FA+
Shop
561
Views
Views
32
Favorites
Favorites
Category
All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1280 x 1000
File Size 1.15 MB
Report this content
More from FrankyZaraki
This is a redo of an old pic I did: https://www.furaffinity.net/view/36129697/
Just a very silly idea I had with my bro
BowserFan93, I think only the 90s kids may understand the reference hehehehe!! XD
Just a very silly idea I had with my bro
BowserFan93, I think only the 90s kids may understand the reference hehehehe!! XD
Category All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1280 x 1000px
File Size 1.15 MB
im not wrong tho. Thats what makes it ok for anthros to not wear clothes ^w^ Bugs bunny for example. They CAN wear clothes but don't have to.
who cares that a fox isn't wearing pants ^w^ he isnt 'human species. PLUS hes all fur covered.
Depending on circumstances a furry without clothes looks more normal than wearing certain outfits that exaggerate/ focus on certain area
"anatomy" also makes a difference. A fox that has fox stuff doesn't feel nude. Whereas human style stuff tend to look more so. Take my fursona for eg.
Hes an otter. he doesn't wear clothes. But he looks way more normal than he would with human stuff. A sheath reminds me more of a bulge if anything to actual nudity.
TLDR "nudity" isnt the same on anthros as on humans. Anthros (for the most part) can get away with it.
who cares that a fox isn't wearing pants ^w^ he isnt 'human species. PLUS hes all fur covered.
Depending on circumstances a furry without clothes looks more normal than wearing certain outfits that exaggerate/ focus on certain area
"anatomy" also makes a difference. A fox that has fox stuff doesn't feel nude. Whereas human style stuff tend to look more so. Take my fursona for eg.
Hes an otter. he doesn't wear clothes. But he looks way more normal than he would with human stuff. A sheath reminds me more of a bulge if anything to actual nudity.
TLDR "nudity" isnt the same on anthros as on humans. Anthros (for the most part) can get away with it.
Comments