Are talon-resistant controllers expensive?

Materials science isn't quite up to the task, so I just replace them when they wear out!

sure it is, use metal buttons

Nice picture! Wonder if he would be good at jrpg’s like the persona series

My Holy Trinity of classic JRPGs is Final Fantasy 1, SaGa 2, and Dragon Quest 3.

That’s interesting. Most of the older games I like are either Pokémon starfox or the call of duty games for the DS

Take out those [CAW]-ing PT boats!

Heeee!

"Press F to flap." Now, if you had some kind of wing-tracking sensors you could rig up a pretty cool control system even aside from flight sims.

Sure could!

So intense, his eyes turned from green to blue

(I know nothing about CoD, but what a bluescreen)

I think that's an artifact of the cleanup I did for the image.

Like your art uvu

I love the art I commission, be sure to thank the artists too! :)

The only justification to ever buy an 8k monitor. You need hawk eyes to see any benefit.

https://www.furaffinity.net/view/9242594/

I actually have two 4K monitors, and yeah, sometimes they feel excessive.

Always a problem for manufacturers. The resolution of even a 4k under as-close-as-is-comfortable viewing condition easily exceeds that of the human eye - but the customers still demand higher numbers. In most living rooms, anything over 1080p is a waste. But then how do you convince people to buy new, more expensive televisions?

Similar story in audio equipment and services. Humans hearing is, at best, up to 20KHz - and that's for children. Mine maxes out at 16KHz, I've measured it. So you can show with mathematical proof that they get no benefit from a sample rate over 44.1KHz (A little margin is needed to allow for real-world imperfections in the analog filtering). Yet still, so many companies boast of their 48KHz, 96KHz, even 192KHz sample rates. Utterly pointless for consumers! And similar story for bit depth: 16 is enough.

Maybe the target market for this stuff is just birds and bats.

Today I learned. Though in anthroworld, perhaps more relevant?

But I do use all of my screens, most of the time.

Certain species might pay a premium for displays that go beyond the baseline. Speakers with super-tweeters. Screens and cameras with extreme resolution and four color channels.

A lot of birds would see regular TVs as distinctly red-tinted due to the lack of ultraviolet reproduction.

Interesting, thanks for the heads up.