
Was watching
sikes livestreaming with my bf, and got inspired to draw his g-shep character, Roland.
GEEEEEEEEEEESCHEP GRIN!

GEEEEEEEEEEESCHEP GRIN!
Category Artwork (Traditional) / General Furry Art
Species Dog (Other)
Size 875 x 1153px
File Size 174.4 kB
The expression on his face is good. Basic anatomy is good as well, the curve of the ab is nice. His nose seems a bit off. The ears are pretty awesome and the most confident part of this drawing is the happy trail. The impression of the paw under the shirt I dig, but the thumb is kinda odd too. The pants hang well. Actually your anatomy is REALLY good. Very proportional. Dig the forearms he most. The nose is at a frontal view. Noticable. This picture's expression is very weird. Not in a bad way. The emotion being expressed by the subject looking away yet smiling is interesting. What do you think the look on his face says? Bashful? Curious? Look at my body not at my face?
I know the nose is off! x__X That's what I get for free-drawing stoned with no under-sketching. Ugh. And I can't draw hands, no matter how much I practice, oh well.
The facial expression was supposed to be the interstitial look between making brief eye contact to gauge interest, then the intense look of desire. He knows he's sexy, he's not making eye contact as he pulls his shirt up because he's a little shy, but he believes other people when they tell him he's hot, so he's going to reaffirm eye contact to establish a connection.
Either that or he's looking at someone off-screen. o_o I just realized it could read either way.
Thanks for the critique.
The facial expression was supposed to be the interstitial look between making brief eye contact to gauge interest, then the intense look of desire. He knows he's sexy, he's not making eye contact as he pulls his shirt up because he's a little shy, but he believes other people when they tell him he's hot, so he's going to reaffirm eye contact to establish a connection.
Either that or he's looking at someone off-screen. o_o I just realized it could read either way.
Thanks for the critique.
Comments