
X(
Category All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1280 x 792px
File Size 205.1 kB
Oh no I'm not saying wars won't be deadlier just that it's different. The speed of war and the effectiveness of weapons will bring higher death tolls rather than blindly sending men into a meat grinder. I was talking about how there is much greater care taken into the preservation of forces nowadays (this also leads to a greater discouragement towards having big all out wars). I sincerely hope that we never have to test those theories though.
Brits, germans, americans, the countries that were on the front of WW1, the 'decent superpowers', even russia, Have shanged their ways and dont use the tactics or biological weapons in force. What i mean to aim at is limited and I mean the normal military side of it.
Deadlier, yes, far more deadly, humane, yes, far above what was expected after ww2.
Dictators are discuialified as I mean 'superpowers with inteligence'
Deadlier, yes, far more deadly, humane, yes, far above what was expected after ww2.
Dictators are discuialified as I mean 'superpowers with inteligence'
Lets be quite clear, its opinion, both you and me have it and it always is different FROM reality.
No one has the numbers, proof etc to say 'this military will throw themselves in the gunfire and this one doesnt'
What I think you are trying to tell is different from the initial opinion i gave.
Lets take this route, so you will understand what i tried to make clear.
WW1 military codes, and now the ones used in Irak. From being left to die in an artilarry created crater, to being provided every means of support and safe extraction. One life worth during the 20th century, and one life in the 21st. I hope you understand what i meant with the begin of my comment.
And aslong you arent a russian soldier, or me, there is no safe way to say 'You are so wrong' or 'you are so right'
Only during ww3 or some other war will show how different they act from ww1 and 2 to now
No one has the numbers, proof etc to say 'this military will throw themselves in the gunfire and this one doesnt'
What I think you are trying to tell is different from the initial opinion i gave.
Lets take this route, so you will understand what i tried to make clear.
WW1 military codes, and now the ones used in Irak. From being left to die in an artilarry created crater, to being provided every means of support and safe extraction. One life worth during the 20th century, and one life in the 21st. I hope you understand what i meant with the begin of my comment.
And aslong you arent a russian soldier, or me, there is no safe way to say 'You are so wrong' or 'you are so right'
Only during ww3 or some other war will show how different they act from ww1 and 2 to now
The battle was a major strike against both armies, as many of those who stood by their brothers were shot down like animals, slain like wild beasts. The many who were wounded were doomed as Medics were tasked with navigating across the battlefield to reach their bleeding comrade, which was more dangerous in itself.
Comments