FA+
Shop
1181 submissions
O say can you see, by the dawn’s early light, What so proudly we hailed at the twilight’s last gleaming,
Whose broad stripes and bright stars, through the perilous fight, O’er the ramparts we watched, were so gallantly streaming?
And the rockets’ red glare, the bombs bursting in air,
Gave proof through the night that our flag was still there.
O say does that star-spangled banner yet wave O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave?
Be free. Be brave.
Whose broad stripes and bright stars, through the perilous fight, O’er the ramparts we watched, were so gallantly streaming?
And the rockets’ red glare, the bombs bursting in air,
Gave proof through the night that our flag was still there.
O say does that star-spangled banner yet wave O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave?
Be free. Be brave.
Category All / Pokemon
Species Dog (Other)
Size 1300 x 1734px
File Size 589.9 kB
Listed in Folders
It's good to see you're back; you were really missed around here. :3
Leaving the above aside, I must add that this is awesome, adorable, (very) beautiful, (very) enticing, interesting, inviting, (kinda) funny and (very) hot. And lastly, I must say that not only that's a good angle, a (very) nice side front view and a nice pose on Dawn's part, but she also looks THICC, firm, (very) cute, fluffy, (very) sexy, (very) gorgeous, in good shape, majestic, (very) stunning and a (a bit) cool too; great work by the way. <3
Leaving the above aside, I must add that this is awesome, adorable, (very) beautiful, (very) enticing, interesting, inviting, (kinda) funny and (very) hot. And lastly, I must say that not only that's a good angle, a (very) nice side front view and a nice pose on Dawn's part, but she also looks THICC, firm, (very) cute, fluffy, (very) sexy, (very) gorgeous, in good shape, majestic, (very) stunning and a (a bit) cool too; great work by the way. <3
I don't care what anyone else says, because this is a beautiful and sexy drawing with ALL its details, and no amount of undue hate towards it will make it any less great.
There's nothing triggering or vile about this at all. Just a good ol' American gal showing off~
There's nothing triggering or vile about this at all. Just a good ol' American gal showing off~
Only a few? They're all over the place, a veritable infestation. Call the exterminators! lol, but yeah, I totally agree with your statement. If only the two parties would actually work together on things instead of blocking each other just to spite them. But what do you expect of mil/billionaires that can't even manage to balance a checkbook?
Best to distract them with titties while people that know what they're doing sneak in and take over, lol.
Best to distract them with titties while people that know what they're doing sneak in and take over, lol.
The two parties actually do work together imo; it's just not for the benefit of the citizenry. That's why they never actually undo the damage the previous administration does. Inflate the government, devalue the currency, strip away freedoms/liberties piece by piece under the guise of safety and security from "the other side" while they secretly work together to use the other as a fulcrum for more power.
Why shouldn't they be mad? Trumpism is the root of everything that's wrong in this country. We have a president right now who acts without regard for the law, thinking of himself as a king and treating the constitution like it's just his personal toilet paper. If his actions don't make you uneasy, they definitely should.
Project 2025
Expanding the power of the executive branch and executive orders.
Within 6 months(180 days), a conservative presidency will withhold all federal permits and grants to any ISP that distributes anything considered pornkgrphic or obscene.
Meaning this website maybe banned.
Expanding the power of the executive branch and executive orders.
Within 6 months(180 days), a conservative presidency will withhold all federal permits and grants to any ISP that distributes anything considered pornkgrphic or obscene.
Meaning this website maybe banned.
Gotta remember before the uniparty drop kicked the Overton window to the left to divide the nation following OWS, Trump was a Democrat. He fucked a porn star, his wife is like 30yr younger than him. Internet censorship is not a part of the populist platform he is supported for.
This sort of fear-mongering nonsense is exactly the sort of crap that DIDN'T HAPPEN when Trump was elected. If anything, I saw blue states ramp up their own enforcement of exclusionary and corrupt law enforcement. Meanwhile, the worst that's happened in red areas is that the policies rolled out and signed into law were exactly what people voted for. Hardly a "threat to democracy" when democracy is what agreed on what should and should not be law.
Your TDS is showing and it's not a good look. I should know: I spent 3 years raging about the "Orange Hitler in the White House" before seeing reality.
"He's going to deport anyone who isn't white!"
"He's going to criminalize LGBTQIA+-UpDownLeftRightRightRightStart!"
