Free speech doesn't protect someone who spews out nonsense that directly leads to events like pizzagate and the harassing of the parents of children who were killed by a gunman at their elementary school.

Taking alex jones down is not a front against free speech, it's the silencing of a voice that causes people who are not critically-minded to go do dangerous or criminal acts based on pure delusional fiction.

If I started asking everyone on furaffinity to say that you're an actor who just faked (heaven forbid) your parents dying by gun violence, or I told them that FA hq is at your workplace running a child sex-trafficking ring and touted the right to bear arms, and I gave people your address so that they could find you where you live to harass you, do you think that I'd be protected by free speech for putting you in danger and otherwise hindering your life?

Please do not be fooled. Free speech and unlimited speech are not the same.

Yes it does.

Whenever they talked about harassing parents, did they EVER show video proof? Because I have seen enough proof AGAINST that notion.

Pizzagate is an actual fact in which they used coding to talk about children. Lolita Express much?

And yes, you would be protected two fold. The Freedom to say such, and if you were charged for such, your right to a full and speedy trial by your peers.

To speak that you will cause HARM TO OTHERS, is not free speech. If someone was to say they were going to shoot up a school, I would call the cops and notify them.

And the greatest part of free speech and the exercise of it? I could choose to silence your post right now if I wanted to, but I wont. Even if I don't like it.

And yet you argue that egging on violent lunatics and making baseless accusations should be protected.

Against whom?

There is plenty of videos on the net that show Senators like Maxine Waters demanding that people in supporting the President be hassled, pushed around, and attacked.

There are video's showing congressmen demanding that independent news groups be taken off the net entirely.

That is dangerous, stopped and questioned into why.

You're just talking out of your ass. Show me where she says that we should attack, but specifically, physically. And I want you to use your brain on this one. Don't find a clip of the word "attack" being said by Waters. Understand the context, because the context of a non-violent person saying "attack" is far different from the context of a republican candidate for the presidency in 2015 suggests (note "suggests," not "said") that the "2nd amendment people" kill hillary. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/10/.....y-clinton.html I'm sure you remember when he said that the "2nd amendment people" could probably do something to clinton when nobody else could do anything civilized.

Don't you dare start arguing about context by denying your own ability to see what's in front of you. You'd just be a hypocrite anyway.

I'm not going to argue with you about whether the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting was a false-flag. That's ridiculous. Your desire for video proof should mean that everything you believe on faith and without video proof is sufficient, so you're just picking and choosing what you want to believe based on your own narrative for a worldview that seems more exciting to you than the reality that is at hand.

By the way, a "full and speedy trial" is hardly justice. Speedy? I think a civilized species would make damn sure that it's rightfully punishing a member of its own species for good reasons, or else we're still savages and beasts.

You could most certainly silence my posts, but that would show you to be willingly ignorant to views of the world and life itself that are different than your own. You have reasons for believing the things that you believe. However, those reasons that you think you have are not your actual reasons.

You have a fear deep inside you. You have a sense of perfection, like the world needs to be a certain way in order for the most people to be at (what you would call) peace. That fear makes you think that you MUST be in a submissive position to someone or something of higher power, higher order, higher brilliance, higher everything. There are just so many things happening at once in this world, someone has to be heading it. Surely humans can't coordinate with each other in ways that lead to progress, because we as individuals are just too stupid to make things work.

But no, we can. Civilizations are built by the power of many minds of many backgrounds with many years of education and experience (or bold ambitions being put to the test) in many fields and trades. It's what we as a species do. But our minds are such weird things. They're like 4th-dimensional key-holes into the 3rd dimension. You're trying to find something beyond everything you see so that it has control over all this insanity of people thinking it's a good idea for people to not be financially punished for getting sick or injured, or being financially burdened for desiring the virtue of education, or spending time at home with a newborn son or daughter instead of having to go straight back to work after childbirth.

It's when people like you look at these ideas that would help the human race, and you think, "Humans can't work together and do anything good while I'm sitting here with a drawing tablet that'll never waste another tree on paper-waste." It's people like you who see the progress at hand, and you try to stop it because you're afraid that the world will change while you're getting cozy.

