Category Artwork (Digital) / Comics
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1200 x 1875px
File Size 1.11 MB
Listed in Folders
Oh this is wonderful. Since you have shown us some of where this is going the absolute last thing I would have expected from the Fun Box is Snakes and Ladders.
As for Arkansas Hawthorne? Brash Texan perhaps. (The Lone Star button is a nice touch. :) ) But I know of some people who would be very excited to play and lose games with a certain element of danger to them, if and when they could bring themselves to risk it.
As for Arkansas Hawthorne? Brash Texan perhaps. (The Lone Star button is a nice touch. :) ) But I know of some people who would be very excited to play and lose games with a certain element of danger to them, if and when they could bring themselves to risk it.
Generally true. Be it noted also that the definitions of winning and losing can vary based on personal taste.
Oh, by the way, I should mention that it was good my coffee was down on the desktop when Snakes and Ladders was revealed, 'cause if I'd been drinking it I would have spit it all over everything.
Oh, by the way, I should mention that it was good my coffee was down on the desktop when Snakes and Ladders was revealed, 'cause if I'd been drinking it I would have spit it all over everything.
I haven't really thought of board games as spiritual before. Interested to hear about how that works! I may just have a religious hall of worship in my house, haha.
I was wondering how things could go from snakes and ladders to where we were in earlier pages...but as of the last panel I think I have a guess }:)
I was wondering how things could go from snakes and ladders to where we were in earlier pages...but as of the last panel I think I have a guess }:)
Ah, you want dangerous games?
https://www.reddit.com/media?url=ht.....abd60343f74f61
https://www.reddit.com/media?url=ht.....abd60343f74f61
The scene on this page is a little highlight for me - there are so many nuances of Sudarsini's personality here. And only you, Mulefoot, know, which of these were intentional and which of them are interpreted into the lioness's nature by my very own imagination.
The whole time I was wondering what the box might have in store, and when it is finally opened, there are "only" board games inside, some of them - I'll mention Pachisi - even games for children, though Sudarsini claims otherwise. On top the lioness stands in front of Hawthorne with a serious expression and full of conviction talking about strategy and spirituality, almost acting as if only the most educated creatures among them play children's games.
When I read this page for the first time, I wondered if she was serious. I looked at the slides a second time - there was no doubt, the lioness meant every word she said. At that moment, Sudarsini seemed so wonderfully naive to me. As a lioness and matriarch, we have come to know her as strong, commanding, confident and unquestioning, and now she reveals a little bit of naivety. At the same time, this brief moment of naivety is so wonderfully fitting for a lioness, because cats are often said to have a certain arrogance - in this case it is her firm belief that everyone would praise her for her sophistication just because she plays parlor games. Her self-confident gestures fit in with this.
Even though I had Google to teach me »Mokshapat« actually exists and also has spiritual traits, it does not refute every thought I had about Sudarsini. However, the scene does not tell us whether Sudarsini wants to challenge Hawthorne with her feigned naivety and ultimately lure him into a trap. Nor does the scene tell us whether the lions really enjoy the Palor games so much or whether those games serve them as a tolerable pastime for those days in a lioness month when Sinh and Walter cannot do anything for their amusement.
Is Sudarsini just manipulative as hell? Is she particularly good at reading character traits, alluring Hawthorne into a trap? Or is she a little bit naive, framed by a natural arrogance of a cat?
Anyway, this is a wonderful page.
The whole time I was wondering what the box might have in store, and when it is finally opened, there are "only" board games inside, some of them - I'll mention Pachisi - even games for children, though Sudarsini claims otherwise. On top the lioness stands in front of Hawthorne with a serious expression and full of conviction talking about strategy and spirituality, almost acting as if only the most educated creatures among them play children's games.
When I read this page for the first time, I wondered if she was serious. I looked at the slides a second time - there was no doubt, the lioness meant every word she said. At that moment, Sudarsini seemed so wonderfully naive to me. As a lioness and matriarch, we have come to know her as strong, commanding, confident and unquestioning, and now she reveals a little bit of naivety. At the same time, this brief moment of naivety is so wonderfully fitting for a lioness, because cats are often said to have a certain arrogance - in this case it is her firm belief that everyone would praise her for her sophistication just because she plays parlor games. Her self-confident gestures fit in with this.
Even though I had Google to teach me »Mokshapat« actually exists and also has spiritual traits, it does not refute every thought I had about Sudarsini. However, the scene does not tell us whether Sudarsini wants to challenge Hawthorne with her feigned naivety and ultimately lure him into a trap. Nor does the scene tell us whether the lions really enjoy the Palor games so much or whether those games serve them as a tolerable pastime for those days in a lioness month when Sinh and Walter cannot do anything for their amusement.
Is Sudarsini just manipulative as hell? Is she particularly good at reading character traits, alluring Hawthorne into a trap? Or is she a little bit naive, framed by a natural arrogance of a cat?
Anyway, this is a wonderful page.
I just wanna sneak in and say I love how you draw your characters (especially Hawthorne, but I'm biased towards deer ahaha). The realistic facial structure, attention to detail, and even how you texture them gives the characters an almost, tactile(?) feeling I don't know how else to describe. Looking over bits and pieces of the comic, it fits really well.
I always want to err more towards the animal side on anthros, but you do it exquisitely without cutting down on accuracy, while still managing to capture such expression. It's awesome!
I always want to err more towards the animal side on anthros, but you do it exquisitely without cutting down on accuracy, while still managing to capture such expression. It's awesome!
No need to sneak. Doesn't matter if a thread is old if the art is new to you. I especially enjoy comments like these on older posts.
Its a fun challenge to keep their faces as natural as possible but yet still get emotion across without relying on eyebrows. :)
I guess it makes sense it fits my comic being I'm doing the stories that I feel work within my own abilities and tastes.
Again, thank you.
Its a fun challenge to keep their faces as natural as possible but yet still get emotion across without relying on eyebrows. :)
I guess it makes sense it fits my comic being I'm doing the stories that I feel work within my own abilities and tastes.
Again, thank you.
FA+



Comments