SHUT UP EVERYONE!!!!
(\( * w *)/)
(\( * w *)/)
Category All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1000 x 723px
File Size 239.3 kB
How about in Gfx?
How about in actual proof of how much better it is than Playstation move?
Proove your standpoint..
You might like it yourself due to preferences, but in general attributes, Hardware and it's laser point mover..
The Playstation move beats it..
Kinect isn't even on that list.. It's waaay higher due to ratings and such :P
How about in actual proof of how much better it is than Playstation move?
Proove your standpoint..
You might like it yourself due to preferences, but in general attributes, Hardware and it's laser point mover..
The Playstation move beats it..
Kinect isn't even on that list.. It's waaay higher due to ratings and such :P
three things. One the wii has the worst video card of any new gen. console. Hell even the gamecube looked better. Two nothing good is on the wii, its gimmick is worn out and other consoles are gonna cash in by releasing a better motion detection system and games that are worth a damn. Three least with other consoles they wont recycle all the old shit like, mario, zelda, metroid...you know etc etc etc XD
The kinect doen't work worth crap. Oh, and better not wear black, because the kinect can't see you. Not to mention the Red Ring Of Death that has pleauged the 360 from the beginning.
As for games, ANYTHING THAT'S ON THE 360 WORKS BETTER ON THE PS3 OR THE PC.
The Wii was never trying to compete with the other two systems. The company went in it's own direction, and now PS3 and 360 are trying to catch up with the sales figures and great susess of the Wii.
So, you see, if the Wii sucks so much, WHY IS THE PS3 AND 360 TRYING TO EMULATE THE WII? WHY HAS THE WII OUTSOLD BOTH THE PS3 AND 360 COMBINED?
The answer: The Wii itself does not suck. The only problem with the Wii is the ocean of crappy games.
The 360 sucks. Anything that is 360 exclusive can be also played on the PC, and it works FAR better on the PC. Any other game is better on the PS3. And the 360 itself has so many issues.
So, sorry, but you have it wrong.
PS3>Wii>A Rock>360
As for games, ANYTHING THAT'S ON THE 360 WORKS BETTER ON THE PS3 OR THE PC.
The Wii was never trying to compete with the other two systems. The company went in it's own direction, and now PS3 and 360 are trying to catch up with the sales figures and great susess of the Wii.
So, you see, if the Wii sucks so much, WHY IS THE PS3 AND 360 TRYING TO EMULATE THE WII? WHY HAS THE WII OUTSOLD BOTH THE PS3 AND 360 COMBINED?
The answer: The Wii itself does not suck. The only problem with the Wii is the ocean of crappy games.
The 360 sucks. Anything that is 360 exclusive can be also played on the PC, and it works FAR better on the PC. Any other game is better on the PS3. And the 360 itself has so many issues.
So, sorry, but you have it wrong.
PS3>Wii>A Rock>360
Well, at the beginning when wii came out it was revolutinary. And that PS3 and XBox want to compete there I agree with you totally. But like with everything, you need to have something great to build something that is better. So just wait for Wii2. ;) With new controlers, like the Fleshlight, for games like Babysitting Cream. ;)
Lost Odyssey
Dead Rising - I very much do not count the bastardized Wii version that came later.
Beautiful Katamari - PS3 development for this particular Katamari game was canceled.
Crackdown
Chromehounds was fairly fun.
Fable 2 - Molyneux never delivers his promises but still not a bad game.
Halo - A few titles in the series are 360 only. I don't play it but a lot of people do. Personal opinion of these people doesn't count.
Ninja Gaiden II
Saints Row, first one
The racing games, I can't comment on being solid or not (Forza, Project Gotham, etc) as I am not into racing games and really don't follow how good they may or may not be.
Super Robot Wars XO .... oh hell yes, I didn't even know they made a Super Robot Wars for the 360. I gotta get that. :D
Did I get enough?
Dead Rising - I very much do not count the bastardized Wii version that came later.
Beautiful Katamari - PS3 development for this particular Katamari game was canceled.
Crackdown
Chromehounds was fairly fun.
Fable 2 - Molyneux never delivers his promises but still not a bad game.
Halo - A few titles in the series are 360 only. I don't play it but a lot of people do. Personal opinion of these people doesn't count.
Ninja Gaiden II
Saints Row, first one
The racing games, I can't comment on being solid or not (Forza, Project Gotham, etc) as I am not into racing games and really don't follow how good they may or may not be.