"He's gonna start World War 3!"
"He's going to destroy our economy!"
"We won't have any more elections!"
Cool your jets, kid.
Worst case scenario, Mean Tweets are back, the extremist elements of the political Left are blunted a smidge (while continuing to firebomb churches and pregnancy centers), things simmer down a tiny bit between the US and BRICS, and policies are put in place that hold corrupt politicians accountable... without said policies doing anything, because Republicans are pushovers.
Grow the heck up.
FA is like a cockroach and Republicans are like a worn-out house slipper that only sees use when the hardwood floor gets chilly; nothing is going to change with your precious furry porn.
Your TDS is showing and it's not a good look. I should know: I spent 3 years raging about the "Orange Hitler in the White House" before seeing reality.
"He's going to deport anyone who isn't white!"
"He's going to criminalize LGBTQIA+-UpDownLeftRightRightRightStart!"
"He's gonna start World War 3!"
"He's going to destroy our economy!"
"We won't have any more elections!"
Cool your jets, kid.
Worst case scenario, Mean Tweets are back, the extremist elements of the political Left are blunted a smidge (while continuing to firebomb churches and pregnancy centers), things simmer down a tiny bit between the US and BRICS, and policies are put in place that hold corrupt politicians accountable... without said policies doing anything, because Republicans are pushovers.
Grow the heck up.
FA is like a cockroach and Republicans are like a worn-out house slipper that only sees use when the hardwood floor gets chilly; nothing is going to change with your precious furry porn.
Furthermore, I'd like to remind everyone that the person "in charge" right now (who said that signing executive orders "is not how democracy is supposed to work") signed a historic number of executive orders within the first week of taking office in 2021.
So... yeah.
Cope and seethe.
So... yeah.
Cope and seethe.
Strawman 1. No one's ever claimed that.
Strawman 2.
Republican states are banning any and all non gender or sexual conformance. You can theoretically now be executed in Florida for not wearing gender conforming clothing.
3. We'll wait and see. Point taken
4. The economy did fail under him. Unless you forgot the pandemic.
Thus proving I'm the last American with a long term memory
5. He tried to over throw the elections. That's why he was impeached the 2nd time.
If you recall he was aquited because and I quote "His term was over and it was not the duty of congress to convict a former president. That is the job of civil courts"
Meaning their argument was he was quilty, now charge him
Strawman 2.
Republican states are banning any and all non gender or sexual conformance. You can theoretically now be executed in Florida for not wearing gender conforming clothing.
3. We'll wait and see. Point taken
4. The economy did fail under him. Unless you forgot the pandemic.
Thus proving I'm the last American with a long term memory
5. He tried to over throw the elections. That's why he was impeached the 2nd time.
If you recall he was aquited because and I quote "His term was over and it was not the duty of congress to convict a former president. That is the job of civil courts"
Meaning their argument was he was quilty, now charge him
Honestly.
Even IF the democratic media was serious about this stuff, they already did themselves a disservice when they spread false information about Trump
(Especially when they tried to spread the idea of him being a racist, which there was no evidence supporting. Even when you dig far back in his younger days, I have never really seen any good evidence to support a lot of the crap they claimed he was)
I don't honestly like discussing politics in the open like this, but I will be honest that after they spread a lot of known false information like that, it really damaged their credibility with me on anything further they stated about Trump.
Even IF the democratic media was serious about this stuff, they already did themselves a disservice when they spread false information about Trump
(Especially when they tried to spread the idea of him being a racist, which there was no evidence supporting. Even when you dig far back in his younger days, I have never really seen any good evidence to support a lot of the crap they claimed he was)
I don't honestly like discussing politics in the open like this, but I will be honest that after they spread a lot of known false information like that, it really damaged their credibility with me on anything further they stated about Trump.
Outlaw pornography: TRUE
Project 2025’s Mandate for Leadership calls for the criminalization of pornography production, distribution, and consumption. Pornography has no claim to First Amendment protection and its purveyors are child predators and misogynistic exploiters of women. Their product is as addictive as any illicit drug and as psychologically destructive as any crime.
ಠ︵ಠ
Project 2025’s Mandate for Leadership calls for the criminalization of pornography production, distribution, and consumption. Pornography has no claim to First Amendment protection and its purveyors are child predators and misogynistic exploiters of women. Their product is as addictive as any illicit drug and as psychologically destructive as any crime.
