So, my biggest fear came true. Starting on the 27th of May I'll have to start deleting each and every single Pokemon/Digimon pieces from my gallery that could violate the new rule, which is probably 80% of what I've posted so far. This is a huge blow to me as drawing has been my sole form of income since 2016, thanks to all my amazing clients and friends, and each and every piece really matters to me.
First and foremost, I WILL NOT STOP DRAWING THEM. I simply won't post anything that could potentially warrant me a ban on this site anymore. All other pics that don't fall under the policy will still be posted here.
So, what changes for me and you guys?
-You'll still be able to order whatever you want from me, I'll just not post it here if it falls under the new policy
-All pics will be sent directly to you via Google Drive as I've always done
-The "forbidden" pics be posted on my side either to my e621 gallery or my Inkbunny, maybe both. I'm still calculating my options. My username will be the same in any case, still Revous.
I beg you all to bear with me during these changes. This will not affect in any way the quality of my work or the themes I work with, I'm still 100% up to working with whatever makes y'all happy. I don't judge and never did.
In case my account here is banned, even after the purge, please reach out to me via Inkbunny or email at revous.feedback[at]gmail.com
>Please save any pics you like as I'm unsure when I'll be able to upload them all again to my other accounts<
>ALL my pics are backed up so if you ever commissioned me and your pic got purged, you can request it directly with me, or using the google drive link I gave you. These are never ever deleted on my end<
♦♦♦ Here's my Inkbunny, I'm currently getting it up to date!
First and foremost, I WILL NOT STOP DRAWING THEM. I simply won't post anything that could potentially warrant me a ban on this site anymore. All other pics that don't fall under the policy will still be posted here.
So, what changes for me and you guys?
-You'll still be able to order whatever you want from me, I'll just not post it here if it falls under the new policy
-All pics will be sent directly to you via Google Drive as I've always done
-The "forbidden" pics be posted on my side either to my e621 gallery or my Inkbunny, maybe both. I'm still calculating my options. My username will be the same in any case, still Revous.
I beg you all to bear with me during these changes. This will not affect in any way the quality of my work or the themes I work with, I'm still 100% up to working with whatever makes y'all happy. I don't judge and never did.
In case my account here is banned, even after the purge, please reach out to me via Inkbunny or email at revous.feedback[at]gmail.com
>Please save any pics you like as I'm unsure when I'll be able to upload them all again to my other accounts<
>ALL my pics are backed up so if you ever commissioned me and your pic got purged, you can request it directly with me, or using the google drive link I gave you. These are never ever deleted on my end<
♦♦♦ Here's my Inkbunny, I'm currently getting it up to date!
Category All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 512 x 652px
File Size 180.1 kB
These are the kind of anthro artists supporting this ban, not really for what the characters look like, but more so because they personally hate adult pokemon, digimon, and cute cartoony stuff, and this is a convenient excuse to get a huge chunk of it banned. Bonus if the artists leave, less posts of pokemon and digimon.
Yeah honestly that feels like where a lot of the folks in 100% support of this (who, frankly, seem few and far between so I'm amazed it happened in the first place) are coming from. A place of just pure hatred for what they personally don't like, with no actual logical arguments to back up that feeling.
A lot of them just straight up don't like Pokemon/Digimon art to BEGIN with, but will take a ban of feral ones when really they'd like a ban of all of them. It's sickening, and sad how many artists, some of whom I've grown up being inspired by, this short-sighted rule tweak will affect.
This was never a quote-on-quote "loophole" as they put it, it's just people who don't personally like something that's entirely legal and in no way involves underage, forcing their personal opinions onto an entire userbase (and apparently banning anyone who so much as asks questions about it from the FA discord, or so I've heard.)
A lot of them just straight up don't like Pokemon/Digimon art to BEGIN with, but will take a ban of feral ones when really they'd like a ban of all of them. It's sickening, and sad how many artists, some of whom I've grown up being inspired by, this short-sighted rule tweak will affect.
This was never a quote-on-quote "loophole" as they put it, it's just people who don't personally like something that's entirely legal and in no way involves underage, forcing their personal opinions onto an entire userbase (and apparently banning anyone who so much as asks questions about it from the FA discord, or so I've heard.)
Considering she's got developed breasts and hips it'd be very, very unlikely that she gets ruled as a child. The new rule enforcement is more for chibi pokemon like all egg evolutions (pichu, magby, etc) or similar chibi pokemon and digimon, not things like renamon.
If it fits the chibi style of big head with big eyes and stubby limbs it's probably going to get axed.
If it fits the chibi style of big head with big eyes and stubby limbs it's probably going to get axed.
