nice, in good contition too, great find

*condition

It's a good "20 footer" looks fine far enough away but has its share of issues. Most everything on it works fine though and it was an abuse free 5.0 which is hard to find.

the last "good" mustang.

I dont know about that. Lets see about the new 5.slow.... I mean the new "real" 5.0...

well...the reason why the 5.0 was a good engine was because it was attached to a pinto body that weighed nothing. not the 3 ton ugly heep of junk they have now.

Pssss... I know the fox be fast. But the new Mustang be lighter than the Challenger and the Camaro. The fox body cant reallllly have a big ass engine. I member when a mag installed a new triton v8 on one and it couldn't get traction since it was so front heavy. I think you can install the new 5.0 on the fox but would be hard for the simple reason its dual overhead. and that dual overhead just takes tooo much room... So the 5.0 is limited to engines. I will keep the 302 or use the svo engine with a volvo head swap.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhiHBVgV0xU

lx 5.0 3160 lbs
new 5.0 3875 lbs

I just feel safer with 700 pounds of safety protecting me.

What's unsafe about the tissue paper body strength of a 5.0 convertible? To quote my old boss at the shop I worked at. "Oh! You bought one of the Mustangs that the doors are the only thing holding it together!"

http://motavated.deviantart.com/gallery/#/dkb7xq

That was my 1966 mustang A code hard top. yeah.... They are not very safe. Shit happens. And you know damn well your looking for trouble driving any Mustang. HAHAHAHA!

Yo Dawg, I herd you like Foxes, so I put a fox in your fox....

I like these Mustangs.

Just picked up my own 93 GT convertible, the thing was a garage baby with only 77,000 original miles on it. Plan on keeping mine for years after, great cars!