Tough cookies, pup. Life is dynamic. It changes. Our understanding of life changes, evolves, grows, matures, becomes wiser, generally seeks an enlightened state. But you want to hold us back, and for what? So we can stand in a pointy building on Sunday mornings? So we can expose the lizard-people who are running the country and take hillary clinton's human-suit off?

Take a hike. Seriously, pack a lunch and plenty of water, and go take a hike somewhere you won't hear about any of the bullshit that excites you but is purely fictional.

Lastly, just in case you have strong feelings about an unrelated topic: Noah's flood in the book of Genesis in the Christian bible never happened, at least not globally. There was not video of that flood ever happening, but as a geology graduate, I can tell you all the reasons that strata from the Archean through the Holocene (or Anthropocene, but this is still being debated) at pretty much any location on Earth disproves a global flood. It just didn't happen. It wasn't literal, it was a story with a life lesson in there. Just sayin'.

Now no more bullshit. Only smart stuff if you're not going to hide my comments.

*Clears throat*

The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that "[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy trial" The Clause protects the defendant from delay between the presentation of the indictment or similar charging instrument and the beginning of trial.

The article you posted from the NYT's, which is run by Carlos Slim, A Mexican Billionaire who spent Millions in support for Hillary Clinton in free Advertising and is a high paying member of the Clinton Foundation (90 Billion stolen from Haiti) frequently attacks President Trump (Love saying that) and will manipulate words to make it against him in any way. If you are truely intelligent as you say that the Second Amendment was designed against threats Foreign AND Domestic. If she had gotten into office, we would have revolted. Remember when they cried weeks before the election "NO SUCH THING AS ELECTION FRAUD!" I do. The day after the election. "RUSSIANS DID IT! RUSSIANS DID IT! NOT MY PRESIDENT!" I can go on. Oh wait I will. November 4th last year the NYT posted on the front page a FULL PAGE on Overthrowing the Presidency. Look it up. Google the image alone. I dare you.

I do have a deep fear. You're right. My fear is that my children will never be given the chance to have a decent education due to the Marxist-Fascist propaganda being forced down our kids throats. Perfection is something that no one can achieve but all strive for. I simply want and wish for balance of peace and mind within everyone. Not hostility towards others. The fact that we're debating right now is something. And I'm not the one tossing accusations at you or calling you things that you may completely not be. But I will state one fact I see more on FA. A majority are very Leftist in thinking and acting, and will attack others who speak or even think differently. While I am here trying to protect not just the right of speech for those with Infowars, but for you as well.

I believe you are right and wrong, there have been people who have done great things within Civilization who had not a lick of education behind them. Leonardo Da Vinci was taught by a painter for an example. Here's a nice list of those who made great advancements in humanity who had no such gifts as a grand education. https://jamesaconrad.com/TK/famous-.....ce-degree.html Education is one thing, but true Common Sense is an act within Humanity that falls more to the wayside as more want to use just their feelings instead of facts and reality. It saddens me.

So please explain to me why you think that I believe that "Humans can't work together and do anything good while I'm sitting here with a drawing tablet that'll never waste another tree on paper-waste." Why even assume that? That is so far from the target I wont even attempt to repeat such with you, so I wont.

But you're right. Life is dynamic, it changes. But what do we do if something that one group of people don't like what the other does? We clash. In words or by force. I would rather have the use of words in order to find a balance and use force as an absolute last resort. Absolute. If I have no choice but to use force in order to protect people and ideals I believe are right to use by all people in our nation, then so be it. A great line my father once told me, "If it aint broke, don't fucking fix it." Do I want to hold people back? -I- do not. But there are people who absolutely do, to not just me, but you, and all over the planet. If you want to go into that line of talk, do it on your own time.

Look in a mirror mate, and tell yourself the same thing on what you believe to be facts for your own echo chamber. But remember, Civil Wars don't start with gunshots, they start with words.

