
Yeah there is nothing furry or anthropomorphic about this piece but it is still an interesting piece and it unfortunately shows all to clearly the importance about double checking your reference before using it!
This was suppose to be the cover art for a failed 1990s Steam Punk magazine that never got its first issue out the door. I never got paid but I still have the original art. This was before Steam Punk was "in" and most folks didn't even know what a Babbage engine was.
Now the cautionary tale about reference. First and most obvious is the Union Jack in the background! When I did this piece I had no good examples of the Jack and I used another artist's painting of one the Jack for my piece. Unfortunately they got it wrong and I just perpetuated the mistake. Lesson. If you are using reference it is always best to have multiple source and to use material as close to the original source as possible. In hindsight taking the time look at the library for a book on flags or even British history would have served me better.
Second reference faux paux is the rocket in the background. Actually rather proud of the rocket, and still like the BOAC lettering on the side of it. Where I fell down is on the flame coming out of the nozzle. The reference photo I used was of a rocket already in flight at about 80,000 ft. At that altitude the atmosphere is much thinner and exhaust from the nozzle flares out much more than at sea level. Compare it to my last posting here on FA http://www.furaffinity.net/full/3853393/ Of course this error had to be pointed out to me in the middle of an artist reception at a con by a guy who worked at NASA! Now "Heading Out" was done several years later when I was much wiser in the ways of illustration, so I am more cautious now.
This was suppose to be the cover art for a failed 1990s Steam Punk magazine that never got its first issue out the door. I never got paid but I still have the original art. This was before Steam Punk was "in" and most folks didn't even know what a Babbage engine was.
Now the cautionary tale about reference. First and most obvious is the Union Jack in the background! When I did this piece I had no good examples of the Jack and I used another artist's painting of one the Jack for my piece. Unfortunately they got it wrong and I just perpetuated the mistake. Lesson. If you are using reference it is always best to have multiple source and to use material as close to the original source as possible. In hindsight taking the time look at the library for a book on flags or even British history would have served me better.
Second reference faux paux is the rocket in the background. Actually rather proud of the rocket, and still like the BOAC lettering on the side of it. Where I fell down is on the flame coming out of the nozzle. The reference photo I used was of a rocket already in flight at about 80,000 ft. At that altitude the atmosphere is much thinner and exhaust from the nozzle flares out much more than at sea level. Compare it to my last posting here on FA http://www.furaffinity.net/full/3853393/ Of course this error had to be pointed out to me in the middle of an artist reception at a con by a guy who worked at NASA! Now "Heading Out" was done several years later when I was much wiser in the ways of illustration, so I am more cautious now.
Category All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 655 x 878px
File Size 93.7 kB
Magnificent illustration for a future that could have been...
I'm wondering if you ever considered to do illustrations about the British Interplanetary Society lunar lander project of 1937... It sure has a strong steam-punk flavour, with its mix of Jules Verne's motives and nec-plus-ultra technologies for its time :
http://www.astronautix.com/craft/bisander.htm
http://davidszondy.com/future/space/bis_solid.jpg
I'm wondering if you ever considered to do illustrations about the British Interplanetary Society lunar lander project of 1937... It sure has a strong steam-punk flavour, with its mix of Jules Verne's motives and nec-plus-ultra technologies for its time :
http://www.astronautix.com/craft/bisander.htm
http://davidszondy.com/future/space/bis_solid.jpg
My thoughts on the rocket exhaust :
It looks like a poster for a 50s B-Movie...
They didnt know about such effects as atmospheric pressure on rocket exhausts, so went ahead and used 'big powerfull looking' flames.
I say it fits, and physics be damned!
Just like the rocket really, that'd be an areodymanic nightmare I'm sure.
I remember a couple of years back, hearing about someone that actualy built a rocket based on the one that Tintin had, and they had to use I think it was four times the power to get it to lift off that they should have, just to overcome the drag of the fins.
Still.. realistic or not, fins on a retro style rocket still look cool in my opinion, and I'm not just saying that because I'm a brit ^_^
It looks like a poster for a 50s B-Movie...
They didnt know about such effects as atmospheric pressure on rocket exhausts, so went ahead and used 'big powerfull looking' flames.
I say it fits, and physics be damned!
Just like the rocket really, that'd be an areodymanic nightmare I'm sure.
I remember a couple of years back, hearing about someone that actualy built a rocket based on the one that Tintin had, and they had to use I think it was four times the power to get it to lift off that they should have, just to overcome the drag of the fins.
Still.. realistic or not, fins on a retro style rocket still look cool in my opinion, and I'm not just saying that because I'm a brit ^_^
Despite the errors you point out, that's still a beautiful work. I love the classic 1950's spaceship (*chuckle* reminds me of a day in the middle '70's when I was watching the Soyuz launch fo the ASTP on one channel and "Rocketship X-M" on another; rather an "interesting" juxtaposition). Yeah, at 80KFT you'd have a lot more flare (I don't work for NASA, but I've dealt with solid rocket motors for government use).
Comments