
No, I won't stop drawing them. >:C
Adrian is squeeing SO FUCKING HARD here. Dimas is too, you just...can't tell...as much. FFF THEY SO CUTE. ;~;
The lighting isn't meant to be exactly realistic or anything, but I did try some new things here. Yay? And, uh, they're on a roof, by the way. XD (...Dimas is also looking uncommonly bishie here. Uh. Not sure where that came from.) And Adrian's like fifteen here, NOT THAT ANYONE PROBABLY CARES.
Adrian & Dimas © Katherine Butler & Ivan Rathe
Adrian is squeeing SO FUCKING HARD here. Dimas is too, you just...can't tell...as much. FFF THEY SO CUTE. ;~;
The lighting isn't meant to be exactly realistic or anything, but I did try some new things here. Yay? And, uh, they're on a roof, by the way. XD (...Dimas is also looking uncommonly bishie here. Uh. Not sure where that came from.) And Adrian's like fifteen here, NOT THAT ANYONE PROBABLY CARES.
Adrian & Dimas © Katherine Butler & Ivan Rathe
Category Artwork (Digital) / Anime
Species Mammal (Other)
Size 850 x 1185px
File Size 672.2 kB
Well, I don't think the moon does as much directionally as the sun does, in terms of light sources. On nights with a full moon, it sort of ~PERMEATES EVERYWHERE~.
...That said, any kind of light source does cast shadows and have a direction and stuff, so yeah. It would be mostly behind them. XD
Thanks, yo. :D
...That said, any kind of light source does cast shadows and have a direction and stuff, so yeah. It would be mostly behind them. XD
Thanks, yo. :D
Adrian's mouth TERRIFIES me. I mean, I know that mouths do look sort of like that but holy crap I do not want to have THAT looking at me.
It does have a really nice atmosphere, though, and I love what you did with the clouds.
Dimas's face looks sort of... well his jaw goes upwards all sharply like that, and it doesn't seem like there's really enough, well, room for his mouth?
But the hair is just really nice. And the lighting on it, even if maybe not correct (I don't actually know; I'm not an expert) is really nice looking all soft and shiny but not too shiny and just nice.
I have said nice here so many times wow I am bad with words what does "nice" even mean
It does have a really nice atmosphere, though, and I love what you did with the clouds.
Dimas's face looks sort of... well his jaw goes upwards all sharply like that, and it doesn't seem like there's really enough, well, room for his mouth?
But the hair is just really nice. And the lighting on it, even if maybe not correct (I don't actually know; I'm not an expert) is really nice looking all soft and shiny but not too shiny and just nice.
I have said nice here so many times wow I am bad with words what does "nice" even mean
I dunno, I like it. :B And it's not just I DREW THIS SO I LIKE IT, I actually am drawing mouths that way now because I already sort of like styles like that. ...Did that make sense?
Thank you. :B
I guess you're probably right, if we're analyzing with...~realistic anatomy~. XD Though I'm not completely sold that there wouldn't be enough room -- it's just not exactly how realistic jaw lines look either. BUT HEY, STYLIZATION MAKES THE WORLD GO 'ROUND. It's just kind of up in the air which styles work and which don't, and a lot of that can also be individual preference and what looks "right" (in quotes because, if it's stylized, it's not gonna be actually right in any case) to individual people and whatnot.
HAIR IS THE BEST EVER, even though I was really kind of lazy with the shading here. (I wasn't trying to put too many hours into this, though, so that's one reason why, haha.)
Also thanks on the lighting. ;~; I'm not quite sure if it's technically correct either (like, I know what I mean with the whole MOONLIGHT PERMEATES EVERYTHING thing, but there are, like, no photos of moonlit scenes anywhere on the Internet, gah)...and I also know what you mean about the shiny but not too shiny and YEAH.
NICE MEANS GOOD WHICH MEANS YOU APPROVE WHICH IS ALSO GOOD. I MEAN NICE. :D
Thank you. :B
I guess you're probably right, if we're analyzing with...~realistic anatomy~. XD Though I'm not completely sold that there wouldn't be enough room -- it's just not exactly how realistic jaw lines look either. BUT HEY, STYLIZATION MAKES THE WORLD GO 'ROUND. It's just kind of up in the air which styles work and which don't, and a lot of that can also be individual preference and what looks "right" (in quotes because, if it's stylized, it's not gonna be actually right in any case) to individual people and whatnot.
HAIR IS THE BEST EVER, even though I was really kind of lazy with the shading here. (I wasn't trying to put too many hours into this, though, so that's one reason why, haha.)
Also thanks on the lighting. ;~; I'm not quite sure if it's technically correct either (like, I know what I mean with the whole MOONLIGHT PERMEATES EVERYTHING thing, but there are, like, no photos of moonlit scenes anywhere on the Internet, gah)...and I also know what you mean about the shiny but not too shiny and YEAH.
