FA+
Shop
843
Views
Views
37
Favorites
Favorites
Category
Designs / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1209 x 758
File Size 82.7 kB
Report this content
★
More from sanny
A consept of a sportscar... its bit rough and verry flawed but hjstu soem i tossed togetehr for jstu fun and se my colour skills
Category Designs / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1209 x 758px
File Size 82.7 kB
Mean that movie with michael jackson? that car in that move is belive me or not a japanes car, named DOME Zero made in 1978
(was back tracking for i back of the head thot it was the Vector but saw it wasint and by mistace se the dome in GT4 now as i copared the cars fomr a movie shot)
(was back tracking for i back of the head thot it was the Vector but saw it wasint and by mistace se the dome in GT4 now as i copared the cars fomr a movie shot)
MMmmh, lessee, I cannot name them all, but I see Lamborghini for the most, maybe the newest firebird for the tringular shape, maybe BMW sportscar for the air intake at the front ; also the lights and the serie of shark-like gills before the windshield reminds me of some recent prototypes (maybe a Renault for the gills) - not THAT recent anyway, something like half-a-dozen years...
But the half rear definitely reminds me of some recent Lamborghini, glasses, intakes, spoilers, etc.
But the half rear definitely reminds me of some recent Lamborghini, glasses, intakes, spoilers, etc.
Well, I've been using AutoCAD for over ten years and have only recently been introduced to parametric CAD software such as CATIA or Pro-E, and I have to say that parametric modeling is more scientific and adaptable.
In parametric CAD, you define solid models by constraints, or rules. An adequate would be neither under-constrained over over-constrained. Take a triangle for instance. Any triangle can be defined by three sides or angle. Anymore information than that would be too much, and any less would render it impossible to define the triangle.
Parametric CAD would be the more scientific way to define objects like your car design.
In parametric CAD, you define solid models by constraints, or rules. An adequate would be neither under-constrained over over-constrained. Take a triangle for instance. Any triangle can be defined by three sides or angle. Anymore information than that would be too much, and any less would render it impossible to define the triangle.
Parametric CAD would be the more scientific way to define objects like your car design.
Comments