
Okay. Most folks are gonna hate this one, as there's not really a whole lot of anything earth-shattering here. This was one that I'm putting it up for all those artists out there who want something for reference as far as fore-quarters reference for cat anatomy, upsidedown though it might be.
This is Drifter, my eldest son, and he's having a lazy afternoon, and is actually getting a bit upset with me that I'm taking pictures when I should be paying attention to him, darnit!
What I like about this photo is that it really shows nicely all the shoulder musculature - and even shoulder blade - in Drifter's right shoulder, and he's flexing the claws of his left forepaw just a little bit, so the muscles in his left foreleg are quite visible. They're actually always like that, claw-flex or not, but this pic really shows it off nicely.
The other thing of noteworthy comment is the size of his paws. So here's a feline trivia comment for everyone out there: forepaws are bigger than hind-paws. In this case, Drifter got into the forepaw line twice. For reference, the chain-link in the pic is 2-inch (5cm) squares, and you can see that Drifter's forepaws are easily two-squares wide. That's really big for a 130-lb kitty! He looked totally silly as a kitten, and quite literally never grew into them.
I should also note that most folks might find the paws to look a little odd in the flat position that they are. But in truth, this is the real thing, folks! Drifter is 100% intact, and has all 18-claws still in his possession! I'm looking for a reference pic for claws still, but that will come eventually. That probably brings up my next cat trivia item for the day: Cats only have dewclaws on the forepaws, not the rear. So that means they have five claws for each forepaw, but only four claws on each rear, so only 18 claws (not 20 like is commonly believed) total. :) Part two of that is that the dewclaws are the biggest, being about 30% larger than the others. So imagine on something like a tiger, they're just...huge.
So overall, I think the artists interested in total "realism" and "anatomical accuracy" will find this picture fascinating. For me, it's just more showing off of my beloved son, Drifter! In any case, I hope everyone finds something to like about it.
This picture was taken 01-Jul-03. The image was taken with a Canon EOS 10D and the EF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 USM lens. The original was taken at full frame of 3072x2048x24b, ISO eqv 400, 1/60 shutter, f/4.5. This image was cropped and shrunken down for space conservation.
Disclaimer: I hate to have to put this on here, but the pic is copyright me. Please do not distribute, copy, alter, etc, without my permission. Having said all that, feel free to download and use it for your own inspiration.
This is Drifter, my eldest son, and he's having a lazy afternoon, and is actually getting a bit upset with me that I'm taking pictures when I should be paying attention to him, darnit!
What I like about this photo is that it really shows nicely all the shoulder musculature - and even shoulder blade - in Drifter's right shoulder, and he's flexing the claws of his left forepaw just a little bit, so the muscles in his left foreleg are quite visible. They're actually always like that, claw-flex or not, but this pic really shows it off nicely.
The other thing of noteworthy comment is the size of his paws. So here's a feline trivia comment for everyone out there: forepaws are bigger than hind-paws. In this case, Drifter got into the forepaw line twice. For reference, the chain-link in the pic is 2-inch (5cm) squares, and you can see that Drifter's forepaws are easily two-squares wide. That's really big for a 130-lb kitty! He looked totally silly as a kitten, and quite literally never grew into them.
I should also note that most folks might find the paws to look a little odd in the flat position that they are. But in truth, this is the real thing, folks! Drifter is 100% intact, and has all 18-claws still in his possession! I'm looking for a reference pic for claws still, but that will come eventually. That probably brings up my next cat trivia item for the day: Cats only have dewclaws on the forepaws, not the rear. So that means they have five claws for each forepaw, but only four claws on each rear, so only 18 claws (not 20 like is commonly believed) total. :) Part two of that is that the dewclaws are the biggest, being about 30% larger than the others. So imagine on something like a tiger, they're just...huge.
So overall, I think the artists interested in total "realism" and "anatomical accuracy" will find this picture fascinating. For me, it's just more showing off of my beloved son, Drifter! In any case, I hope everyone finds something to like about it.
This picture was taken 01-Jul-03. The image was taken with a Canon EOS 10D and the EF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 USM lens. The original was taken at full frame of 3072x2048x24b, ISO eqv 400, 1/60 shutter, f/4.5. This image was cropped and shrunken down for space conservation.
Disclaimer: I hate to have to put this on here, but the pic is copyright me. Please do not distribute, copy, alter, etc, without my permission. Having said all that, feel free to download and use it for your own inspiration.
Category Photography / Animal related (non-anthro)
Species Feline (Other)
Size 1024 x 759px
File Size 102.4 kB
and so the conspiracy continues M'Lord ;)! I really LOVE this picture for the precise reason of how much of the underlying anatomy it shows in the paws especially. Its interesting sometimes just seeing how similar the basic structure of all mammals is..ie their paws look so much like hands, especially when stretched out as they are here!