ಠ︵ಠ
Trump appointed Christopher Miller, who wrote the Department of Defense chapter for Project 2025, to his administration. Specifically, Miller served as Secretary of Defense during the last month of Trump's first term. Additionally, John McEntee, a senior advisor for Project 2025 and former Trump aide, publicly acknowledged the project's work in preparation for a potential second Trump term.
No its a blue print for forcing Christian Nationalism on the nation.
And She wants to impeach them for lying under oath to congress. Because they lied under oath to congress.
Lemme ask you this.
If say the California National guard went into your state and started checking to see if you had registered all your guns under California Gun laws. What would happen?
And She wants to impeach them for lying under oath to congress. Because they lied under oath to congress.
Lemme ask you this.
If say the California National guard went into your state and started checking to see if you had registered all your guns under California Gun laws. What would happen?
Trump literately said he would use "Operation Wetback" a 1954 Military operation as a starting point. He would use "Loyalist states" Gaurds and militia's to go into "Sanctuary cities"
So If the California national gaurd came into your state you would accept it as "The will of the president?"
If Biden put on his website he would "Solve the gun violence issue" By sending in troops to other states. YOu would say "Thats just Biden pandering to his base." And not worry about that?
So If the California national gaurd came into your state you would accept it as "The will of the president?"
If Biden put on his website he would "Solve the gun violence issue" By sending in troops to other states. YOu would say "Thats just Biden pandering to his base." And not worry about that?
Why are you still freaking out about project 2025? It’s from a 3rd party organization and trump has no affiliation with it. All of this I found out by reading the Wikipedia article. You are so worried about the lies democrats are feeding you and you are just gobbling it up, meanwhile you should be paying attention to Agenda 2030 which would be entirely more restrictive to your freedoms and that is something that will be coming if democrats win.
Written by the same foundation that wrote most of Regean's policies from the 1980s?
I shouldn't be worried about people with a history of writing bad policies writing more policies and should be worried about an ineffective body's paper on "We should end poverty and hunger?"
What ever drugs you're on. They must be the good ones
I shouldn't be worried about people with a history of writing bad policies writing more policies and should be worried about an ineffective body's paper on "We should end poverty and hunger?"
What ever drugs you're on. They must be the good ones
The VA needs a complete reorg but that's part of the swamp. Too much embezzelment, too many bad officers and military command, it's a project that needs at least two terms worth of effort to fix and everyone has their hands in everyone else's pockets. Precious few people of this post's political persuasion think that the state of vet care in the country is adequate but unfortunately there are other things higher up on the food chain. Though I think the best solution is to send fewer soldiers off to become vets in the first place.
And as for guns vs women's rights, women don't need a license to go out in public. Some women aren't banned from certain states. Your concern over abortion access isn't about men wanting to control women, it's about believing abortion to be murderering a baby, and that's a philosophical divide you're probably.never going to resolve. :/
And as for guns vs women's rights, women don't need a license to go out in public. Some women aren't banned from certain states. Your concern over abortion access isn't about men wanting to control women, it's about believing abortion to be murderering a baby, and that's a philosophical divide you're probably.never going to resolve. :/
I still think it's ignorant at best to believe in Trump.
First of all, he's yet another grifter running for office; the election is just one grifter against another. Look at what he said about abortion over the years and how he uses Christianity to get the Republican vote but won't bother to talk about his favorite part of the Bible to prove he actually is a devout believer. Instead he just says that's "personal", which is weird considering quotes like "We worship God, not government" and "My favorite book is the Bible" in office.
And even worse, dude endorsed Marjory "Space lasers caused a wild fire, global warming is a good thing" Greene then went on to have dinner with Nick Fuentes and Kanye West. He's willing to associate himself with utter batshit.
Even if you give him benefit of the doubt on shit like how he got caught boasting about him touching women without their consent and assume he's bettered himself after these years, man's still doing shit like this. Oh, and he was a friend of Epstein. And yet his cultists will call everyone who doesn't like him a [Oops, I can't say this word].
At the end of the day, even if these people don't seem like assholes on the surface, I think their idea says something about them. Either that there's knowledge they're missing(in which case, I wouldn't necessarily say they are bad people), or maybe you *should* be judgemental towards them for endorsing harmful ideas. Even when they're not the kind to do January 6th shit. I don't think every single one of them is a bad person, but their idea sure is bad.
