
This is an Ask I did recently for a high tier supporter (still going through old ones).
I can't wait to see how many opinions this generates.
patreon.com/jaynaylor
subscribestar.adult/jaynaylor
I can't wait to see how many opinions this generates.
patreon.com/jaynaylor
subscribestar.adult/jaynaylor
Category All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1588 x 2321px
File Size 491 kB
My only knowledge on this comes from Tarkov, so all I know is 7.62x39 is better because you can buy PS GZH rounds at LL1 Prapor which can pen class 4 armor. This will carry you til endgame, where you can upgrade to BP GZH to handle even class 6 armor without much difficulty. 5.56x45 guns have pretty good handling compared to 7.62x39, usually. But the guns are pricier, and you don't unlock decent ammo for it until at least Peacekeeper LL2 when you complete The Cult - Part 1, allowing you to buy M856A1 rounds.
Cute panties, btw.
Cute panties, btw.
I think, in Tarkov's case, 7.62x39 are actually more plentiful than 5.56x45 being a game set in a more Russian/Slavic setting where 7.62x39 is more or less the main ammo used. So 5.56 is actually the rarer ammo in comparison, as most of the guns you will find in the area are chambered in 7.62 and the 5.56 guns are rarer, as is the ammo in comparison.
That is why 7.62 is better for penetration, being a heavier round, and larger, which is inherently why it has the drawbacks listed. Heavier, less variety, in places like North America there are heavy restrictions on the ammo and other issues.
That is why 7.62 is better for penetration, being a heavier round, and larger, which is inherently why it has the drawbacks listed. Heavier, less variety, in places like North America there are heavy restrictions on the ammo and other issues.
The rest of the unlock process matches up with this, too. Your first set of traders give you civilian market rifles and Soviet Era relics. You get access to both more modern Russian weapons and a larger variety of NATO with higher level.
Makes sense given the lore that guns are hard to smuggle in so most of what you'll see is what a Russian farmer or sport shooter might have access to.
Makes sense given the lore that guns are hard to smuggle in so most of what you'll see is what a Russian farmer or sport shooter might have access to.
Yeah, never played Tarkov myself, wanted to but the friend that was going to buy it to play with bailed on me, but from what I have seen, it seems that way, that you start from the bottom with easily replaced or mass-produced stuff, since if you die and lose it, there is no big deal, before you get to have more and more exclusive and good things after you have proven yourself.
But the few things it gains are the exact things that potentially save your life (or rather, end the other guys' life before he can end yours).
Accessories and availability are all nice and good until you're cowering behind a small rock wishing you had had the option of bringing just a bit more power to this fight.
Accessories and availability are all nice and good until you're cowering behind a small rock wishing you had had the option of bringing just a bit more power to this fight.
I love my .357s lol I use them in my carbines and my pistols. I have a large variety of loads and bullets for them I put together as well. It gains A LOT when fired through a longer barrel with ballistics similar to a 7.62x39. I find 5.56s to be awful for game hunting though, might as well be using a .22 magnum, Unless I am going for like rabbits or somethin.
I'm less of a rifle lover and more of a pistol lover. Don't get me wrong, I love the P-90 design, but I see it as more of an SMG than a service rifle. The AR-15 is just a sportier M16A2 which I used in the military, while the AK-47 (while looking scary) used the same ammo as the M240 Golf I fired in training.
As far as lightweight, but with good penetration is concerned, I prefer the .475 Wildey Magnum ammo if you're looking to take down a rhino in less than 4 shots, and a .357 Magnum just for your average bad guys.
As far as lightweight, but with good penetration is concerned, I prefer the .475 Wildey Magnum ammo if you're looking to take down a rhino in less than 4 shots, and a .357 Magnum just for your average bad guys.
I'm better at talking pro and con A4 vs Legal US, so A4 is metric, cut in half you get A5, take 2 you get A3, 2 A3 give you A2, same to get A1 and two A1 for A0 witch is one square meter. And width divide by height give you square root of 2. Pure math so lovely
Legal us is just a nonsense !
Legal us is just a nonsense !
I mean, she's right. Though, out to about 300yds, the ballistics of the 7.62x39 are on par with the 5.56. Its after that where it starts to deviate a lot more, at least from my experience. Granted, I'm not the best shooter.
Let's adjust the question to which caliber is her preferred?
Let's adjust the question to which caliber is her preferred?
I do disagree with the higher recoil. I mean, it really depends on the rifle set up, but I've found that with a lot of firearms, it's not really softer, harder, lighter, or whatever, but just different. A .45 ACP doesn't kick the same way a 9mm does, etc., but that's my experience. Very on-point with the diversity of the 5.56 cartridge though.
I like your take on Red's answer overall. Not better or worse, but with tradeoffs. I'd love to fire an AK chambered in 5.56 and/or 5.45. I think the platform would be an interesting switch! I am amazed at what they've done with 5.56 (and 9mm) though. It's not a simple cut-and-dry "Which is better?" anymore, but rather what specific ammo you're using.
She's not wrong. Having had worked at Colt Firearms back in the late 1970s, It took me years to accept the 5.56 as an effective battle weapon. This was especially true, having worked with a number of highly opinionated Vietnam veterans who hated the M16. It took me years to cast off the influences of others.
My personal experience with 7.62 x 39 comes from two Rugers: a Mini 30 (semi-auto) and an M77. They are both surprisingly accurate. I first fired an M16A1 in 1979 and I realized a bunch of opinionated veterans weren't necessarily the best resource and that a full-auto carbine was easily handled (and out of my reach, financially). So, I own a AR15 type. The round is fast, light and if well-placed, effective.
What would I carry if I was still in the 'Have Gun, Will Travel' business? The answer to that, as Red indicates, requires the consideration of the assignment and the tradeoffs.
My personal experience with 7.62 x 39 comes from two Rugers: a Mini 30 (semi-auto) and an M77. They are both surprisingly accurate. I first fired an M16A1 in 1979 and I realized a bunch of opinionated veterans weren't necessarily the best resource and that a full-auto carbine was easily handled (and out of my reach, financially). So, I own a AR15 type. The round is fast, light and if well-placed, effective.
What would I carry if I was still in the 'Have Gun, Will Travel' business? The answer to that, as Red indicates, requires the consideration of the assignment and the tradeoffs.
Comments