Never happened? Well I will simply use your own material and show you something. NYT's did a piece on just that and showed support for it. https://www.nytimes.com/2001/01/09/.....h-s-flood.html Geological Evidence? "And the notion of Dr. Albert Ammerman of Colgate University, specifically raised questions about the supposed link between the deluge and migrations into Europe. He pointed out that there is a 200-year discrepancy between the time of the Black Sea flood and earliest evidence for settlements, in central Hungary, of what is known as the Linear Pottery Culture. These were the people who apparently introduced farming into Europe." (Yes I cut this bit from the article, so its the NYT's words directly, not mine.

I do believe I'm not the only one here taking bullshit for literal.

Enjoy your day.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKNTL_GdqJU

The rules and guidelines on jones' very infowars site says that anyone who does on the site what jones does, they can be removed, and it's not censorship. Yes, by doing the things that would get someone banned on his own site, jones got himself deleted from other private corporation websites who have the right to delete their users' accounts. https://youtu.be/iKNTL_GdqJU?t=2m26s

I've already told you that I'm not going to argue whether a shooting happened in the United States. We're savages when it comes to guns. We have a rate of more than one mass shooting per day (more than 5 people killed per shooting). Yes, it happened. Go to Hollywood to see how a set can be made. Go to Sandy Hook Elementary School and ask all the children who survived a school shooting. All the kids, even the ones who are bad at acting. (Don't you dare say that every kid there is an actor, because your own common sense tells you that only a few kids can actually hold attention to properly and convincingly act. Don't pull any bullshit out of your ass.).

Why would you look to information against infowars from a group that names themselves directly from an actual Genocide? http://www.armenian-genocide.org/young_turks.html Who have directly acted against infowars in disgusting acts. Here's have a video showing TYT's attacking Infowars uncensored. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-HP8y5ByA8

Here's a few good lines: "I'm not going to debate this guy, You're a hatchet Man" - Why not prove him wrong and actually debate? "All you do is lie!" - Name one lie Roger Stone has stated. I can't find one. "GET OFF THE STAGE YOU FAT FUCK!" - Says the reporter working for TYT that says its hate speech to fat shame.

Who are the ones who are calm, and who are the ones who are hostile?

And the rules and guidelines are only enacted selectively. Did they show the video's in question when they shut down David Knight? No. Did they give Alex Jones a chance to fix his videos in question? No.

If you use Sandy Hook as sole evidence to shut down infowars, You are living in an echo chamber. I feel pity for you. Even Alex Jones has said multiple times he was not sure and played devil's advocate for BOTH sides. But you didn't hear that did you? Here. From Media matters. You will see that they use clips of him saying it was a hoax years and years ago, but when they show media relatively new and recent, his opinion changes. As do -ALL- opinions over time. Mine, Yours. Everyones. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mkWAjaVlhHc The first 3:50 show him saying it was a total hoax, after that you see him stating other facts, yes facts and the paperwork with them, on why he supports his findings.

Guns do not make people savage. It is the mindset of the people using those guns which makes them savages or men. Give a drug addict a gun, he will rob to feed his addiction. Give a gun to a common man in a gas station seeing a robbery, he will try to stop it.

For one thing, tyt has addressed their name, and have expressed repeatedly that violence is not the way to solve humanity's problems. Stop building a mental wall that keeps you in the small-minded perspective you have. I've also seen that video. alex jones interrupted a shoot that tyt was doing, offered Cenk a shirt that read "RAPE" with Bill Clinton's face on it. Here's the more complete clip, from before jones appeared through the time he leaves. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4pX53AqpUs Stop trying to take snippets that cut out the parts that directly contradict the bullshit you're saying.

You're saying that it was wrong of tyt not to stop the shoot that they were doing, just to answer the questions of an insane man and his professionally deceitful friend are asking? Do you understand what you're saying? What rights do you want in this country? If TYT had interrupted info wars, would you be saying that jones should answer everything that TYT asks, or should jones try to do his shoot without getting interrupted by people you perceive to be lunatics? You have no rationality to what you say.

What else have you said. More morality cherry-picking, more denying of a mass shooting in which American children and teachers were killed by gun violence, some of that right-wing bullshit that guns themselves (as devices invented solely to cause great injury or death to organisms they're pointed at) are harmless...

