyway, he got excellent legal representation and a fair trial, but when you live-blog yourself committing a crime you were already convicted and essentially let off with a warning for...you ain't goin' nowhere. As for the "lengthy sentence"? 13 months doesn't seem that long, but it's hard for me to tell when a rich pedophile rapist gets 18 months, the man who turned him in gets 5 years, and a poor person who sells 31$ worth of weed gets 10.
Tommy Robinson is not a journalist, he's a lobbyist and a politician. You listen to his lies and the lies of his friends and mistake them for the truth. This error results in you promoting the very things you claim to be against, because you don't dig deeper or question your sources.
No you didn't. Tommy Robinson tried to aid muslim pedophiles by breaking the law. He did what you're (baselessly) accusing the police of doing. Why are you defending that?
And he got a fairly-represented and publicly-reported trial. Why are you attacking that?
Tommy Robinson is not a journalist, he's a lobbyist and a politician. You listen to his lies and the lies of his friends and mistake them for the truth. This error results in you promoting the very things you claim to be against, because you don't dig deeper or question your sources.
And he got a fairly-represented and publicly-reported trial. Why are you attacking that?
Tommy Robinson is not a journalist, he's a lobbyist and a politician. You listen to his lies and the lies of his friends and mistake them for the truth. This error results in you promoting the very things you claim to be against, because you don't dig deeper or question your sources.
The judge put a censor on the "open" trial. In all honesty I don't give a crap about Leftist authoritarians. I don't care about their self serving rules. They attack good people and they never stand up to real evil.
Whine about racism, sexism, transgenderism, Islamophobia, and spew hatred about Capitalism but in the end all the little groups turn on one another and the country dies.
The video shows the government colluded with the rape gangs. So Tommy, someone who doesn't obey the laws yes, went to expose the truth. Britain has become 1984. I will watch the rot and take notes about how once again Leftists virtue signal to get power and then ruin everything.
Watch it all rot.
London is a SHIT HOLE!
They actually helped pedophile rape gangs...they have no rules.
There is nobody to blame except the Leftists because that is all that there is.
Whine about racism, sexism, transgenderism, Islamophobia, and spew hatred about Capitalism but in the end all the little groups turn on one another and the country dies.
The video shows the government colluded with the rape gangs. So Tommy, someone who doesn't obey the laws yes, went to expose the truth. Britain has become 1984. I will watch the rot and take notes about how once again Leftists virtue signal to get power and then ruin everything.
Watch it all rot.
London is a SHIT HOLE!
They actually helped pedophile rape gangs...they have no rules.
There is nobody to blame except the Leftists because that is all that there is.
Again, the only person who helped a pedophile rape gang was Tommy Robinson. Your video shows nothing but the empty words of a known liar. The same liar who tried to sabotage the trial.
If you want to convince me of police corruption, show me a source that isn't some douchebag on youtube talking. Show me actual evidence.
And again, why do you keep defending a man who tried to help muslim pedophiles?
If you want to convince me of police corruption, show me a source that isn't some douchebag on youtube talking. Show me actual evidence.
And again, why do you keep defending a man who tried to help muslim pedophiles?
Comments