They will be banning pretty much any depiction of 1st evo Pokemon, or small Pokemon, regardless of actual age of the character. Even my own fursona could fall under the ban and I'm a regular Poochyena. It has nothing to do with child porn. I've reached out to other artists who have checked with mods for specific violations and even Pokemon such as Pikachu were considered "bannable" depending on the style of the artist. I draw "on model" (following the official art) or "kemono/chibi" (cutesy, simplified anatomy), so yeah, there goes most of my gallery. Thanks for asking, let me know if you have any other questions and I'll be glad to answer! çwç
This is the only pic I worry about now https://www.furaffinity.net/view/37635324/
Its more like it must be aged up, which is arguably hard to do with some normal non-anthro pokemon and a few anthro pokemon. It probably depends on the artist's style too.
They will be looking at anatomy and proportions alongside the context of the submission when determining if the submission would be found in violation or not.
They will be looking at anatomy and proportions alongside the context of the submission when determining if the submission would be found in violation or not.
This update is causing a lot of unintended (I hope) collateral damage. I really do apologize for it also happening to you.
Already went through and purged some of mine as well, least the obviously hit stuff. But I know I'll probably remove even more on my end.
Regardless, yeah this policy is ridiculous. Like...you can't have characters that are proportioned accurately to the source material or anything huh? Get ready to remove almost all nsfw starter pokémon and rookie digimon that aren't either super anthro or made to look really off-model I guess...
Already went through and purged some of mine as well, least the obviously hit stuff. But I know I'll probably remove even more on my end.
Regardless, yeah this policy is ridiculous. Like...you can't have characters that are proportioned accurately to the source material or anything huh? Get ready to remove almost all nsfw starter pokémon and rookie digimon that aren't either super anthro or made to look really off-model I guess...
Yeah, it just makes absolutely no sense to me to ban on-model characters or small anthros. I'm a small person myself, so if I were to draw my anthro sona he'd still be a small anthro Poochyena, like wth??
Anyways, thank you so much for the kind words, they really mean a lot ♥
Anyways, thank you so much for the kind words, they really mean a lot ♥
Try to lighten it by joking about bara anthro mons haha. Guess those are what FA wants.
I actually worry a bit about Yori as well, as you said, small anthro characters also could potentially get hit. Will see in time.
But yeah~ haha. Been a good bit...I really need to commission you again. I miss getting them from you.
I actually worry a bit about Yori as well, as you said, small anthro characters also could potentially get hit. Will see in time.
But yeah~ haha. Been a good bit...I really need to commission you again. I miss getting them from you.
Sadly I think so too. I love this place, I built my entire gallery, connections, friends, LIFE here. I don't wanna leave it. I won't leave it. But seeing 80% of my gallery just go poof is gonna be sad as hell. (and then there's also the logistic nightmare of deleting it all and reuploading)
A very famous artist with a style similar to mine (in terms of proportions) asked the staff and gave examples, and they said it was bannable due to proportions, not species itself. So we can draw an anthro bara pikachu but not an on-model pikachu.
I submitted a ticket with like, a hundred pics from my gallery asking what they think about it.
I submitted a ticket with like, a hundred pics from my gallery asking what they think about it.
Ugh... I mean, I get why they're doing it, but I don't see how it would solve the issue in the slightest when there are plenty of alternative websites that serve the same purpose... I get that child porn is a serious issue and all, no question there... but hell, it causes more damage than it does good, IF it does ANY. This really sucks for artists of many fandoms...
Yeah, I mean... I'm all for banning child-like characters, but Pokemon cannonically don't have to evolve in order to age. And as per Argon Vile's ticket, Yoshi, Pikachu, etc all fall into the "childlike" policy due to proportions. It's hoenstly fucked up all around. I'm in shambles, FA is like my second home AND my job. I have so many friends here and I made a career here, I'm a full time artist. I really hope I'll be able to keep doing what a love in a more welcoming environment.
>I'm all for banning child-like characters
That's a slippery-ass slope already, because by their vague, lazy definition of what constitutes a child, many genuinely adult characters are forbidden too. Wave the Swallow, Midna, Tristana, Shantotto, Tatsumaki, Judy Hopps, Animal Crossing or Aggretsuko characters drawn accurate to the the series' artstyles, tons of characters who no longer qualify as adults by FA's warped standards because they aren't tall, busty supermodels with realistic human proportions.
That's a slippery-ass slope already, because by their vague, lazy definition of what constitutes a child, many genuinely adult characters are forbidden too. Wave the Swallow, Midna, Tristana, Shantotto, Tatsumaki, Judy Hopps, Animal Crossing or Aggretsuko characters drawn accurate to the the series' artstyles, tons of characters who no longer qualify as adults by FA's warped standards because they aren't tall, busty supermodels with realistic human proportions.