That last bit though. "Give a gun to a common man..." You clearly think that more guns is the answer to ending gun violence. Tell me though, what happens when a third gun wielder sees the "common man" shooting at the addict who's shooting back? (And let's also just mention here that addiction is a disease, not a choice, just like alcohol, nicotine, etc.) Well the third person sees two people shooting. Which one's good, which one's bad, are they both bad, who do I shoot, now we have a bullet-hell with three general directions of bullets. But wait, a 4th gun owner comes in and sees three people shooting. They'll know who the actual "bad guy" is! Oh, no, everyone looks like normal people with guns, shooting at each other. Screw it, let's add bullets in a 4th direction.

You just don't get it. Adding fire to fire makes more fire.
And to your original post, alex jones got deleted from multiple sites because he violated terms of service that they have, but also the ones that his own site has. You don't need to see a video to read the rules on his site. Here they are: https://www.infowars.com/terms-of-service/#twenty
He did things against his own rules, on other sites that have similar rules, and he got deleted for those things (long overdue, too). It's not censorship, it's a violation of the user agreement. Being deleted from those platforms was well within those companies' rights.

Please also don 't link me to videos of jones saying that things are things when he has no evidence. I'm a geologist. You can't tell me that something absurd is true without showing me scientifically viable evidence for that absurd thing to be true. He never gives evidence.

Let me see if I can understand you better by telling you of this event that I can give you a reference or two to look into more deeply if you want to. I'm interested in what you think of it.
alex jones, not long ago, had a domestic problem, that it was being questioned whether he was fit to be around his kids.
His lawyer pushed for the idea that who alex jones is on-screen is a character, a facade, a creation of a performance artist. If this were to be accepted, jones would get to keep seeing his kids, but it would mean that alex jones is just a performance artist, giving a performance, and this performance features hyped up, childish rage and misguided sexuality in such a way that pushes non-FDA approved mystery suppliments of questionable efficacy, while simultaneously getting people to believe that the fictional statements of his performance are true observations of the real world.

However, if that's not true, and alex jones on-screen is not a performance artist, then he's a man who sincerely believes that George Soros and the Bilderberg Group is controlling the world, working for shape-shifting lizard-people.

You need medicine. You need some skunky medicine that you can inhale through a glass horsecock, and then you need to go chill around a waterfall for a little while.

*Sigh*

Instead of a typed context on what I want to say, I'll let another who summed up a whole video instead because he spoke virtually the entirety of what I want to say.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cn4SjJ1ewVI

And while you can state a lot of things in which Alex Jones was wrong on, I dare you to say something in which he was right.

And no thanks, I'll pass on the drugs. We have too many of them being forced down everyone's throats while they stay glued to their cell phones like oxygen.

Enjoy the rest of your evening.

I'm not about to spend 12 minutes of my night listening to some third party who's blabbing while playing his video games. You're asking me to walk into this guy's living room and sit down to hear him yak about how someone whose words have inspired and even directed hostile action toward other human beings was taken off of platforms he used to anger and inspire people to do such stupid things.

But you just let me know a bit about your mentality. You clearly think that all substances are the same, and that all are detrimental. Do your homework though. You'll find that Uncle Sam and alex jones (with his mystery supplements that he sells) are pretty stupid, especially Uncle Sam. "Just say 'NO!' and don't f*cking question us."

1. If you can't take 12 minutes to listen to another voice, you don't deserve the rights that our forefathers bled and died for. I pity you and your stone mind that is blind and ignorant to the actions taken against people.

2. To do stupid things? I guess standing up for your rights and liberties is a stupid thing then. Don't bother coming to Iowa, you'll hate the state motto and freak out over it.

3. Question your own mentality. I come forward to state an opinion that I know I will get attacked on, and over the past five days, only to have simply been proven right. Without saying much more than now.

4. His so called mystery supplements are some of the same if not better than that sold in Whole foods for a fraction of the cost. I know. I take two of them and the toothpaste. Which I will state for the record is the best I've ever used. Why don't you try one or two of them?

Your 4th point. That's all a court would need in order to say that you are of a very specific hostile and primitive mentality, that because of your inability to just chill, you're causing scenes.