First of all, he's yet another grifter running for office; the election is just one grifter against another. Look at what he said about abortion over the years and how he uses Christianity to get the Republican vote but won't bother to talk about his favorite part of the Bible to prove he actually is a devout believer. Instead he just says that's "personal", which is weird considering quotes like "We worship God, not government" and "My favorite book is the Bible" in office.
And even worse, dude endorsed Marjory "Space lasers caused a wild fire, global warming is a good thing" Greene then went on to have dinner with Nick Fuentes and Kanye West. He's willing to associate himself with utter batshit.
Even if you give him benefit of the doubt on shit like how he got caught boasting about him touching women without their consent and assume he's bettered himself after these years, man's still doing shit like this. Oh, and he was a friend of Epstein. And yet his cultists will call everyone who doesn't like him a [Oops, I can't say this word].
At the end of the day, even if these people don't seem like assholes on the surface, I think their idea says something about them. Either that there's knowledge they're missing(in which case, I wouldn't necessarily say they are bad people), or maybe you *should* be judgemental towards them for endorsing harmful ideas. Even when they're not the kind to do January 6th shit. I don't think every single one of them is a bad person, but their idea sure is bad.
Bible/Christianity stuff: He's being a politician, every politician panders to demos they have problems attracting, thats.an unfortunate side of American politics.
"Grab em by the pussy" was surreptitiously recorded locker room talk and was probably figurative. You're telling me you have never shared a nasty or lewd comment about an attractive person with someone you trusted in private?
And Trump was at one point "friends" with Epstien, but everyone who makes that point leaves out that Trump dissociated from him years before 2016 and barred him from the Maralago. Kanye is usually crazy but he's famous and Trump likes rubbing shoulders with famous people. I don't remember who Nick Fuentes is, I have my own shit to deal with and only so much brainpower to remember every name that comes up in the ever accelerating carousel of the political zeitgeist. I just note that none of these are policy positions, it's all character. You make no points about what he did in office only what he said and who he associated with.
"Grab em by the pussy" was surreptitiously recorded locker room talk and was probably figurative. You're telling me you have never shared a nasty or lewd comment about an attractive person with someone you trusted in private?
And Trump was at one point "friends" with Epstien, but everyone who makes that point leaves out that Trump dissociated from him years before 2016 and barred him from the Maralago. Kanye is usually crazy but he's famous and Trump likes rubbing shoulders with famous people. I don't remember who Nick Fuentes is, I have my own shit to deal with and only so much brainpower to remember every name that comes up in the ever accelerating carousel of the political zeitgeist. I just note that none of these are policy positions, it's all character. You make no points about what he did in office only what he said and who he associated with.
Yeah, fair enough, some of the stuff I said there is outdated and it wouldn't hurt me to do better than that.
Regardless, it's hard not to attack Trump for being full of it when his it carries over into his policies.
For example, take his policy on "gender ideology", today's hot topic of the culture war, he spewed last year: he falsely claimed that children are being physically mutilated, and he just talks about transitioning one-sidedly. No acknowledgement that puberty blockers are often reversible, no acknowledgement that some trans-affirming care can also treat cancer, doesn't mention that socially transitioning is different from physically transitioning. It demonstrates his ignorance on the subject of "gender ideology", yet he's just saying what any outta-touch conservative with the spiciest and most poorly researched takes on transitioning. Which yeah, minors generally should not have permanent physical changes made, but what hospital is mutilating childrens' genitals? Where are these children? Who are they? Who is mutilating these genitals? Where's the evidence?
Not talking about circumcision or intersex medical interventions(which seriously, anti-trans activists will build their whole careers on "protecting children from mutilation" but never bring this up), of course, since that doesn't fit the anti-trans narrative.
He even says he will sign an executive order instructing every federal agency to "cease all programs promoting the concept of transition *at any age*". Which, paired with how ignorant some of the stuff he said here was, is a red flag.
And then he ludicrously claimed that the "radical left" invented the concept that somebody could be just "a few years ago".
It's not a position of reason and morality. It's a position of emotion, ignorance, and fearmongering.
And need I explain why "I will get Mexico to pay for that wall" is an unrealistic expectation? Low-hanging fruit from years ago, I know, but has the dude really changed that much since? Dude just makes up a bunch of shit just to preach about to his supporters, who will just believe it without evidence.
There are countless lies documented by him.
