Another Hayven Celestia species! This species was invented by Gre7g and I filled in some of the gaps
Some other things he wanted me to mention:
Geordians were the ones who originally discovered the geroo for Planetary Acquisitions
Geordian children's books and stories are all strictly poetry
Posted using PostyBirb
Some other things he wanted me to mention:
Geordians were the ones who originally discovered the geroo for Planetary Acquisitions
Geordian children's books and stories are all strictly poetry
Posted using PostyBirb
Category Artwork (Digital) / General Furry Art
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1562 x 1289px
File Size 2.13 MB
http://geroo.space/index.php?title=Stories
I wish I had a better page to show it off . . . but my website isn't even loading now, so
I wish I had a better page to show it off . . . but my website isn't even loading now, so
The idea of the clans seems like an odd idea, but it’s really just a somewhat more extreme example of how humans behave in their social circles.
We often stick to the ideas of our social groups, try to be with groups who align with our ideas, seek out groups of people to be with, our sense if validation and self achievement is often influenced by these groups, we are hesitant to counter the ideologies of the social groups were in, and will often go through great hardships to maintain connections to our social groups.
We often stick to the ideas of our social groups, try to be with groups who align with our ideas, seek out groups of people to be with, our sense if validation and self achievement is often influenced by these groups, we are hesitant to counter the ideologies of the social groups were in, and will often go through great hardships to maintain connections to our social groups.
The Geordian clan groups have me quite facinated by the species sociology.
One of the notable things I find interesting is the nature of the clans reads as something that would naturally favor a conservative society, as progressive individuals suppress their progressive stances to remain in line with their clan’s ideology, or members of a clan resist external progressive influences holding the entire clan back. However, since the ref sheet does not note them as being concervative (in contrast to the Karkun and Anup sheets), it’s clear to me there is more at play.
My best assessment is while a clan members will try to maintain similar ideology’s, they as a group are dynamic and each member can exert force to direct the ideology of the group in a specific direction. Thus a clan is in constant ideological flux, changing and adapting in response to it’s members, other clans and individuals, and the world around them.
Though I am quite curious about how clans evolve and change over time, and how a Geordian’s bond with a clan can change.
Like, clans seems to have a natural limit on their size (a few hundred members at most), so does that mean that if a clan grows beyond that it will break up into two or more clans? Can intense conflicts over matters in a clan lead to clans fracturing into different groups?
Is the process of finding a clan to call one’s own a natural part of Geordian life?
If a Geordian finds themself being mistreated by a clan, would they be willing to jump ship or stay and try to hold on for as long as possible? Do Geordians have a hard time recognizing mistreatment from their clans because their sense if self acheivment comes from them?
When Geordians engage in close relationships with those outside their clans, do they and the other person have to decide which clan they stick with? Do Geordians move between clans as part of close relationships?
If a Geordian has an ideological clash with their clan they can’t easily resolve would they jump ship for another clan that aligns with them? How much would a Geordian go through to remain aligned to their clan?
One of the notable things I find interesting is the nature of the clans reads as something that would naturally favor a conservative society, as progressive individuals suppress their progressive stances to remain in line with their clan’s ideology, or members of a clan resist external progressive influences holding the entire clan back. However, since the ref sheet does not note them as being concervative (in contrast to the Karkun and Anup sheets), it’s clear to me there is more at play.
My best assessment is while a clan members will try to maintain similar ideology’s, they as a group are dynamic and each member can exert force to direct the ideology of the group in a specific direction. Thus a clan is in constant ideological flux, changing and adapting in response to it’s members, other clans and individuals, and the world around them.
Though I am quite curious about how clans evolve and change over time, and how a Geordian’s bond with a clan can change.
Like, clans seems to have a natural limit on their size (a few hundred members at most), so does that mean that if a clan grows beyond that it will break up into two or more clans? Can intense conflicts over matters in a clan lead to clans fracturing into different groups?
Is the process of finding a clan to call one’s own a natural part of Geordian life?
If a Geordian finds themself being mistreated by a clan, would they be willing to jump ship or stay and try to hold on for as long as possible? Do Geordians have a hard time recognizing mistreatment from their clans because their sense if self acheivment comes from them?
When Geordians engage in close relationships with those outside their clans, do they and the other person have to decide which clan they stick with? Do Geordians move between clans as part of close relationships?
If a Geordian has an ideological clash with their clan they can’t easily resolve would they jump ship for another clan that aligns with them? How much would a Geordian go through to remain aligned to their clan?
FA+


Comments