Tell me, are lizard-people running the world?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABW39tUBtx4

I know all you're going to say about this independent and completely open media company, so don't waste your energy. Listen to the words, not your preconceived assumptions and prejudices. Listen to the words. Listen. To. The. Words. Just listen to the words, do you understand? Not your preconceived prejudices.

You're still listening to your preconceived prejudices. Listen to the words. You're smart enough to know which ones are objective and which ones are subjective discussion (which starts around 2:50, at which point the news report turns from news reporting to discussion).

I know you're going to nag me for giving you a link to a video after I said I wouldn't sit through yours. But I gave you a link to a journalism report. This is the transfer of information about the world around us from distant places to the individual reader/viewer/listener. What I linked to you exhibits professional journalism with distinct discussion segments that are not their objective reporting of news events. Yours was some guy ranting while playing a video game.

Make sure you didn't skip that third block there. You'll want to get snappy about my posting something for you to sit through, but you need to see how I know exactly how you think. Your worldview is wrong. No, it is. Trust me, you're wrong. It doesn't mean you're bad, it just means that you need to change how you perceive the world around you. Go explore and do some cool things. It's alright. Just go do some cool things, then be chill and tell others about cool things. Don't get fussy over someone getting banned for saying, "It's time to criminally strike back."

Nah I'm not going to nag at you for posting to the Young Turks. Considering that's all you're going to use at this point, and considering that TYT has all their funding given to them, and Jones gets his through just viewers, who's buying who's trash?

Hey wait. I remember Qatar giving them money... Didn't they give funding to ISIS as well? Oh and then there's the million dollar donations from Wall Street and a good chunk from was given by a known Nazi collaborator George Soros. Oh and I just checked TYT's store. Nothing but hats and overpriced bobbles. Infowars Sells more than ten times what they do and it shows. If TYT's had their funding pulled, would you get upset?

If TYT is your exhibit of professional journalism, I do believe you failed. I don't see any of their reporters getting toe to toe showing ANTIFA marches and getting assaulted by them. None of them have the balls to do REAL journalism and actually ask questions. They just push the hate filled Anti-American garbage pushed in front of them.

One more thing.

https://gyazo.com/3ba7b68445b2b001e8e920122f9e6322

If these two products contents are enough to have a court state I'm hostile and primitive mentality, then we really do need to remove a lot of judges from their posts because the law and order than made this country is gone.

The only people who say it's time to criminally strike back, are you and those who call to overthrown the president by hostile means all because they couldn't take losing a Democratically Elected President.

Actually, you are in fact wrong about tyt giving money to ISIS. That's absolutely ridiculous and you know it, so stop believing it.

Read the rest of my comment, because I went through your thought process. You just skipped too far ahead.

Stop believing bullshit. Really mate, you're believing in bullshit. The things you want for the world cause people to suffer, and you want people's rights taken away at the same time you'll proudly declare that all men are created equal by our Constitution.

You're a hypocrite without knowing, in a myriad of ways. You need to be chill.

And you also need to tell me why you think that alex jones should not be removed for telling listeners that it's time to take arms against the government and attack first. He said to his listeners that it's time to violently rise up against the nation. wtf is wrong with you?

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." Mahatma Gandhi

Boy you read that wrong. Very wrong.

I Stated that Qatar gave money to ISIS and also gave money to TYT. Who's taking what out of context?

Here's my proof from the main spokesman himself of TYT. https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_.....;v=SPpt7-Bvbxg

Did you hear that? AJ+ A digital Channel for Al Jezzera. A Qatar State ran media organization with multiple controversies showing for support of ISIS/ISIL. Most recently with its support of Syrian Rebels. More proof is here on wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Ja....._and_criticism

I hear that Infowars is complaining that they still haven't gotten their paychecks from Putin. Hmmm....

The only bullshit I see is from people like you who claim to be fighting for freedom of speech but are completely bolsheviks. Yes. I am calling you a Bolshevik. A group of people who claimed to be fighting for the people but in the end butchered more than Hitler's regime.

Amendment I. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

And yet...
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/.....c-senator-says

You'll say that all the companies that banned him are private. I'll call bullshit when companies like Facebook, Youtube, Google and Apple service Billions of people every day. Where does the banning stop? When does it stop? At what cost will it stop?

https://youtu.be/s3RNsZvdYZQ?t=83 This is pretty much how I feel in this subject.

