
It's the penultimate page, folks!
I'm starting to regret my choice of a cheetah as one of the main characters of this story arc. Darn spots are gonna drive me crazy at some point... maybe I'll give him such a scare that they fall off, save some trouble.
Oh, I took the liberty of actually researching gold prices in the early 1980s. I speculate that the value of gold shot through the roof in response to the inflation of the previous decade and a global economic downturn not dissimilar to what's happening now. $380 an ounce was not the highest it got, but like any overpriced commodity the bubble eventually burst.
<<< PREV | FIRST | NEXT >>>
I'm starting to regret my choice of a cheetah as one of the main characters of this story arc. Darn spots are gonna drive me crazy at some point... maybe I'll give him such a scare that they fall off, save some trouble.
Oh, I took the liberty of actually researching gold prices in the early 1980s. I speculate that the value of gold shot through the roof in response to the inflation of the previous decade and a global economic downturn not dissimilar to what's happening now. $380 an ounce was not the highest it got, but like any overpriced commodity the bubble eventually burst.
<<< PREV | FIRST | NEXT >>>
Category Artwork (Digital) / Comics
Species Dog (Other)
Size 690 x 966px
File Size 320.2 kB
Diamonds are lighter, but pretty difficult to fence off. They lose a chunk of their value in the transition to hard cash. Gold is comparatively very easy to smuggle and holds its value through transactions better. As for the small amount of gold, in early 1982 gold was still incredibly overvalued and so a little carried a lot of value. That would soon change- drastically.
The one thing I love about this page are Fred's ears. You did a good job having them fit his expressions in each panel. I also like how you had him actually listen to what the cheetah had to say. Then there's the story itself.. what can I say? It has a lot of twists and turns that should keep the reader interested. It has me hooked.
Not exactly the turn of events I'd anticipated! Looking forward to more.
For just a moment viewing the lower-left panel, I thought someone had put some sort of wood-inletted piece into the stock of that FAL50.64. Or is it a hack-job of an FNC receiver with a FAL front end? It has a couple of issues little issues, but I'm more nitpicky about that line of rifles than most, having assembled and smithed a few in my time.
FALs are such long, slender, sexy beasts. Extremely accurate as semi-autos go, too...Providing you're careful with your tolerances.
(Pssst, that big receiver hinge screw goes right behind the magazine, not over its middle. ;) )
For just a moment viewing the lower-left panel, I thought someone had put some sort of wood-inletted piece into the stock of that FAL50.64. Or is it a hack-job of an FNC receiver with a FAL front end? It has a couple of issues little issues, but I'm more nitpicky about that line of rifles than most, having assembled and smithed a few in my time.
FALs are such long, slender, sexy beasts. Extremely accurate as semi-autos go, too...Providing you're careful with your tolerances.
(Pssst, that big receiver hinge screw goes right behind the magazine, not over its middle. ;) )
No real way to tell 50.63 from 50.64 receivers (Both of which are para receivers, I just have more experience with the 64) without a metallurgy test or a serial number. The .64s tended to have the L1A1 style folding charging lever but since that isn't a PART of the receiver and it's compatible with most FAL receiver types, that's not really any sort of reliable indicator. The .64 had a full-length (as opposed to shortened) barrel, so a .64 series receiver with a SHORT barrel would be a hack, as would a .63 with a LONG barrel...
So it's either a .64 or a .63 hack.
My personal experience is with 50.41-type versions of the (non-para models, with the recoil spring built into the stock, so entirely unable to be 'kitted' to fold) C1A1 and with a couple that I assembled and gunsmithed piecemeal with the help of a primary FAL parts clearing house in the U.S. which broke down literal tons of armory sell-offs, finding parts from various different makes that were slightly larger than necessary in the critical dimensions and slowly polishing (not much filing) them down to perfection where appropriate to create chimeras that were primarily L1A1/C1A1, but with some Kiwi, Brazilian IMBEL and Israeli parts (I'm particularly fond of the Israeli chrome-lined heavy barrels that were then groove-milled to increase stiffness and surface area. I've never seen one of the Makleon barrels that didn't have a dead-on chamber and clean crown and rifling, all good accuracy characteristics to start evaluating from.).
...Which is why I commented that they could be extremely accurate if you're careful with your tolerances in building them.
So it's either a .64 or a .63 hack.
My personal experience is with 50.41-type versions of the (non-para models, with the recoil spring built into the stock, so entirely unable to be 'kitted' to fold) C1A1 and with a couple that I assembled and gunsmithed piecemeal with the help of a primary FAL parts clearing house in the U.S. which broke down literal tons of armory sell-offs, finding parts from various different makes that were slightly larger than necessary in the critical dimensions and slowly polishing (not much filing) them down to perfection where appropriate to create chimeras that were primarily L1A1/C1A1, but with some Kiwi, Brazilian IMBEL and Israeli parts (I'm particularly fond of the Israeli chrome-lined heavy barrels that were then groove-milled to increase stiffness and surface area. I've never seen one of the Makleon barrels that didn't have a dead-on chamber and clean crown and rifling, all good accuracy characteristics to start evaluating from.).
...Which is why I commented that they could be extremely accurate if you're careful with your tolerances in building them.
It's actually a little creepy how similar the values of gold in 1981 were to the value of gold today- if you adjust for inflation. In 1982 the gold market collapsed, and a lot of economists are worried that something similar will happen to today's overpriced gold. Then again, things seldom happen exactly the same way twice.
Of course! I would never doubt.
By the way... have you noticed how much more expensive groceries and imported consumer commodities have gotten? I sure wish they'd print that money up faster... that'll fix the problem... I mean, if everyone has enough money, then everybody is happy right?
By the way... have you noticed how much more expensive groceries and imported consumer commodities have gotten? I sure wish they'd print that money up faster... that'll fix the problem... I mean, if everyone has enough money, then everybody is happy right?
Comments