Super Robot Wars XO .... oh hell yes, I didn't even know they made a Super Robot Wars for the 360. I gotta get that. :D
Did I get enough?
First of all, HALO IS ON THE PC. And it's better there.
Second, An enhanced port of Ninja Gaiden II, called Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2 came out exclusively for PlayStation 3 and released on September 29, 2009. A FAR SUPERIOR GAME.
Third, Saints Row was on the PS3 as well.
Fourth, Super Robot Wars was titled GC, originally made for the Game Cube, and was then later PORTED TO THE 360 UNDER THE NAME XO, BUT IT'S THE SAME GAME.
Next, let's look at some overall scores, and anything less then 75% is considered to only be a "fair" title, not really all that special:
Lost Odyssey - 79.79%
Dead Rising - 85.12%
Beautiful Katamari - 72.82%
Crackdown - 83.16%
Chromehounds - 72.21%
Fable 2 - 88.27%
Eliminate games with ratings under 75%, and you have:
Lost Odyssey
Dead Rising
Crackdown
Fable 2
That's not saying much.
Now take a look at Wii and PS3 exclusive games. They are much higher rated, sell more, and are better games overall.
Not to mention the fact that the 360 claimed that the Wii would never catch on. Now look. The Kinect titles are exactly the same as the Wii crappy party games. (That's not to say PS3 isn't guilty of copying the Wii, but at least they never publicly proclaimed that the Wii would never catch on....)
Sorry, you may like your 360, but it pales in comparison to the 360 and Wii.
Second, An enhanced port of Ninja Gaiden II, called Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2 came out exclusively for PlayStation 3 and released on September 29, 2009. A FAR SUPERIOR GAME.
Third, Saints Row was on the PS3 as well.
Fourth, Super Robot Wars was titled GC, originally made for the Game Cube, and was then later PORTED TO THE 360 UNDER THE NAME XO, BUT IT'S THE SAME GAME.
Next, let's look at some overall scores, and anything less then 75% is considered to only be a "fair" title, not really all that special:
Lost Odyssey - 79.79%
Dead Rising - 85.12%
Beautiful Katamari - 72.82%
Crackdown - 83.16%
Chromehounds - 72.21%
Fable 2 - 88.27%
Eliminate games with ratings under 75%, and you have:
Lost Odyssey
Dead Rising
Crackdown
Fable 2
That's not saying much.
Now take a look at Wii and PS3 exclusive games. They are much higher rated, sell more, and are better games overall.
Not to mention the fact that the 360 claimed that the Wii would never catch on. Now look. The Kinect titles are exactly the same as the Wii crappy party games. (That's not to say PS3 isn't guilty of copying the Wii, but at least they never publicly proclaimed that the Wii would never catch on....)
Sorry, you may like your 360, but it pales in comparison to the 360 and Wii.
Now let's look at hardware:
CPU:
PS3:
Cell
3.2GHz
1 Main Core
512KB L2
7 Auxiliary SIMD Units
1.75MB Local Memory
217.6 GFLOPS
25.6 GB/s Memory
360:
IBM Xenon
3.2GHz
Three Cores
1MB Shared L2
115.2 GFLOPS
21.6 GB/s Interface
Wi:
IBM Broadway
729MHz
256KB L2
2.9 GFLOPS
1.9 GB/s Bus
Winner: PS3
Graphics:
PS3:
NVIDIA RSX
500MHz
24 Pixel Pipelines
8 Vertex Pipelines
250M Polygons/Sec
12G Texels/Sec
8G Samples/Sec
20.8 GB/s Memory
360:
ATI Xenos
500MHz
48 Unified Pipelines
500M Polygons/Sec
8G Texels/Sec
16G Samples/Sec
10MB Buffer (256 GB/s)
22.4 GB/s Memory
Wii:
ATI Hollywood
243MHz
975M Texels/Sec
3MB Buffer (27.3 GB/s)
7.9 GB/s Memory
Winner: Surprisingly, the 360.
Memory:
PS3:
256MB (25.6 GB/s)
256MB (20.8 GB/s)
20-320GB HDD
2x Blu-ray (72Mbps)
360:
512MB (22.4 GB/s)
20-250GB HDD
12x DVD (133Mbps)
Wii:
24MB (3.9 GB/s)
64MB (4 GB/s)
512MB Flash
8.5GB Optical Discs
Winner: PS3.
