
Twin Dragons page 214: Demonstration
And here we see a long overdue demonstration :D
As always, if you like the comic, please consider donating on my Patreon. Even one dollar goes a long way.
Don’t forget that I stream every Sunday! You are more than welcome to join in on the fun.
The stream is hold at the following hour:
UTC: 1PM
EDT: 9AM
PDT: 6AM
CEST: 3PM
Don’t forget to vote for Twin Dragons at Topwebcomics!
http://topwebcomics.com/vote/21879
Thanks for voting!
previous | start | next
As always, if you like the comic, please consider donating on my Patreon. Even one dollar goes a long way.
Don’t forget that I stream every Sunday! You are more than welcome to join in on the fun.
The stream is hold at the following hour:
UTC: 1PM
EDT: 9AM
PDT: 6AM
CEST: 3PM
Don’t forget to vote for Twin Dragons at Topwebcomics!
http://topwebcomics.com/vote/21879
Thanks for voting!
previous | start | next
Category Artwork (Digital) / Comics
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 980 x 695px
File Size 588.7 kB
Listed in Folders
Rare is not the same as doesn't exist. I get that probably a lot of scaly kids would probably try and say they are dragons, but if they actually exist you should probably ask the parents if you aren't sure. Not just assume the kid is lying. /shrug Consider this doctor educated now.
Given that the whole Hybrid thing is still A) A new thing B) not rare but uncommon C) mythical hybrids are an Uncommon of an Uncommon
Its not too contrived to meet a stickler doctor who just thinks rare sightings of such are unfounded exaggerations.
After all despite oil companies knowing about tectonic plate movement many in the scientific community still disputed it even after evidence was brought in by the man who died trying to show case it. Same thing with many scientists on probability screaming "We deal in facts solid evidence not wibbly wobbly clouds of statistics. But the Manhattan project proved that proability is baked into the rules of nature and now all scientist are so use to it they don't realize they even do it now adays saying we are 97.99999980001%
certain. Science are no there is always someone who thinks they know better why we have double blind studies
Its not too contrived to meet a stickler doctor who just thinks rare sightings of such are unfounded exaggerations.
After all despite oil companies knowing about tectonic plate movement many in the scientific community still disputed it even after evidence was brought in by the man who died trying to show case it. Same thing with many scientists on probability screaming "We deal in facts solid evidence not wibbly wobbly clouds of statistics. But the Manhattan project proved that proability is baked into the rules of nature and now all scientist are so use to it they don't realize they even do it now adays saying we are 97.99999980001%
certain. Science are no there is always someone who thinks they know better why we have double blind studies
The first thing I thought about: https://www.deviantart.com/twokinds.....r-me-790161162
Comments