
I recently saw Turning Red, and I couldn't pass up the opportunity to make a tickle drawing, all the girls are so adorable, I'm sure this would be a good scene for the movie.
Category Artwork (Digital) / Fanart
Species Red Panda
Size 1280 x 1280px
File Size 371.7 kB
The picture in question is not explicit or lewd. It's a bunch of gloves tickling a cartoon character. Oh the horror!!
You must really lead a really sheltered life if you think this is pedophilia. Either that or you're just stupid. Or perhaps you feel that everything on FA is p0rn by default.
I spotted artwork in your gallery of a collared Pachirisu. They're very animalistic in design, they're basically squirrels. By your logic, you're into bestiality.
You must really lead a really sheltered life if you think this is pedophilia. Either that or you're just stupid. Or perhaps you feel that everything on FA is p0rn by default.
I spotted artwork in your gallery of a collared Pachirisu. They're very animalistic in design, they're basically squirrels. By your logic, you're into bestiality.
Anthromorphic, hmm. Hardly. They're still a squirrel at the end of the day. Using your logic here, you're pretty much a zoophile. I'm not defending anything, I'm saying that your outrage is completely disproportionate.
But thankfully most people can discern between real life people and animals, and cartoons on a piece of paper. That you're so enraged over something that isn't even real is hilarious. Call me any name you want, it doesn't add anything except make you look childish. So does blocking me so I can't actually reply directly. Take your crocodile tears elsewhere, like at actual criminals. =)
But thankfully most people can discern between real life people and animals, and cartoons on a piece of paper. That you're so enraged over something that isn't even real is hilarious. Call me any name you want, it doesn't add anything except make you look childish. So does blocking me so I can't actually reply directly. Take your crocodile tears elsewhere, like at actual criminals. =)
But... it's not a child.
It's a red panda. A fictional character. Lol. Also, I didn't draw this picture.
Again, if we use your logic, that makes you a zoophile because you're fetishizing squirrels in your gallery. What's next? Telling a gore artist that they're a murderer or support murder? Get over yourself.
It's a red panda. A fictional character. Lol. Also, I didn't draw this picture.
Again, if we use your logic, that makes you a zoophile because you're fetishizing squirrels in your gallery. What's next? Telling a gore artist that they're a murderer or support murder? Get over yourself.
The purpose, quite frankly, is to just point and laugh at how outraged you are over something that is completely fictional. No one's shoving a cock in their mouth, ffs. Bleating out "durr you're a pedo" is just intellectually empty. Do you actually know what a pedophile even is? I'll give you a hint: someone who is aroused by kids. Someone calling you out on your sanctimonious, overreactive drivel does not make that so.
And it's not a tactic, that is the logic you're using here. You.
And it's not a tactic, that is the logic you're using here. You.
Statements not backed by any evidence. Just because you think there's explicit intent does not necessarily make you correct. I just took a look, their gallery has six pictures in it. None of them are remotely close to being pornographic. Nothing about those pictures suggests that they're aroused by tickling a child. Gonna need more proof than that, buster.
You're being very dishonest here, and quite frankly, I'm beginning to think you're just here purely for the outrage/clout points/whatever you want to call it. Go find something more worthy to use your outrage tokens over.
You're being very dishonest here, and quite frankly, I'm beginning to think you're just here purely for the outrage/clout points/whatever you want to call it. Go find something more worthy to use your outrage tokens over.
Comments