
I wanted to draw something cute to cheer myself up, and I saw this video of a mother hen protecting her chicks from the rain today, and totally imagined them as little dinosaurs
Category All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1000 x 633px
File Size 199.1 kB
Ohh do you mean this one? http://www.newscientist.com/wp-cont.....6970-1_800.jpg
I was simply voicing a personal preference.
But consider this: When it was first discovered the "reality" was that the iguanodon looked like this: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipe.....alace_Park.jpg
And for a very long time it was "reality" that sauropods could only live in water because otherwise they wouldn't be able to support their own weight. Or that 2-legged dinosaurs had an upright posture with their tails on the ground for support.
Eventually they'll find something new and the "reality" of what dinos looked like will change again.
But consider this: When it was first discovered the "reality" was that the iguanodon looked like this: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipe.....alace_Park.jpg
And for a very long time it was "reality" that sauropods could only live in water because otherwise they wouldn't be able to support their own weight. Or that 2-legged dinosaurs had an upright posture with their tails on the ground for support.
Eventually they'll find something new and the "reality" of what dinos looked like will change again.
We’ve come a long way since those first few fossil finds. You might be amazed by some of the technological advancements we’ve made that let us view dinosaurs — and other animals — with much more accuracy.
I’ve literally studied paleontology, and I’ve considered doing it as a career before in the past. I’m aware of the history of fossil discoveries, and how it’s changed over time.
Dromaeosaurs, like the ones Maquenda drew here, would have undoubtably had feathers. Many bones discovered (in the right conditions for conservation, since the conditions required to fossilize are extremely high) of these types of animals show the quill knobs in the “wings” where feathers would attach, like modern birds. Many more have been discovered with feather imprints (which have different structures than plants/leaves) or direct feathers themselves; some of these animals (Microraptor, Anchiornis, etc.) we can actually deduce the colors of based on the melanosomes visible underneath a microscope.
So yes, you’re correct in that our knowledge of dinosaurs changes all the time. But feathered dinosaurs (at least for some types) aren’t going to be leaving reality any time soon.
Also: https://adam-loves-dinosaurs.tumblr.....quick-reminder
I’ve literally studied paleontology, and I’ve considered doing it as a career before in the past. I’m aware of the history of fossil discoveries, and how it’s changed over time.
Dromaeosaurs, like the ones Maquenda drew here, would have undoubtably had feathers. Many bones discovered (in the right conditions for conservation, since the conditions required to fossilize are extremely high) of these types of animals show the quill knobs in the “wings” where feathers would attach, like modern birds. Many more have been discovered with feather imprints (which have different structures than plants/leaves) or direct feathers themselves; some of these animals (Microraptor, Anchiornis, etc.) we can actually deduce the colors of based on the melanosomes visible underneath a microscope.
So yes, you’re correct in that our knowledge of dinosaurs changes all the time. But feathered dinosaurs (at least for some types) aren’t going to be leaving reality any time soon.
Also: https://adam-loves-dinosaurs.tumblr.....quick-reminder
Dromeosaurs (“raptors”) likely all would have been feathered, based on how evolution works and phylogenetic bracketing. Basically, what that means is that we’ve found relatives of these animals that have feathers in fossil evidence, and can then assume that related animals had similar structures.
Dinosaurs that didn’t have feathers were other lineages that weren’t really related to raptors in the first place apart from fitting under the “dinosaur” label.
Dinosaurs that didn’t have feathers were other lineages that weren’t really related to raptors in the first place apart from fitting under the “dinosaur” label.
yeah, thats true. I didn't mean raptors to be not feathered at all. I wonder, for example, if T-rex or such huge guys were feathred (cause there many fun pics with them :D I can't honestly imagine such big creature feeathered), maybe you know some info :3 ?
Scientists still argue about many species back there
Scientists still argue about many species back there
T. rex may or may not have been feathered! We have some skin patches from that animal directly, but since they only a couple centimeters long (on an animal that was over 40-feet long) and on areas that could've been featherless anyways (under the tail, bottom of the legs, etc.) it's not super clear. Additionally, if I remember correctly, the skin patches were more like naked skin on a plucked bird, not like the scaly skin of a different reptile. That means it could've been feathered and they didn't preserve on that specific animal, but it's still up for debate.
A recent paper was published about a T. rex relative that could've had a scaly snout. The information is really controversial, though, since the fossil they examined wasn't in fantastic condition -- even for as far as fossils go -- and they might've misinterpreted the evidence in their haste to publish. It depends, though.
A recent paper was published about a T. rex relative that could've had a scaly snout. The information is really controversial, though, since the fossil they examined wasn't in fantastic condition -- even for as far as fossils go -- and they might've misinterpreted the evidence in their haste to publish. It depends, though.
Comments