I don't see any good reason to be voting for this dude or buying for his slop-I mean merch. What's so great about him?
At the end of the day, both candidates are just old grifters in a "democracy" arguing embarrassingly over who daddy Netanyahu's best son is, donating a hell of a lot more money to colonizing Palestine than doing anything about student loan debt. But I'd rather choose the one who spreads fewer lies and isn't a cult leader.
Evidently Trump claims he didn't know anything about Nick Fuentes before the dining event, so for the sake of steelmaning, I'll give him benefit of the doubt on that. Which Nick has certainly said some questionable things to say the least, known for backpedaling and implying the government will kill him after he says something palletable like "I don't deny that mass shootings happen".
Regardless, it's hard not to attack Trump for being full of it when his it carries over into his policies.
For example, take his policy on "gender ideology", today's hot topic of the culture war, he spewed last year: he falsely claimed that children are being physically mutilated, and he just talks about transitioning one-sidedly. No acknowledgement that puberty blockers are often reversible, no acknowledgement that some trans-affirming care can also treat cancer, doesn't mention that socially transitioning is different from physically transitioning. It demonstrates his ignorance on the subject of "gender ideology", yet he's just saying what any outta-touch conservative with the spiciest and most poorly researched takes on transitioning. Which yeah, minors generally should not have permanent physical changes made, but what hospital is mutilating childrens' genitals? Where are these children? Who are they? Who is mutilating these genitals? Where's the evidence?
Not talking about circumcision or intersex medical interventions(which seriously, anti-trans activists will build their whole careers on "protecting children from mutilation" but never bring this up), of course, since that doesn't fit the anti-trans narrative.
He even says he will sign an executive order instructing every federal agency to "cease all programs promoting the concept of transition *at any age*". Which, paired with how ignorant some of the stuff he said here was, is a red flag.
And then he ludicrously claimed that the "radical left" invented the concept that somebody could be just "a few years ago".
It's not a position of reason and morality. It's a position of emotion, ignorance, and fearmongering.
And need I explain why "I will get Mexico to pay for that wall" is an unrealistic expectation? Low-hanging fruit from years ago, I know, but has the dude really changed that much since? Dude just makes up a bunch of shit just to preach about to his supporters, who will just believe it without evidence.
There are countless lies documented by him.
I don't see any good reason to be voting for this dude or buying for his slop-I mean merch. What's so great about him?
At the end of the day, both candidates are just old grifters in a "democracy" arguing embarrassingly over who daddy Netanyahu's best son is, donating a hell of a lot more money to colonizing Palestine than doing anything about student loan debt. But I'd rather choose the one who spreads fewer lies and isn't a cult leader.
Evidently Trump claims he didn't know anything about Nick Fuentes before the dining event, so for the sake of steelmaning, I'll give him benefit of the doubt on that. Which Nick has certainly said some questionable things to say the least, known for backpedaling and implying the government will kill him after he says something palletable like "I don't deny that mass shootings happen".
Well, those millions of europeans and asians simply don't know any better and they are all in for a rude awakening.
I mean, if super rich old geezer becomes a felon, he gets to campaign for becoming president but if an ordinary average joe like you or me becomes a felon, we get sent to prison and never get to vote again, ever, for as long as we live.
I don't think that's very fair and that seems to be the US in a nutshell: if you're super rich, the US is awesome and you can do whatever you want and get away with it but if you're not super rich, you get stomped to the curb.
I mean, if super rich old geezer becomes a felon, he gets to campaign for becoming president but if an ordinary average joe like you or me becomes a felon, we get sent to prison and never get to vote again, ever, for as long as we live.
I don't think that's very fair and that seems to be the US in a nutshell: if you're super rich, the US is awesome and you can do whatever you want and get away with it but if you're not super rich, you get stomped to the curb.
The first step of fixing a problem is admitting there is a problem.
At the time of me writing this, the US is not a great country. It's not the worst country in the world but that doesn't automatically make it a great country.
The US has the potential to become a great country however.
The question is: do you love your country enough that you are willing see its flaws and want to fix them instead of simply ignoring them and telling yourself "everything is fine" over and over again.
I guess time will tell as this is a question you can only answer to yourself.
Personally: I would like for the US to be a great country. I think that would be nice. Especially since a lot of my friends live there. The grim reality for the time being however is that the US is not a great country and that is sad and heartbreaking.
