*Sigh* What is with everyone and banning sets of words? I mean if you have to explain it to someone on what the law bans the law breaks itself.

Verbal stalking over someones private life is much more enforceable. And by Private I mean involvement between declaration of communication in which all parties involved to keep others uninvolved in their involvement of their interations.

In other words its allows people or pokemon to keep others out of their business as long as those people or pokemon keep others out of their business.
Can be countered by loud sex though.

It's just a matter of formality.

Basically to emphasize to people "this land has inter-species couples, to enter is to accept"

In short, if you don't like it but still come in and do/say something dumb, you're out.

My point being that it is not a long term rule. Just a few years after Chris's death the entire place may be drawn into chaos simply because someone as a different interpretation about the law. I know that some people think legacy is something invulnerable but it shows its cracks when other people start enterpetring it differently.

You can argue about it with everyone in history. Hell I think that Kingdoms proved that even families are meant to change overtime. Even when the rules are taught to everyone's children due to the simple fact that everyone has to deal with problems differently. And if that means bending a rule or two to keep your kids safe, the thought, "Lives over Law" becomes obvious, even if that means if someone tries to do the same without thinking.