Overall, when dealing with just the hardware, the PS3 is the superior system.
And while the 360 may have better hardware than the Wii, the Wii has far better software support for it's hardware, something that the 360 cannot say.
CPU:
PS3:
Cell
3.2GHz
1 Main Core
512KB L2
7 Auxiliary SIMD Units
1.75MB Local Memory
217.6 GFLOPS
25.6 GB/s Memory
360:
IBM Xenon
3.2GHz
Three Cores
1MB Shared L2
115.2 GFLOPS
21.6 GB/s Interface
Wi:
IBM Broadway
729MHz
256KB L2
2.9 GFLOPS
1.9 GB/s Bus
Winner: PS3
Graphics:
PS3:
NVIDIA RSX
500MHz
24 Pixel Pipelines
8 Vertex Pipelines
250M Polygons/Sec
12G Texels/Sec
8G Samples/Sec
20.8 GB/s Memory
360:
ATI Xenos
500MHz
48 Unified Pipelines
500M Polygons/Sec
8G Texels/Sec
16G Samples/Sec
10MB Buffer (256 GB/s)
22.4 GB/s Memory
Wii:
ATI Hollywood
243MHz
975M Texels/Sec
3MB Buffer (27.3 GB/s)
7.9 GB/s Memory
Winner: Surprisingly, the 360.
Memory:
PS3:
256MB (25.6 GB/s)
256MB (20.8 GB/s)
20-320GB HDD
2x Blu-ray (72Mbps)
360:
512MB (22.4 GB/s)
20-250GB HDD
12x DVD (133Mbps)
Wii:
24MB (3.9 GB/s)
64MB (4 GB/s)
512MB Flash
8.5GB Optical Discs
Winner: PS3.
Overall, when dealing with just the hardware, the PS3 is the superior system.
And while the 360 may have better hardware than the Wii, the Wii has far better software support for it's hardware, something that the 360 cannot say.
You really do like to be right. Sadly, opinion is still not fact. My opinion, I like the 360. I like the Wii too, though I don't have one. Also, in my opinion, I do not like the PS3. But I will admit it has some good looking games and utility.
You can not change my opinion of the 360.
You can not change my opinion of the 360.
Barely inferior? The PS3 doubles as a Blue-Ray DVD player, to watch Hi-Def movies, something that the 360 cannot ever do. That's a BIG inferiority right there. 360's IBM Xenon cannot even hold a CANDLE to the PS3's Cell. 8 cores are definitely better than 3. the PS3 can perform almost DOUBLE the Floating Operations Per Second compared to the 360. That's not "barely inferior." That's some major computing power difference that the 360 lacks.
You have a rarity: a 360 that doesn't give you the Red Ring of Death. Most 360's have problems built into the hardware that render it an inferior product.
Macro$haft cares nothing about the consumer. They just want your money. Hell the company was founded on lying and stealing.
The PS3 does not charge their customers access to their network, yet you NEED a subscription for X-box Live.
If you want party games, get a Wii. If you want great HD gaming, get a PS3.
What's the point of having a 360 when the games run better on the PS3? There is NO exclusive games that make up for the shortcomings of the system.
The PS3 is the superior product, and the Wii is much more accepted then the 360.
You have a rarity: a 360 that doesn't give you the Red Ring of Death. Most 360's have problems built into the hardware that render it an inferior product.
Macro$haft cares nothing about the consumer. They just want your money. Hell the company was founded on lying and stealing.
The PS3 does not charge their customers access to their network, yet you NEED a subscription for X-box Live.
If you want party games, get a Wii. If you want great HD gaming, get a PS3.
What's the point of having a 360 when the games run better on the PS3? There is NO exclusive games that make up for the shortcomings of the system.
The PS3 is the superior product, and the Wii is much more accepted then the 360.
Part of the reason for having a 360 was the PS3 came out later. Plus for a LONG time the running gag was the PS3 had no games, that went on for what, a good year, year and a half after its release, at least? Its only use was a cheap blu-ray player.
Also laughable is the argument MS only wants your money. Trust me, Sony is the exact same way. Also, no, you don't NEED a subscription. You can do a lot without it until it comes to most online play. I say most, as FFXI which I tend to play often doesn't require the gold.