At the time of me writing this, the US is not a great country. It's not the worst country in the world but that doesn't automatically make it a great country.
The US has the potential to become a great country however.
The question is: do you love your country enough that you are willing see its flaws and want to fix them instead of simply ignoring them and telling yourself "everything is fine" over and over again.
I guess time will tell as this is a question you can only answer to yourself.
Personally: I would like for the US to be a great country. I think that would be nice. Especially since a lot of my friends live there. The grim reality for the time being however is that the US is not a great country and that is sad and heartbreaking.
Trump was convicted a felon by ideologically driven jurors in a trial presided over by a judge who donated to Trump's political opposition, on charged that literally amount to incorrect paperwork.
The first president in US history charged and convicted of a crime was done over paperwork.
Not Nixon's malarkey. Not Bush doing the Saudi's bidding in Iraq. Not Obama drone striking a US citizen without a trial. No. Trump was convicted of paying someone he slept with to sign a NDA.
The first president in US history charged and convicted of a crime was done over paperwork.
Not Nixon's malarkey. Not Bush doing the Saudi's bidding in Iraq. Not Obama drone striking a US citizen without a trial. No. Trump was convicted of paying someone he slept with to sign a NDA.
Nothing of what you just said has anything to do with the criticism I raised.
If you, an average, ordinary person with an ordinary, average, income would be convicted as a felon, you would go to prison for X amount of time, you would lose your right to vote until the day you died and you would also lose many other privileges, the right to own firearms for example that many of you americans are so obsessed with.
But a super rich person who has a ton of money and who can afford the best of lawyers, they get to walk away without spending a single day in jail and they don't lose any of their rights.
That is my point of criticism.
Depending on how wealthy you are, you will be treated differently by Law and Justice.
If you, an average, ordinary person with an ordinary, average, income would be convicted as a felon, you would go to prison for X amount of time, you would lose your right to vote until the day you died and you would also lose many other privileges, the right to own firearms for example that many of you americans are so obsessed with.
But a super rich person who has a ton of money and who can afford the best of lawyers, they get to walk away without spending a single day in jail and they don't lose any of their rights.
That is my point of criticism.
Depending on how wealthy you are, you will be treated differently by Law and Justice.
Germany doesn't need to be on the world stage to be one of the wealthiest nations with one of the highest standards of living in the world. There's advantages of being the quiet one in the background that nobody notices in a fight.
I am frustrated though that my country isn't properly honoring the NATO pledges, I will agree with you on that one. I would prefer it the other way. I would prefer for Germany to do what Poland has been doing since Russia invaded Ukraine: arming itself to the teeth. The polish got the right idea and are a lot smarter than my government is in that respect.
I am frustrated though that my country isn't properly honoring the NATO pledges, I will agree with you on that one. I would prefer it the other way. I would prefer for Germany to do what Poland has been doing since Russia invaded Ukraine: arming itself to the teeth. The polish got the right idea and are a lot smarter than my government is in that respect.
Germany has become an absolute shitshow in the last 10/15 years. And with Schroeder STILL sucking off Putin? No surprise.
Their infrastructure is in worse shape than the American. Any yes, I have seen both. If you want them to STFU about their "superority" ask them the following.
Stuttgart21, Gorch Fock, Elbphilharmonie and Berlin Brandenburg have what in common? Then watch their head explode LOL
Their infrastructure is in worse shape than the American. Any yes, I have seen both. If you want them to STFU about their "superority" ask them the following.
Stuttgart21, Gorch Fock, Elbphilharmonie and Berlin Brandenburg have what in common? Then watch their head explode LOL
I don't know. I would hope not. I don't think this is how it is here or further up north, in scandinavia but I'm not sure. It's definitely not how it should be happening in a country that likes to stylize itself as "the greatest country in the world". At least that's my personal opinion.
I don't think that Trump's and by extension the Republicans approach into making america great again is the right one.
Also conservatives don't like us furries very much.
I don't think that Trump's and by extension the Republicans approach into making america great again is the right one.
Also conservatives don't like us furries very much.
Why did Germany have one? The real reason. 'Not saying that the angry mustache man was right by any means, certainly not. I got ancestors in those chambers. But there was something that made the German people desperate to get out of where the country was going.
And what's the problem with Nationalism, anyways? Germany should be for Germans, Africa fr Africans, America for Americans. It doesn't mean new people are pushed out if they assimilate to the culture of the nation that it's from.
