FA+
Shop
528
Views
Views
31
Favorites
Favorites
Category
All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 640 x 480
File Size 101.6 kB
Report this content
★
More from Jyinxx
My new Authentic Gay Boy Friend
LOL yes hes gay XD
<3 u
kazewolf
<3 u
kazewolf
･:*:･｡,★'________★________'★,｡･:*:･
Check out my webcomic
The Chronicles of Huxcyn
Caught in Orbit
Please consider supporting my webcomics on 
Patreon
Check out The Kemono Cafe ★ Jyinxx’s Tea House
Vote for The Chronicles of Huxcyn
★ 
Twitter ★ 
Picarto ★
Ko-fi ★
･:*:･｡,★'________★________'★,｡･:*:･ 
Category All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 640 x 480px
File Size 101.6 kB
Uh... no... heterosexual or straight women like men, homosexual, gay or lesbian women like girls, the terms are interchangable for a women that is attracted to other women.
In addition he was speaking of Xizz affecting Kaze's sexuality, even if you had been correct I would still have been speaking of the inverse.
In addition he was speaking of Xizz affecting Kaze's sexuality, even if you had been correct I would still have been speaking of the inverse.
well i GOT all that, but youve gotta use yer outta the box thinker here for a sec.
gay is usually used to refer to male male relations
lez refering to girl girl
so in a abstract way, calling a girl gay means she likes guys, and calling a guy lez means he likes girls.
but then again you gotta be thinking creatively.
gay is usually used to refer to male male relations
lez refering to girl girl
so in a abstract way, calling a girl gay means she likes guys, and calling a guy lez means he likes girls.
but then again you gotta be thinking creatively.
Now you're the one misunderstanding, I understood the intended wordplay, I just took it upon myself to point out how annoying it was to try and arbitrarily change the meanings of those words through redundant and POTENTIALLY confusing wordplay, in addition your final statement that it "was the same thing" to what the comment I was replying to suggested is still incorrect as Brian was speaking of Xizzy affecting Kaze's sexuality, whereas I was speaking of him affecting hers, so the joke was fundamentally flawed.
the you truely are lost if you feel the need to point out flaws.
there are already too many grammar nazis. theyre called english teachers for a reason.
if you didnt like it then you shouldnt have commented. and what you fail to realize is not only that i do not care what you think about it, but also that you will not win an arguement with me when i am not argueing but merely stating how things will play out with or without your consent.
there are already too many grammar nazis. theyre called english teachers for a reason.
if you didnt like it then you shouldnt have commented. and what you fail to realize is not only that i do not care what you think about it, but also that you will not win an arguement with me when i am not argueing but merely stating how things will play out with or without your consent.
Ironic that the "Grammer Nazi" argument would come from someone who corrected Xizzy's grammer and spelling in a comment on this same piece...
And in response to your claim to be only stating how things are, that is equally the nature of what I am trying to say, it's just that the "realities" we choose to subscribe to are in direct opposition to each other.
And if I might add one more thing, you obviosuly care on some level if you persist in replying.
And in response to your claim to be only stating how things are, that is equally the nature of what I am trying to say, it's just that the "realities" we choose to subscribe to are in direct opposition to each other.
And if I might add one more thing, you obviosuly care on some level if you persist in replying.
Look... I'm not doing this to be offensive, I just found your initial addition to the conversation to be rather annoying and without point, I was making an inverse joke to match Brian's and then you come in with one that tried to turn things on their head in a way I felt was accusing me of being wrong, should I have said "Or maybe he will turn her lesbian" instead to fit with your use of the terminology?
yeah, i guess i can agree with that, granted it didnt help that you kinda misinterpreted.
brian got it, and even tho it may have been a bit reachy, it was still something that you coulda let go of instead of continueing on about it.
i mean if ya cant think abstract, then something is wrong with this world. (not you specifically, you as in the human species entirely)
brian got it, and even tho it may have been a bit reachy, it was still something that you coulda let go of instead of continueing on about it.
i mean if ya cant think abstract, then something is wrong with this world. (not you specifically, you as in the human species entirely)
mmhmm, yahoo and msn
yahoo: kuraixoji
msn: schlechtertodd[at]live.com
NONE OF YOU COMMENT LURCHERS ADD ME
yahoo: kuraixoji
msn: schlechtertodd[at]live.com
NONE OF YOU COMMENT LURCHERS ADD ME
i used this picture as a background for a PowerPoint slide in school, and everyone thought it was me & this chick i hang out with...
i was like "...... no..... he's gay...." and then the bastards said "but aren't you gay?" aaaand then it was something like this... -gives the guy who said it a flirty look, walk up to him, get real close to him.... "only-" punch the fuck out of him "-HALF!" -stomp the fuck out of his nuts while hes on the floor while repeatedly shouting "DO I LOOK GAY NOW?? DO AI?"
i was like "...... no..... he's gay...." and then the bastards said "but aren't you gay?" aaaand then it was something like this... -gives the guy who said it a flirty look, walk up to him, get real close to him.... "only-" punch the fuck out of him "-HALF!" -stomp the fuck out of his nuts while hes on the floor while repeatedly shouting "DO I LOOK GAY NOW?? DO AI?"
Comments