
True, everybody's got things they like about
their mate. Then there's the things they
really like (no, it's not that kind of sonnet
this week).
But a married bunny and a wolf. It is possible
there's something about him she *really* likes...
(Wonder if any artists will notice this one; could be neat to see.)
...............................................................................
......
................................................................................
......
................................................................................
......
Note: The Thursday Prompt that got this one written
was 'every day.'
LINK TO: Text Version
<<<< To Wolf and Bunny Table of Contents
their mate. Then there's the things they
really like (no, it's not that kind of sonnet
this week).
But a married bunny and a wolf. It is possible
there's something about him she *really* likes...
(Wonder if any artists will notice this one; could be neat to see.)
...............................................................................
......
................................................................................
......
................................................................................
......
>>>>> On Mildly Unnatural Jealousy (#22) -- Spoken Word <<<<<
By Fred Brown, Dec 7/2011
fwbrown61
Copyright 2011 All rights reserved, all commercial
infringements prosecuted, website display permission
available upon request. Non-personal distro is infringement.
Recorded on Mar 4/22
Note: The Thursday Prompt that got this one written
was 'every day.'
LINK TO: Text Version
<<<< To Wolf and Bunny Table of Contents
Category Music / All
Species Rabbit / Hare
Size 120 x 120px
File Size 2.51 MB
Another one on the fave list, for being both perfect in style and very well-loaded with ideas. Ie., scent matters to furs, does it? Yes it does. And why not a wolf-bunny? Hey Neuromanson, got a commish for ya...
(No I don't. Poor as church mouse. Mo' poor; a church mouse has a church to live in.)
And peek under the hood of this sonnet, hmmm? Do I not assert that furs are [technologically] created creatures--if modifications are possible--and not merely 'fable-creatures?' As most fur writing or art portrays furs. A small SF subcurrent has been snuck in without anyone noticing.
And how many people would 'Take the Furry Treatment,' if it was actually possible? Wait, wait, bigger question: *Why* would people do it? Ah, well now, a certain writer has an 'origin story' to scribble out one of these days. (It involves bunnies).
Okay: Gotta live long enough first, but details, details. :- )
fwbrown61
(No I don't. Poor as church mouse. Mo' poor; a church mouse has a church to live in.)
And peek under the hood of this sonnet, hmmm? Do I not assert that furs are [technologically] created creatures--if modifications are possible--and not merely 'fable-creatures?' As most fur writing or art portrays furs. A small SF subcurrent has been snuck in without anyone noticing.
And how many people would 'Take the Furry Treatment,' if it was actually possible? Wait, wait, bigger question: *Why* would people do it? Ah, well now, a certain writer has an 'origin story' to scribble out one of these days. (It involves bunnies).
Okay: Gotta live long enough first, but details, details. :- )

Comments