
So Yami porn isn't allowed on FA, as ridiculous as that is, here's a fun pic poking fun at the absolute worst executed policy in FA's history. Enjoy.
Art by my gal
chicostyxarts
Posted using PostyBirb
Art by my gal

Posted using PostyBirb
Category Artwork (Digital) / Digimon
Species Digimon
Size 2177 x 1693px
File Size 2.3 MB
Listed in Folders
I could keep coming up with sarcastic excuses to explain their logic, but then we'd be here all day, hah. On a serious note, though, I'm sorry the changes are affecting you. While they don't really affect me or any art I intend to post in the future, I never agreed with the changes myself because of how inconsistent they are. It's way too broad of a net that can be cast individually by each staff member, and it just turns into a situation where it feels like everyone gets punished because of a vastly smaller crowd that may have caused the changes in the first place.
Where are these furaffinity.net rules written or are they already gone?
Yes, it's a pity that some people perceive such characters as children, although they just have a big head. It turns out that this is a discrimination of one big head fetish.
Although I was still blocked in one social network for a picture where characters with a normal head mated, but their paws were visible like cats and therefore the picture looked cute. The support of the site said that these are children. That is, they block because the character is from a children's cartoon and the picture looks CUTE. If the paws are like a cat or a big head.
I, too, am completely normal with real children. The picture is just an artist's fantasy, it does not cause physical harm to anyone and the characters do NOT look at all like real human children as in the photographs. If you draw a character's ears not like a cat, but like a person or a monkey, then the character will cease to be attractive or even become ugly, the picture will become bad. These characters don't even exist in real life. What a pity that cute characters are banned in some social networks.
Yes, it's a pity that some people perceive such characters as children, although they just have a big head. It turns out that this is a discrimination of one big head fetish.
Although I was still blocked in one social network for a picture where characters with a normal head mated, but their paws were visible like cats and therefore the picture looked cute. The support of the site said that these are children. That is, they block because the character is from a children's cartoon and the picture looks CUTE. If the paws are like a cat or a big head.
I, too, am completely normal with real children. The picture is just an artist's fantasy, it does not cause physical harm to anyone and the characters do NOT look at all like real human children as in the photographs. If you draw a character's ears not like a cat, but like a person or a monkey, then the character will cease to be attractive or even become ugly, the picture will become bad. These characters don't even exist in real life. What a pity that cute characters are banned in some social networks.
I know why they put this policy in place, and I'm okay with them trying to crack down on people trying to abuse the fact digimon and pokemon can be any age by posting them as children. However them just banning everyone under this stupid umbrella policy is not the way to do it, and I'm quite frankly disappointed with Dragoneer for allowing this to get this far.
I don't agree that it is necessary to ban someone for drawings. I agree that people should be banned for posting pictures or videos of real human children on websites. If people look at real photos on the site then they will somehow generate income for the owner of the site and thus encourage the creation of new sexy photos or videos with children, which is unacceptable. But when pictures that are the imagination of the artist and that do not cause physical harm to anyone are banned, this is a stupid practice. These characters don't even exist in reality and they don't look like children at all, even a slight change in the appearance of these characters can make them look ugly. For example, I only like drawings, I don't like real photos, they are not attractive.
And I also do not agree that pictures can teach bad things. It used to be said that computer games in which you kill people can teach children to be bad and spoil their psyche, but in the modern world it is completely clear that this is an erroneous thinking. There are kind, sympathetic people who play computer games and their psyche has not become worse because of the games, and there are also eSports video game competitions that gather stadiums of fans around the world, much like in ordinary sports.
Perhaps Dragoneer went for it due to the fact that the site could be blocked in some countries. For example, inkbunny.net is banned in my country, but furaffinity.net is not banned.
However, people can use a VPN to bypass the block anyway.
And I also do not agree that pictures can teach bad things. It used to be said that computer games in which you kill people can teach children to be bad and spoil their psyche, but in the modern world it is completely clear that this is an erroneous thinking. There are kind, sympathetic people who play computer games and their psyche has not become worse because of the games, and there are also eSports video game competitions that gather stadiums of fans around the world, much like in ordinary sports.
Perhaps Dragoneer went for it due to the fact that the site could be blocked in some countries. For example, inkbunny.net is banned in my country, but furaffinity.net is not banned.
However, people can use a VPN to bypass the block anyway.
Comments