Sorry, let me clarify, I'm for banning sexualized infantilized characters (i was thinking of humanized anthros mostly, sorta like loli/shota). I personally don't have a problem with them (art is art and idgaf), but I understand it poses a risk to the site itself as demonetization from payment platforms is a real thing. But they went and shot their feet off on their own so this isn't even a problem to discuss anymore hahah
I don't plan on getting banned as I'll purge my gallery of anything that violates the new policy! I'll just move my main activity to Inkbunny, but you'll still be able to reach me here or via email ^^ I'm also considering making a twitter or Discord to help balance out the two, too, so we can still be in touch! ♥
Thanks, added my link to all mentions of Inkbunny on my profile and here! ♦Inkbunny♦
Yeah man, this is pretty insane. Your style is definitely cute and cuddly but not in any way cub art... I'll be following you on IB and possibly just abandoning this dumpster fire of a site. If the admins can't keep dicks off the SFW front page they sure as hell can't tell someone trying to circumvent their cub policies.
Any NSFW art they deem "too childlike" has to be removed, sadly (even if the character is overage), and the worst part is that welll... what one mod considers bannable doesn't have to align with the others, so were at risk depending who reviews it. My sona is a Poochyena who never evolved, he's an adult but still bannable by their standards due to proportions (he's smaller than average for his species, just like I am irl).
i understand, (love your sona btw) , whats a bit worse is i do have a few sonas haven't uploaded that do have the pikachu complex (you know like Ash's pikachu where they refuse to evolve) 3 have gained everstones , and the rest of the 13 just refuse to and cancel the glow when it happens.
this whole thing where we have to "age up" considering i have no art ability... what i am hearing is if you want any nsfw material of the character your gonna have to change their design, or get a new ref sheet to make the changes easier to show to artists
🤦♂️ to have to reinvest money on ref sheets just seems tedious and unnecessary.
wouldn't even know how to begin to age up my Yena Poochyena form
this whole thing where we have to "age up" considering i have no art ability... what i am hearing is if you want any nsfw material of the character your gonna have to change their design, or get a new ref sheet to make the changes easier to show to artists
🤦♂️ to have to reinvest money on ref sheets just seems tedious and unnecessary.
wouldn't even know how to begin to age up my Yena Poochyena form
Yeah I honestly didn't even consider the possibility of editing pics, it's impossible on my end as I've been working since 2016.. So all I've got left to do is take my 'yeen and his pals somewhere they'll be accepted, like Inkbunny. I'll keep this FA for bigger chars only.
....so "cuties style" equals minor/cub or confusion over it?
sign at this point... ot looks like there's 3 options
1. post only evolved forms and refs here, post art of my base evolution Sona and Ocs on Ib
or
2. Just move over to IB to avoid the problem (to have to "age up" or submit a ticket to get approval is going to be time consuming
or lastly
3. just purge my Gallery any art i comissioned leaving only refs and Upload to E621.
sign at this point... ot looks like there's 3 options
1. post only evolved forms and refs here, post art of my base evolution Sona and Ocs on Ib
or
2. Just move over to IB to avoid the problem (to have to "age up" or submit a ticket to get approval is going to be time consuming
or lastly
3. just purge my Gallery any art i comissioned leaving only refs and Upload to E621.
Yeah, they're considering smaller Pokemon and Digimon as cubs (even though it doesn't make any sense, Eevee for example can breed ingame, etc). It's up to you how to proceed but on my end I'll just delete everything that doesn't fit. I'll leave my FA up and running for a while to see if everyone will move. I sadly cannot afford to lose clients over a site change, so I'll keep both FA and IB for the time being.
Really hope you and others wait on this as you have until July 1st, and the backlash is increasing every day as more people find out and more realise it doesn't just hit pokemon and digimon. Hope you read my comment below, too. It's long, yeah, but it would suck to you and your fans if you did this and FA ended up pulling out, like they did on banning feral, losing years of pics, comments, etc. Already lost almost 2 decades of great posts from many others, while many more are fighting back.
Hi. I don't normally talk on here, but why purge this soon, the rule doesn't go into effect until July 1. Can you give it time to see what happens? There's massive pushback and it may be rescinded like when they attempted banning feral art long ago because "beastiality".
