The natural philosopher always gets to the bottom of the mysteries that the world throw at them. And when the mystery is a monstrous head and nothing more, the natural philosopher will study, research and finally question the thing using dark rituals and black magic. What better way to confirm their hypotesis than to ask directly to the creature in question ?

Recently I saw Steve Zapata's video where he talks about AI generated art and, in particular, how (badly) the art community is handling the situation. ( If you are curious, you can check it out here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tjSxFAGP9Ss&t=5s ).
I do agree with him on a number of points, especially on the way training databases are collected and used. Although it shouldn't be something that has to be declared but should be obvious, I'm here gonna state the following:
I do not consent to the use of this image (or any other image I've done) as part of a training database without prior agreement. Thank you.

Posted using PostyBirb