FA+
Shop
373
Views
Views
16
Favorites
Favorites
Category
All / General Furry Art
Species Vulpine (Other)
Size 740 x 995
File Size 400.6 kB
Report this content
More from Ruffy
Listed in Folders
emiyaCategory All / General Furry Art
Species Vulpine (Other)
Size 740 x 995px
File Size 400.6 kB
Listed in Folders
I agree with you completely. Not only is the figure oddly proportioned, but all the appendages including the head are jutting out at bizarre angles. Compositionally its flat as a dime on its face. No perspective to it at all, all the grass is the same size and no sense of planar depth. Oh and look at those flat void shapes RIGHT behind him. That CANT be a city, a city would be actually have color in it, and a city like that wouldn't be constructed in the middle of the open prarie with NOTHING around it buy emptyness.
not that i'm arguing with artistic opinions, but i just wanted to point out that i think that's the top of a castle int he background, not a city.
And i do believe she made the blades in the foreground slightly large and a bit darker than those on the top of the hill, which are significantly smaller.
Also- do Em a favour and post this on her Fa page, so she can make use of this rather than the person who got the comish that can do nothing about it >^.~<
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/302533/
And i do believe she made the blades in the foreground slightly large and a bit darker than those on the top of the hill, which are significantly smaller.
Also- do Em a favour and post this on her Fa page, so she can make use of this rather than the person who got the comish that can do nothing about it >^.~<
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/302533/
well thats not nice hon *noses* i think she did a fantastic job, its a different take on ruffy than the norm and even tho gore will be quick to mouth off about his "obvious" superiority on the subject of art, its not how its drawn, its what went into drawing it, and i really love this pic =^.^=
"its not how its drawn, its what went into drawing it"
Thats like saying a piece of crap which took 60 hours to complete shouldn't be looked at badly, because lots of effort went into it. Please feel free to share your little opinion about art to all the artists who have to make 80 digital backgrounds a week for "Foster's Home of Imaginary Pets" with an industry level of quality, just to keep their job.
Thats like saying a piece of crap which took 60 hours to complete shouldn't be looked at badly, because lots of effort went into it. Please feel free to share your little opinion about art to all the artists who have to make 80 digital backgrounds a week for "Foster's Home of Imaginary Pets" with an industry level of quality, just to keep their job.
the difference is in the motivation, they get paid to make it industry level but the fact that they love what they do makes it better, in all cicumstances. yes a piece of crap that took 60 hours to complete is worth looking at in a good light, what matters most to me, and we're obviously speaking subjectively, is the effort put into it which always makes the finished piece look better, no matter the level of art. would you tell someone who just started drawing that everything they did was crap merely cause they hadn't had the practice?
ha ha, what are you talking about, Of course I would! Because thats me. Everyone should choose their own actions. If I say something looks like crap, the person responsible for it has the option to take it like a pus, or to put some effort into asking why. Upon explanation from their efforts, they could further choose to ask what they could do better. Yadda yadda yadda, your subjectivity negates all arguments, but when dealing with other artists, I make THEM put forth just as much effort towards improving their works as I am willing to teach them how to improve it.
Comments