NICE MEANS GOOD WHICH MEANS YOU APPROVE WHICH IS ALSO GOOD. I MEAN NICE. :D
holy crap that was a lot of reply.
uh I don't actually thing I've got that much to respond to... About the moonlight things... I think that's probably got a lot to do with the limitations of photo cameras. I mean, they have a lens, but that lens is infinitely more simple than the ones we have in our own eyes: they just can't so easily adapt to different forms of light. For example if there's a brightly lit place, with a bit in the shade, then either the brightly lit part will have to compensate for being able to see the shadowed bit the way our eyes see, or the shaded place will have to compensate for the bright bit, whereas our eyes can see both just fine with mere microseconds of adjustment. And it's probably the same with moonlit scenes, except worse, because camera lenses are ALREADY quite shoddy in the dark compared to in the light.
and as for proportions and styles and shit, I guess I can't really say much about that. I mean it's probably quite important to have a good grip on the realistic first and then work your way to how you interpret it, rather than skipping straight to the interpreting part, but... I dunno, I don't know what you do. Maybe you do that, and it would be rather hypocritical of me to go saying that you HAVE to do that right here and now, especially since you seem to only be drawing as a hobby, at least right now.
and sheesh why do I type so much when I don't even have much to say?
uh I don't actually thing I've got that much to respond to... About the moonlight things... I think that's probably got a lot to do with the limitations of photo cameras. I mean, they have a lens, but that lens is infinitely more simple than the ones we have in our own eyes: they just can't so easily adapt to different forms of light. For example if there's a brightly lit place, with a bit in the shade, then either the brightly lit part will have to compensate for being able to see the shadowed bit the way our eyes see, or the shaded place will have to compensate for the bright bit, whereas our eyes can see both just fine with mere microseconds of adjustment. And it's probably the same with moonlit scenes, except worse, because camera lenses are ALREADY quite shoddy in the dark compared to in the light.
and as for proportions and styles and shit, I guess I can't really say much about that. I mean it's probably quite important to have a good grip on the realistic first and then work your way to how you interpret it, rather than skipping straight to the interpreting part, but... I dunno, I don't know what you do. Maybe you do that, and it would be rather hypocritical of me to go saying that you HAVE to do that right here and now, especially since you seem to only be drawing as a hobby, at least right now.
and sheesh why do I type so much when I don't even have much to say?
Yeah, but you can't edit comments here, so...LONG COMMENT TRAIN.
I know there are some cameras that are really good at capturing things (even in moonlight), though. If you do a slow capture photo, I think that helps with getting night scenes. But yeah, nothing was online, so I just sort of went off memory because WHATEVER THIS WAS BASICALLY A GLORIFIED DOODLE.
Drawing is literally all I have (well, aside from writing), so it is far more than just a hobby. Yes, I was only doing it for fun when we used to talk a couple of years ago. In the past couple of years or so, though, it's become so much more.
...Well. It is mostly for my fun, yes. But that doesn't mean I don't take it seriously. And I would like to be a professional someday, because I can't think of anything else I would be happy doing.
And, uh, I'd definitely say I understand faces and realistic proportions...? I mean, you're not there when you watch me draw or in my head when I'm drawing, so I don't know if there's a way to CLEARLY convince you of that, especially since I am messing with proportions on purpose. But, uh, anyway: I was in a figure drawing class (and while I failed it, that had nothing to do with my art; it had to do with me dropping out of school overall that semester), and my teacher never gave me a harsh critique on my art. He'd go around telling other people "oh, that leg looks too long" or "oh, you need to twist their torso more like this", and then he'd get to me and basically just tell me good job, with a few very minor suggestions that never had to do with actual anatomy. It wasn't that he particularly liked me so he let me get off easy, I apparently did have a firm grasp on these sorts of things. When we were looking at a model, I drew the proportions you find in reality, and he liked my art. When I'm drawing for myself, I change a few minor things (especially to stylize faces) to satisfy the character variations I want to express, and I like my art. The point is, I can draw realistically by now -- or at least, more reaslitically. But why would I do that aside from when I have to in class? That's just boring.
I don't know, I do it too. XD
I know there are some cameras that are really good at capturing things (even in moonlight), though. If you do a slow capture photo, I think that helps with getting night scenes. But yeah, nothing was online, so I just sort of went off memory because WHATEVER THIS WAS BASICALLY A GLORIFIED DOODLE.
Drawing is literally all I have (well, aside from writing), so it is far more than just a hobby. Yes, I was only doing it for fun when we used to talk a couple of years ago. In the past couple of years or so, though, it's become so much more.
...Well. It is mostly for my fun, yes. But that doesn't mean I don't take it seriously. And I would like to be a professional someday, because I can't think of anything else I would be happy doing.
And, uh, I'd definitely say I understand faces and realistic proportions...? I mean, you're not there when you watch me draw or in my head when I'm drawing, so I don't know if there's a way to CLEARLY convince you of that, especially since I am messing with proportions on purpose. But, uh, anyway: I was in a figure drawing class (and while I failed it, that had nothing to do with my art; it had to do with me dropping out of school overall that semester), and my teacher never gave me a harsh critique on my art. He'd go around telling other people "oh, that leg looks too long" or "oh, you need to twist their torso more like this", and then he'd get to me and basically just tell me good job, with a few very minor suggestions that never had to do with actual anatomy. It wasn't that he particularly liked me so he let me get off easy, I apparently did have a firm grasp on these sorts of things. When we were looking at a model, I drew the proportions you find in reality, and he liked my art. When I'm drawing for myself, I change a few minor things (especially to stylize faces) to satisfy the character variations I want to express, and I like my art. The point is, I can draw realistically by now -- or at least, more reaslitically. But why would I do that aside from when I have to in class? That's just boring.
I don't know, I do it too. XD
Rereading this, I realize that one teacher liking my art doesn't really prove anything.
But I haven't had problems in any of the art classes I've taken yet, despite being entirely self-taught. (And yes, they require you to draw realistically all the time.) THAT was more my point. XD
But I haven't had problems in any of the art classes I've taken yet, despite being entirely self-taught. (And yes, they require you to draw realistically all the time.) THAT was more my point. XD
Comments