I think you shouldn't just give up so quick. You're far from alone, I've been reading journals of artists all over. There are tens of thousands of artists and their fans, millions of images since 2006 that would be hit by this subjective BS policy change. You should all talk to eachother and band together and resist. They are essentially implying that drawing fictional cute style chibi/small/kobold/imp body type animal or other fictional characters in adult situations is child porn and causes real life pedos to go hurt real life children, and that you are one of them if you draw or like them, it's extremely insulting.
Giving up and letting them win won't be the end of it, either, and would only affirm to FA and these mostly anthro artists pushing this change that drawing cute style cartoon animals etc. in adult situations == CP. And forcing you to post your stuff alongside actual cub art would just validate them.
My apologies for this rant, but their reasoning is as BS as "video games cause violence," or stating that posting gore, blood, vore, death and other violent stuff causes people to go out and beat or kill people or animals in real life, and the artists are just like them. Their "protecting minors" excuse falls apart the moment you realise they allow 13 year olds on FA, and are OK with posting a pregnant human 13 year old girl transformed into an eevee getting vored.
If they applied this subjective standard to everything, then all cute femboy teenage body type anthro art would be subjectively underage because you decided they look like they are. All pony characters would be by description "ponies", adolescent kid horses, and you could equally decide any character of any species in less-cute styles looks like a child for their species just because they are small or cute looking and you decide it is, regardless of how old the artist states their feral dragon or anthro petite fairy cat is, based on what you decide a child's body looks like for them.
Last, the charge against this stuff is mostly led by the same kind of bitchy anthro artists like the one above that've had a hate-on for mostly pokemon and digimon and other small cartoon character NSFW art since over a decade ago, when they complained that it hurts their image as "serious" anthro furry artists being next to cute cartoony sex stuff. Is it a wonder they specifically named pokemon and digimon?
Please wait a bit, there's over a month left, and I bdlieve they had some 90 day compliance deal after July 1st, too. This is more BS than their attempt to ban feral art over beastiality complaints (by the same people), and with how many artists and fans they've pissed off and insulted, the backlash will likely cause it to fail the same way the feral ban did. Talk to others and spread the word, fight to not be lumped in with actual real life pedos just because your characters are small or cute.
I think you shouldn't just give up so quick. You're far from alone, I've been reading journals of artists all over. There are tens of thousands of artists and their fans, millions of images since 2006 that would be hit by this subjective BS policy change. You should all talk to eachother and band together and resist. They are essentially implying that drawing fictional cute style chibi/small/kobold/imp body type animal or other fictional characters in adult situations is child porn and causes real life pedos to go hurt real life children, and that you are one of them if you draw or like them, it's extremely insulting.
Giving up and letting them win won't be the end of it, either, and would only affirm to FA and these mostly anthro artists pushing this change that drawing cute style cartoon animals etc. in adult situations == CP. And forcing you to post your stuff alongside actual cub art would just validate them.
My apologies for this rant, but their reasoning is as BS as "video games cause violence," or stating that posting gore, blood, vore, death and other violent stuff causes people to go out and beat or kill people or animals in real life, and the artists are just like them. Their "protecting minors" excuse falls apart the moment you realise they allow 13 year olds on FA, and are OK with posting a pregnant human 13 year old girl transformed into an eevee getting vored.
If they applied this subjective standard to everything, then all cute femboy teenage body type anthro art would be subjectively underage because you decided they look like they are. All pony characters would be by description "ponies", adolescent kid horses, and you could equally decide any character of any species in less-cute styles looks like a child for their species just because they are small or cute looking and you decide it is, regardless of how old the artist states their feral dragon or anthro petite fairy cat is, based on what you decide a child's body looks like for them.
Last, the charge against this stuff is mostly led by the same kind of bitchy anthro artists like the one above that've had a hate-on for mostly pokemon and digimon and other small cartoon character NSFW art since over a decade ago, when they complained that it hurts their image as "serious" anthro furry artists being next to cute cartoony sex stuff. Is it a wonder they specifically named pokemon and digimon?
Please wait a bit, there's over a month left, and I bdlieve they had some 90 day compliance deal after July 1st, too. This is more BS than their attempt to ban feral art over beastiality complaints (by the same people), and with how many artists and fans they've pissed off and insulted, the backlash will likely cause it to fail the same way the feral ban did. Talk to others and spread the word, fight to not be lumped in with actual real life pedos just because your characters are small or cute.
I mind end up waiting more due to irl circumstances (can't waste time on this BS anymore than I already did by having to reup my entire gallery elsewhere). I honestly don't think they'll backtrack and there's no telling when we'll be facing some other shitty policy in the future for no reason whatsoever, like this one. I do plan on continuing with my FA but I'm doing my best to move my activity somewhere else as I don't feel they (the team) value my sort of art here.
FA+

Comments