
to_like_or_not_to_like.exe
Replace Likes and retweets with Favorites and you have essentially the same dilemma
Twitter link: https://twitter.com/ThwillArtz/stat.....97109823098882
Every like & retweet helps me a ton!
Twitter link: https://twitter.com/ThwillArtz/stat.....97109823098882
Every like & retweet helps me a ton!
Category Artwork (Digital) / Comics
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 503 x 285px
File Size 58.3 kB
I can understand that statement. But personally If you can't take the 'normie' attack you should think through what you said. That attack is a hammer, I like to use the full force of it to forge myself.
In a way, the response is like a machine with an algerithome. It doesn't care whats its facing or its points, only that it survives and if it has to attack again. So in the end that 'normie machine' is only going to accept two answers to stop, "Target is okay, stop attacking," Or "Target is gone." They are white blood cells looking for targets on the net. Sights like Furaffinity are harder to clean up. So they leave it to 'special cells'.
In a way, the response is like a machine with an algerithome. It doesn't care whats its facing or its points, only that it survives and if it has to attack again. So in the end that 'normie machine' is only going to accept two answers to stop, "Target is okay, stop attacking," Or "Target is gone." They are white blood cells looking for targets on the net. Sights like Furaffinity are harder to clean up. So they leave it to 'special cells'.
Heh...
Still, the word normie fits a lot of the time. To me Normie is someone who reads a part of something out of context, or some sort of context you put down yourself. Because context is down to someone's perspective, the word context only gets a double meaning, theirs, and ours. The only way to break it is to say 'ours' because saying 'their context' doesn't include you, and you still want to differ from the behavure they are interpreting.
"I can accept your argument, but can you accept mine?" This is the standard I set for myself, because not only does it allows closure, its also puts down a line in the ground. even if they say, "I can accept your reasoning I can't accept the events that took place." I can protect myself. Not because they are disagreeing with me, but they have to add to it, and the subject changes. The old argument was already cemented into the ground, then they need to fight on it.
Still, the word normie fits a lot of the time. To me Normie is someone who reads a part of something out of context, or some sort of context you put down yourself. Because context is down to someone's perspective, the word context only gets a double meaning, theirs, and ours. The only way to break it is to say 'ours' because saying 'their context' doesn't include you, and you still want to differ from the behavure they are interpreting.
"I can accept your argument, but can you accept mine?" This is the standard I set for myself, because not only does it allows closure, its also puts down a line in the ground. even if they say, "I can accept your reasoning I can't accept the events that took place." I can protect myself. Not because they are disagreeing with me, but they have to add to it, and the subject changes. The old argument was already cemented into the ground, then they need to fight on it.
Comments