At this point from the start of my statement, we are now at the fighting. I pray it never comes to the use of bullets. By Christ almighty I pray it doesn't.

And to also add to your statement. I hope you read the full text on the 2nd Amendment and the famous words by the Third President of the United States.

"When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."

There are enough calls by Democrat senators and congressmen to harm any Trump supporter they see. Do you expect us to simply lay down and take it?

I don't want to put effort toward another violent revolution that has humans killing fathers, mothers, brothers, or sisters. We have ways to legally change things for the benefit of the People of the United States, using non-violent communication, reason, rationality, civility, and a vigil eye to oversee whether there is corruption happening in the federal, state, and local governments.

If you don't learn from the past, you're doomed to repeat it. Violent revolutions are just checkpoints on a loop. Rise out of that loop.

Please tell me if you think that frogs are turning gay, by the way. Not the ones on this site, because there's no shortage of fag-frogs (no disrespect). But the ones in reality, will you please tell geographically where the gay frogs are?

If you don't want a revolution then quit having toxic ideologies that are going to get 48% of American voters killed, silenced, harassed and excommunicated you little worm.

You clearly have NOT learned of the past because you're a 28 year old indoctrinated by the very racist party who founded the KKK.

Leaving out that bafoon Alex Jones, I can tell that your crystal clear political bias and support for TYT (so named because of the Armenian Genocide of which Cenk Uygur is unapologetic) makes you a piece of shit and worthy of criticism.

One topic at a time, please. Ranting and raving is childish.

Don't pretend you're overwhelmed by information. Ignorance is not a defense.

It's just extremely annoying to type one post that has multiple topics to keep up with when we aren't even sitting face to face. Be chill, and stick with one topic.
And don't be pissy that alex jones was taken off of social media platforms after he urged his listeners to violently rise against other Americans.

I believe that you believe that the world is significantly dumber than you are.
Please consider the statistics of that.

And 7 months later TYT supports late term abortions, harasses minors from a Catholic school, harasses Candice Owens at a restaurant, and supports Senator Cortez on her lazy, sloppy, incompetent, and morally bankrupt "Green New Deal". Your support of TYT makes you a terrorist and I hope to God that justice will find you one day in this life or the next.

This is the dumbest post I've seen this week.

I mean yeah it's only Tuesday but I'm sure nothing will surpass it.

So you accept censorship against you as well? Just because someone doesn't and you think it's stupid?

all i got to say who the blame for this, which we all know Who he is.

It's not Trump sis.

Yes it is, we never had this kinda issue when obama was our presidential leader

I continue to believe that the current thing happening with the GOP is not the fault of Trump. If anything, Trump saw or was quickly clued into this vein of anger and such, and decided to exploit it.

That's because the media covered for him. What kind of bs statement is that?

I will just say that those companies being private platforms and them being monopolies needing to be broken up are not mutually exclusive.

Everything else you say here... hoooooooo boy. Not gonna touch that.

I'm not sure I follow you.

Mind going into a little more detail?

And the other topics? I wont force you to talk on it, but I will ask you think about it.

Google et all being private companies has nothing to do with them being monopolies that need to be broken up. I'm not even sure I necessarily agree with you on the latter so much as those companies requiring reformation with an idea towards the human cost of their decisions and the overreliance on algorithms.

And I have thought a lot about your arguments here, and I find them quite lacking.

If you noticed on how fast all these companies worked together to do this, you would see a red flag. To do this takes quite a few people not just in these companies, but in the legislature as well. Just like Standard Oil was broken up, these companies must be as well if we are to continue even having the ability to speak our minds, even if none of us agree with it or like.

I will however agree with you that the human cost of their decisions and over reliance on algorithms must be addressed in full. And once taken into what they do, be changes to be equal and fair for everyone. Otherwise we are no better than the Chinese censoring everyone and forcing them to change or face consequences.

Unless I'm misinterpreting you, you seem to be implying that these companies are already the same company?

