So we are here for NATG Day 17. Today's prompt is: Draw a pony scared out of their wits / Draw a pony scared stiff.
Pinkie knows the potential risks of AI and she scares even when sees a logo of Open AI in the darkness. So spooky!...
Pinkie knows the potential risks of AI and she scares even when sees a logo of Open AI in the darkness. So spooky!...
Category Artwork (Digital) / My Little Pony / Brony
Species Pony (MLP)
Size 2139 x 1723px
File Size 2.61 MB
Most definitely. Not even a song could stop AI from interfering with Pinkie's playful plans. Perhaps she could use her 'Pinkie Sense' to know when it is approaching so that she can plan a way to overwhelm it with a lot of silly questions?
***
I am sure you have seen how many popular sites are forcing AI on everyone. There are valid uses for it, in my opinion, like in improving the ability for someone to look up content on the internet.
I just do not approve of how quickly it is being adopted along with, very likely, it is being built on software that has never been tested for user accessibility. (Since 2010, I have noticed that developers are more inclined to release incomplete / untested software to consumers since they feel it can always be fixed through patches. However, having worked in software development for a time, if you make something poorly the first time it is only going to get worse as you build and repair upon the broken foundation in which the software was initially released.).
***
Kind of related, I have noticed how the accessibility for the visually impaired player of Mortal Kombat 1 keeps getting both better and worse at the same time. For example, there are times you will perform a move that should include an [Audio Description] of what is being done by the one player to the other. However, with each update, there will be times where a character's actions are not described. There are other [Audio Description] mistakes that come and go with each update, but none should ever be there at all if proper testing was performed on the game during its initial development, pre-release, and before each update patch.
***
I am sure you have seen how many popular sites are forcing AI on everyone. There are valid uses for it, in my opinion, like in improving the ability for someone to look up content on the internet.
I just do not approve of how quickly it is being adopted along with, very likely, it is being built on software that has never been tested for user accessibility. (Since 2010, I have noticed that developers are more inclined to release incomplete / untested software to consumers since they feel it can always be fixed through patches. However, having worked in software development for a time, if you make something poorly the first time it is only going to get worse as you build and repair upon the broken foundation in which the software was initially released.).
***
Kind of related, I have noticed how the accessibility for the visually impaired player of Mortal Kombat 1 keeps getting both better and worse at the same time. For example, there are times you will perform a move that should include an [Audio Description] of what is being done by the one player to the other. However, with each update, there will be times where a character's actions are not described. There are other [Audio Description] mistakes that come and go with each update, but none should ever be there at all if proper testing was performed on the game during its initial development, pre-release, and before each update patch.
FA+

Comments