Also laughable is the argument MS only wants your money. Trust me, Sony is the exact same way. Also, no, you don't NEED a subscription. You can do a lot without it until it comes to most online play. I say most, as FFXI which I tend to play often doesn't require the gold.
Not opinion, fact. in fact, here's two more for you:
- The PS3 has more user friendly aspects as compared to Xbox 360. You have a PS3; you can get along by attaching its Hard disk to your laptop or any other compatible device. But if you have an Xbox 360, then you are just bound to it for al; eternity.
- The PS3 generates higher degree of visuals through the HDMI cable and the 1.3a specs, whereas Xbox 360 is sitting low through the 1.2 specs.
- The PS3 has more user friendly aspects as compared to Xbox 360. You have a PS3; you can get along by attaching its Hard disk to your laptop or any other compatible device. But if you have an Xbox 360, then you are just bound to it for al; eternity.
- The PS3 generates higher degree of visuals through the HDMI cable and the 1.3a specs, whereas Xbox 360 is sitting low through the 1.2 specs.
No, I've hated EVERY SINGLE WINDOWS OPERATING SYSTEM.
Every time they release a new version they claim to have fixed the problems with the old version, just to give me new problems that make my sorfware not work right/at all.
But I keep getting stuck with it.
Macro$haft loves sticking it to their costumers. And the 360 is no different. Want some free content for your game?
CANNOT HAVE IT, BECAUSE MACRO$HAFT WON'T LET YOU HAVE ANY UPDATES THAT HAVE NEW ACHIEVEMENTS WITHOUT PAYING FIRST.
That's right. If Macro$haft didn't only care about your money, then they would allow free downloads of stuff like on the PS3. But because new content that is free on the PS3 may have some new achievements on it 360 USERS MUST PAY FOR THE CONTENT.
So try telling me again that Macro$haft actually cares about their costumers, rather than their money.
Every time they release a new version they claim to have fixed the problems with the old version, just to give me new problems that make my sorfware not work right/at all.
But I keep getting stuck with it.
Macro$haft loves sticking it to their costumers. And the 360 is no different. Want some free content for your game?
CANNOT HAVE IT, BECAUSE MACRO$HAFT WON'T LET YOU HAVE ANY UPDATES THAT HAVE NEW ACHIEVEMENTS WITHOUT PAYING FIRST.
That's right. If Macro$haft didn't only care about your money, then they would allow free downloads of stuff like on the PS3. But because new content that is free on the PS3 may have some new achievements on it 360 USERS MUST PAY FOR THE CONTENT.
So try telling me again that Macro$haft actually cares about their costumers, rather than their money.
not to cut in, but realisticly, most operating systems suck. Macs are for retards that have no sense of individuality. Windows is for people that want everything customized and personalized, but the cost of that is countless glitches and a requirement for constant upgrades and software repairs. Linux is for people that want to do nothing but make viruses, and that's it. Realisticaly, there's no decent OS out there (that I know of). All that have a great advantage end up with a flaw that makes you want to pound your face into the keyboard. And about the consoles, I can't say that I prefer any one over the other. They both have flaws and awes just like the operating systems. I don't own all of them, but each of them owns their own small selection of half-way decent games and then oceans of shit games.
examples of ps3 greats, InFamous, Uncharted 1 and 2, Resistance 1 and 2, Ratchet and Clank Future series, killzone, LBP, and not to mention that 3d games. also playstation online play is free. also i enjoy the wii. I have house of the dead 2 and 3 and i love arcade shooters like those. personally, i think microsoft just wanted to earn a quick buck by releasing the 360 early and its going to only end in disaster.
Cant wait for InFamous 2 just saying
Cant wait for InFamous 2 just saying
also playstation online play is free.
I can't believe I forgot that little caveat. PSN is indeed free. Why should I have to pay MORE money to play online content I already paid for by buying the game?
Especially seeing as if you pay for new games, they run $60.
...
Although, I'm surprised that someone commented on my little rant after so long, on a compromised/banned account.
I can't believe I forgot that little caveat. PSN is indeed free. Why should I have to pay MORE money to play online content I already paid for by buying the game?
Especially seeing as if you pay for new games, they run $60.
...
