
An older pic of the sort of stuff I used to be better known for; furry military history.
Pictured is a member of Napoleon's Imperial Guard circa the height of the first empire post 1800.
I was actually recreating this uniform for an impression at one point- but the cost of the correct grenade badges, wool and buttons finally caused me to scrap the project.
Pictured is a member of Napoleon's Imperial Guard circa the height of the first empire post 1800.
I was actually recreating this uniform for an impression at one point- but the cost of the correct grenade badges, wool and buttons finally caused me to scrap the project.
Category All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 593 x 800px
File Size 209.2 kB
Nope- pose is taken straight from the bayonet manual of arms for the french army of the time.
There are a lot of weird looking postures in those manuals- but they were intended to standardize maneuvers for musketry and bayonet drill for masses of closely packed men who all had to move in unison to respond to threats from any direction.
There are a lot of weird looking postures in those manuals- but they were intended to standardize maneuvers for musketry and bayonet drill for masses of closely packed men who all had to move in unison to respond to threats from any direction.
It's a great pose.
My impression is that up to, say, the US Civil War, infantrymen were spear carriers. The fact their spears could shoot lead balls was secondary in the minds of their officers, and in their training.
I also get the impression that this mindset continued long after the time rifled muskets made the average battlefield firearm deadly out to hundreds of yards. And that the soldiers' training continued to be bayonet-centered until the officers trained in the smoothbore era died off, and beyond. Although (popular drawings of battlefield scenes to the contrary) the soldiers generally had the sense to take cover once in actual battle.
True? False? Maybe?
My impression is that up to, say, the US Civil War, infantrymen were spear carriers. The fact their spears could shoot lead balls was secondary in the minds of their officers, and in their training.
I also get the impression that this mindset continued long after the time rifled muskets made the average battlefield firearm deadly out to hundreds of yards. And that the soldiers' training continued to be bayonet-centered until the officers trained in the smoothbore era died off, and beyond. Although (popular drawings of battlefield scenes to the contrary) the soldiers generally had the sense to take cover once in actual battle.
True? False? Maybe?
Comments