Also, no, we're not close to the China. Nobody is being censored, they're being denied platforms. That is not censoring. Alex Jones is not going to jail for his views, companies have just decided not to host them. He is free to continue to spout his views, but just not in certain places, because those companies do not want to be associated with his views. This is, again, not censorship. No one is entitled to a certain platform.

No gods, no masters.
No slaves,no servants.
Anarchy will rise.
Death to the Politicians.
Death to the Lobbyists.
Death to governmental control.
Death to the Rich.
Death to extremist left.
Death to extremist right.
Death to organized religion.
Death to the media.

Only then will man truly be free.

But until then, we are slaves to the machine, and we will die slaves.

I will argue against this for the sake of Free Speech even if I do not approve of what you say.

Blind loyalty to a God or Master is insanity.
We in the USA fought a Civil War to stop such, but people blindly cry out to become such once more.
Anarchy cannot survive long term.
The Corrupt must be punished to the same laws they press in the same weight.
To pay for a law is immoral and creates injustice.
One should not call out death for the wealthy, it must be looked upon in how it was gained.
Extremism to Authoritarian is dangerous, they who support it must not be killed but prosecuted by just laws.
Extremism to Anarchy is destructive, there would be no laws except by the mob.
Organized Religion which pushes blind loyalty to the State or in means of hostility, cannot be accepted.
To call death to any forms of media, no matter if false or not, makes us no better than them.

Man can truly be free if he finds the proper balance without extremes, to accept an unbiased truth, or a partisan tactic.

But we will be slaves if we never fight. And our humanity will be taken if lying down to the machines.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/07/.....protected.html

why don't you read this?

I have. And the NYT's is a double standard. I've listened to him since 2015, and he has not once ever called for violence. Is he facing defamation lawsuits? Massively. And it's a form of warfare as Roger Stone has called it, where you force people into lawsuits and stretch it out for as long as possible until the defending party runs out of money and has to submit. And the NYT's is a MASSIVE double standard ran by a guy who gave millions to Hillary Clinton for her campaign. Plus I do hope you review NYT vs Sullivan. Plus have you noticed how many more news websites are removing their comment section?

Total Freedom of speech must be protected even if you do not like it, excluding ones that call for violence. Which I will add that groups such as ANTIFA and ISIS is barely touched, when they are openly calling for violence against people. Now, even CNN is calling unclassified "Hate Speech" as Terrorism. Are you guys out of your mind!? You can classify almost anything as hate speech, you could classify what I am saying right now as hate speech and therefore terrorism.

Stefan Molynuex stated moments ago on the Infowars news cast and I quote "Those who support free speech as terrorism, and those who support terrorism is free speech." Did you see what happened to NBC in Charlottesville that were physically attacked by ANTIFA? And they shut up about it.


Why don't you look at other sources and even Alex Jones for a few days. Get both sides and then make a statement.

so just because the article was written by the NYT, what the 6 men who have studied the constitution has no merit? Besides if you want total freedom of speech, that means anyone could make up lies about you and get you harassed by throngs of people which is exactly what Jones did to get himself in hot water in the first place.

I really think you only understand "freedom of speech" as freedom to say things only you and like-minded people deem acceptable.

Why would I want to listen to a man who screams about outlandish things with no concrete evidence until he literally turns pink in the face?

So no one can speak if it is not liked?

No one can be without harm if they say something that is wrong?

I don't agree or believe what you're saying right now, am I demanding that your voice be silenced? No.

That right there is standing for freedom of speech, because it affects ALL sides.

If I was calling for you to be harmed or killed, that is NOT supported for freedom of speech. I would face charges, but I am not. I have no reason to even if what you say is wrong.

Also, if I recall how many new paper groups supported Trump during his run for Presidency?


And why wouldn't you want to listen to him? How many MORE now are cause of his banning? I'd say millions now than before.

"The Streisand effect is a phenomenon whereby an attempt to hide, remove, or censor a piece of information has the unintended consequence of publicizing the information more widely, usually facilitated by the Internet."

Are you aware that the first amendment only applies to the government and not companies?

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances"

I see nothing in there about businesses.

Jesus, this comment section is a real shit-show. But yeah. I totally agree with you on the subject of free speech. Though, I find it very sad that people abuse the absolute fuck out of it 24/7.