Although, I'm surprised that someone commented on my little rant after so long, on a compromised/banned account.
and of course i write the reply before i read the comments, so many of my topics are spoken of. my bad. just adding the god of war series and metal gear to the exclusive list. tear down the microsoft tyranny. strike back. send them a message and buy a ps3, or even wait for the next great system from sony.
speaking of which they STILL make NEW GAMES for the PS2! thats how great sony is at creating systems that they have an old system still functioning to this day. my question is whatever happened to those old xboxes. yeah thats right. dead.
speaking of which they STILL make NEW GAMES for the PS2! thats how great sony is at creating systems that they have an old system still functioning to this day. my question is whatever happened to those old xboxes. yeah thats right. dead.
Which is why it's PS3>Wii>360
But there was very little support for the eye-toy, and it didn't quite work too well. The Wii took the idea, and solidified it with the Wiimote. Then Move came about, which essentially is a better, and more functional version of the Wiimote, and it looks pretty promising.
Kinnect can still kiss my ass. It's a step backwards, per the usual when it comes to Macro$haft.
But there was very little support for the eye-toy, and it didn't quite work too well. The Wii took the idea, and solidified it with the Wiimote. Then Move came about, which essentially is a better, and more functional version of the Wiimote, and it looks pretty promising.
Kinnect can still kiss my ass. It's a step backwards, per the usual when it comes to Macro$haft.
Sorry for not reading comments till now, but the red ring of death was killed with the slim lol, and who wears black to play kinnect, when I play Wii I'm in pajamas or work clothes most the time lol. Personally I got a Wii its ..ok... but the other systems look a lot more appealing, of course I got an Xbox 360 slim for the Fable series(waited a long time to find out Fable 2 was not coming out for PC), not to dance in a game. I can dance like a fool in real life just fine. You kind of sound like one of the annoying people I met at the apple store when I had to help my friend find an adapter, your facts were there, just out of date, and horribly biased.
Also I'm not sure what the overall sales are at now, but what I saw back when I cared was Wii only out sold the other 2 systems its opening 2 years, all the sites compared its first years versus the 360 and PS3 first years. Which is easily explained with the fact its cheaper, that's why I got one over a 360 as my first new age console, and it was unique. Wii has kind of gotten stale, last game I bought and enjoyed was Ghost-busters, and I actually own games for PS3 and I don't even own one lol.
Wii is in last place in my book, only plus it has left is a cheaper price tag and the hope that one day it will have a new Zelda that's worth playing.
PS3=360(due mostly to fable)>PC>Dreamcast>N64=Wii(got to say I do love N64)
PS my Dreamcast in my opinion has better graphics then my Wii, it has no motion sensor, but it was great for its short life.
Also I'm not sure what the overall sales are at now, but what I saw back when I cared was Wii only out sold the other 2 systems its opening 2 years, all the sites compared its first years versus the 360 and PS3 first years. Which is easily explained with the fact its cheaper, that's why I got one over a 360 as my first new age console, and it was unique. Wii has kind of gotten stale, last game I bought and enjoyed was Ghost-busters, and I actually own games for PS3 and I don't even own one lol.
Wii is in last place in my book, only plus it has left is a cheaper price tag and the hope that one day it will have a new Zelda that's worth playing.
PS3=360(due mostly to fable)>PC>Dreamcast>N64=Wii(got to say I do love N64)
PS my Dreamcast in my opinion has better graphics then my Wii, it has no motion sensor, but it was great for its short life.
I am not biased in any way. Macro$haft has proven time and time again that their products are inferior.
All the system specs I provided are not out of date in the least bit. Those are the current system specs, and PS3 outshines the 360 in terms of pure system specs.
The slim still suffers from RRoD.
Dancing games suck balls, and Fable 2 was just as big of a letdown as fable 1.
Wii's sales are still strong, and last I heard it still was on top for sales. Hell both PS3 and Wii have sold more units than the 360 last time I saw the figures.
All the system specs I provided are not out of date in the least bit. Those are the current system specs, and PS3 outshines the 360 in terms of pure system specs.
The slim still suffers from RRoD.
Dancing games suck balls, and Fable 2 was just as big of a letdown as fable 1.
Wii's sales are still strong, and last I heard it still was on top for sales. Hell both PS3 and Wii have sold more units than the 360 last time I saw the figures.
the only reason that the wii has sold more is because it is more family friendly and is cheaper because of its "OLD TECH" now i will admit that the ps3 is nice for many reasons ex.(its blue ray, free wi fi...) now the 360 is bad for the glitches but it has the best online play games and online. now how i see it as now the rank of the console but preference, if you want blue ray and free wi fi then go with the ps3, if your buying for a family then the wii all the way, and for online play the the games 360. i don't think that any console is better just preference.
as an added note i think you own a ps3 and are very bio-us.
as an added note i think you own a ps3 and are very bio-us.