(Shasta smiles deviantly once again) Indeed, M'Lady. I chose this particular picture with the conspir...er...I mean /you/ in mind. :)
Cougars are simply amazing. They can grip thing with their paws, even without claws. They can climb a tree without even flexing out their daggers. They are incredibly dextrous.
Cougars are simply amazing. They can grip thing with their paws, even without claws. They can climb a tree without even flexing out their daggers. They are incredibly dextrous.
When Drifter was younger, he was extremely tolerant of my handling his paws, so even today, he puts up with it pretty well. He's not quite as tolerant as he was as a kitten, but considering most cats, he doesn't care at all!
I've actually "played" with his forepaws a few times and gotten him to completely flex out his claws for me to "inspect". I need to look for a few claw pix for reference.
I think the whole paw-touch thing it about trust. If a cat really trusts you, then you can do just about anything with them. If they don't, then you might end up cat-food. :)
I've actually "played" with his forepaws a few times and gotten him to completely flex out his claws for me to "inspect". I need to look for a few claw pix for reference.
I think the whole paw-touch thing it about trust. If a cat really trusts you, then you can do just about anything with them. If they don't, then you might end up cat-food. :)
That is very very true, even with domesticated cats, I found it takes more work to gain their trust. Chances are this is why I was the only person in town that folks brought their cats to to get groomed ;). Apparantly people were amazed that their 'usually viscious' cats seemed to tolerate just about anything from me but would just about kill any other groomer that attempted such. I wonder sometimes if this would translate the same way to big cats. I think cats are the hardest of animals to predict, their body language is so much more subtle than say canines...but I always felt as though I was more intune with cats than any other animals I was ever around. Again thank you for this photo, I will certainly be logging it away :D!
I think that all animals, big and small, have an ability to sense "who" we are, as in out soul and spirit and nature. They just.../know/.
I've found that the best "litmus test" for humanity is a leopard. If a leopard snarls and growls at someone - I mean the totally if-the-wasn't-a-cage-in-the-way-thay'd-be-dead kinda snarl/growl - then they're a person that you /definitely/ want to avoid. It is the truest test of the "inner nature" of a person, and I've never seen the leopard be wrong.
Animals have a very keen sense about people. It's been said that an animals will know more about you in the first few seconds of meeting you than friends and colleagues will know you in a lifetime. I think there's a lot of truth to that. They just /know/. :)
I've found that the best "litmus test" for humanity is a leopard. If a leopard snarls and growls at someone - I mean the totally if-the-wasn't-a-cage-in-the-way-thay'd-be-dead kinda snarl/growl - then they're a person that you /definitely/ want to avoid. It is the truest test of the "inner nature" of a person, and I've never seen the leopard be wrong.
Animals have a very keen sense about people. It's been said that an animals will know more about you in the first few seconds of meeting you than friends and colleagues will know you in a lifetime. I think there's a lot of truth to that. They just /know/. :)
I've never done the DNA testing to sub-species ident him (as it's expensive), but given a few little tell-tales, my best guess would be Texas sub-species.
The whole paw-size thing was mostly in jest, but even given the other cougars I've worked with, Drifter's paws are huge. For example, Dagger's forepaws were just slightly larger than Drifter's, yet, he was twice Drifter's size and weight in overall body structure. So there's a lot of fact to the jest.
The whole paw-size thing was mostly in jest, but even given the other cougars I've worked with, Drifter's paws are huge. For example, Dagger's forepaws were just slightly larger than Drifter's, yet, he was twice Drifter's size and weight in overall body structure. So there's a lot of fact to the jest.
I've been meaning to ask the administrators if they could add a new feline category. I mean, they've got most of the others represented as "feline - something" so why not cougars?
I'm not sure why it bothers me, but it does. And all things considered, there seemed to be a lot of cougar people here on FA, so that seems to make it all the more appropriate. Not that I'm cougar-biased or anything. :)
I'm not sure why it bothers me, but it does. And all things considered, there seemed to be a lot of cougar people here on FA, so that seems to make it all the more appropriate. Not that I'm cougar-biased or anything. :)
Hmmm. I'll probably get the "nope!", especially with all the server probs, but who knows? If I ask, the worse they can do is say "no", right? On the other paw...er...hand, maybe they'll do it.
Also, I'm wondering, exactly, what is a "feline - cat"? Isn't that a bit redundant? :) Is that opposed to a...er..."feline - dog"?
Also, I'm wondering, exactly, what is a "feline - cat"? Isn't that a bit redundant? :) Is that opposed to a...er..."feline - dog"?
Comments