Wow... Talk about getting to the party over 7 months late....
I feel sorry for you. I really do. You feel the need to justify the 360 so bad that you replied to comments made in a journal IN NOVEMBER OF LAST YEAR.
I own a PS3 and a Wii, and have used a friend's 360. The 360 sucks. End of discussion.
I feel sorry for you. I really do. You feel the need to justify the 360 so bad that you replied to comments made in a journal IN NOVEMBER OF LAST YEAR.
I own a PS3 and a Wii, and have used a friend's 360. The 360 sucks. End of discussion.
I'm hoping maybe an "extra" for donations or an in-game easter egg will include printable box art you can add to a blank box.
One devilish end-run around copyright issues could work thus: Sell blank boxes with a blank writable CD-ROM and label inside, for a ludicrously overpriced price which just so happens to be about what you'd pay commercially for the game. Then, in the shipping confirmation for the completely generic items, include a download link for printable artwork for the box and CD label. The URL would have no restrictions on who can access it; it's technically public and will no doubt be pirated within minutes, but the only people who have a USE for it would be people who'd bought the blank box.
All completely optional--you could just get yourself a blank box and CD-ROM at normal prices and use those... but by buying the overpriced version from Aval0nX, you'd effectively be making a donation in the amount of the difference between the inflated price and what you'd pay elsewhere for the blank box.
Nothing being actually sold would involve copyrighted content at all, since it'd just be the blank stuff, with all copyrighted characters being only in free content. And yet at the end of the day the creators of the game would have more money and the players who chose to donate so would have a physical copy.
I'm not a copyright lawyer though, so this may not actually work. O_o
One devilish end-run around copyright issues could work thus: Sell blank boxes with a blank writable CD-ROM and label inside, for a ludicrously overpriced price which just so happens to be about what you'd pay commercially for the game. Then, in the shipping confirmation for the completely generic items, include a download link for printable artwork for the box and CD label. The URL would have no restrictions on who can access it; it's technically public and will no doubt be pirated within minutes, but the only people who have a USE for it would be people who'd bought the blank box.
All completely optional--you could just get yourself a blank box and CD-ROM at normal prices and use those... but by buying the overpriced version from Aval0nX, you'd effectively be making a donation in the amount of the difference between the inflated price and what you'd pay elsewhere for the blank box.
Nothing being actually sold would involve copyrighted content at all, since it'd just be the blank stuff, with all copyrighted characters being only in free content. And yet at the end of the day the creators of the game would have more money and the players who chose to donate so would have a physical copy.
I'm not a copyright lawyer though, so this may not actually work. O_o
Oh this is great, your beating the big companies at their own game. As someone said before, the blank stuff is the taxed items where teh costs actually occur. So anyone who buys the blanks from you, isnt buying the blanks frome someone that you are Not getting money from. Then inside each case you have a PGP key. for that case. Downloads occur with teh combination of the Persons PGP key, The Case PGP key, and Your PGP key.. meaning ever item is unique, but totally seperated from any hardware or software (runtime) requirements? Just need to solve the end of days problem, where tehres no more registration.. but maybe a Library of Congress stored master PGP key would handle that?
Oh dear, Im rambling more than Sally on a bender in a stud farm. 8}
All Hail. Cos I cant afford the servicing 8)
Oh dear, Im rambling more than Sally on a bender in a stud farm. 8}
All Hail. Cos I cant afford the servicing 8)
You know though, You could really try and make it look more professional, for the lulz. Add the player/game details on the lower bottom and the disclaimer in fine print on the bottom, have that TIGRS rating (I liked it,) and some lines that will motivate me to buy the product right next to where vanilla is.
Geeze those guys where completely off topic.
Never mind them - I've sen this game on the net somewhere before and its really cute.
Should really have a character selection, i'd flick bean big time if i could fuck Creamy with Sally or even Nicole (drooole). Oh the thought makes me sooo. Damn freakin hot.
Never mind them - I've sen this game on the net somewhere before and its really cute.
Should really have a character selection, i'd flick bean big time if i could fuck Creamy with Sally or even Nicole (drooole). Oh the thought makes me sooo. Damn freakin hot.
FA+

Comments