This simping for Globalism as if it, in of itself, is a betterment of the host nation, seems like a total lie to many; and it needs to be repackaged and sold with better skill and tact then "Muh foreigners culturally enrich us". I got no problem with anyone of any nationality coming here, if they follow the proper channels and act like an American. People in Germany should act like Germans, people in Africa should act like Africans.
Globalism is just Colonization with a smile painted across it's soft-invading face.
And what's the problem with Nationalism, anyways? Germany should be for Germans, Africa fr Africans, America for Americans. It doesn't mean new people are pushed out if they assimilate to the culture of the nation that it's from.
This simping for Globalism as if it, in of itself, is a betterment of the host nation, seems like a total lie to many; and it needs to be repackaged and sold with better skill and tact then "Muh foreigners culturally enrich us". I got no problem with anyone of any nationality coming here, if they follow the proper channels and act like an American. People in Germany should act like Germans, people in Africa should act like Africans.
Globalism is just Colonization with a smile painted across it's soft-invading face.
I see two major problems with nationalism, the first one being that it usually comes at the exclusion or detriment of the interests of other nations and that's how wars start. The second one is that nationalism usually entails forcing your beliefs on others, often at gunpoint and anything that doesn't align with those beliefs will be destroyed with extreme prejudice.
There is no freedom of expression or speech in an environment dominated by nationalism and people like you and me, furries, wouldn't be allowed to exist in such an environment.
You may complain "censorship" for getting a kicked off an Online platform if you say bad things but at the very least you won't actually have to worry about Secret Police kicking in your door and dragging you off to be never seen again. With nationalism, that is exactly what is going to happen if you live in a nationalistic environment.
Nationalism means this: https://www.furaffinity.net/view/57107153/
As for the other stuff, I'm not gonna bother addressing that because it reads like it was written by some sheltered kid that never ever left his home country and only knows the rest of the world through television... no offense mate but yikes, that last thing you wrote there? super duper ultra cringe.
you should travel some more, beyond the borders of the US, see and experience new things. that's all I gotta say to that.
There is no freedom of expression or speech in an environment dominated by nationalism and people like you and me, furries, wouldn't be allowed to exist in such an environment.
You may complain "censorship" for getting a kicked off an Online platform if you say bad things but at the very least you won't actually have to worry about Secret Police kicking in your door and dragging you off to be never seen again. With nationalism, that is exactly what is going to happen if you live in a nationalistic environment.
Nationalism means this: https://www.furaffinity.net/view/57107153/
As for the other stuff, I'm not gonna bother addressing that because it reads like it was written by some sheltered kid that never ever left his home country and only knows the rest of the world through television... no offense mate but yikes, that last thing you wrote there? super duper ultra cringe.
you should travel some more, beyond the borders of the US, see and experience new things. that's all I gotta say to that.
And you think empires that want to expand their borders to include the entire world instead of just a single nation state, -don't- do so at the exclusion and/or detriment of the interests of other nations? They don't start WORLD wars instead of just border skirmishes for sovereignty? Same thing; Globalists/Globally stretching empires are always doing things at gunpoint; how do you think they enforce their global policy and social changes?
You state that there's no freedom of expression or speech in Nations, but that'd be up to the Nation's Constitution, or whatever version of it they contain, to maintain. If you honestly think there's no censorship in not-National regimes any more or less then international regimes, then I dunno man. Sounds pretty ignorant of history of human behavior, where the more power any person or entity has, the more censorious it becomes. While my nation's policies state you have the freedom to speak (though that's been eroding, admittedly, though also more coincidentally as the typical pro-international regime gets put into place), the ones that want to expand beyond their borders or flood themselves with non-natives are constantly landing fines and jail time for speaking out against such acts.
The message of the image is confusing. How is improving the internal workings of a nation; resulting in gulags, limited to a government for a bordered nation exclusively. Perhaps that's the view of a sheltered family man who doesn't feel like diluting our borders into other countries. I don't need to travel to understand what I feel is morally right. I don't want big global governments. They tend to get more and more corrupt the bigger they get. Historically, it leads in genocides.
I don't care if you think it's cringe. Governments suck, and Bigger governments (global ones included more so) such worse. They always have.
I guess by the following
You state that there's no freedom of expression or speech in Nations, but that'd be up to the Nation's Constitution, or whatever version of it they contain, to maintain. If you honestly think there's no censorship in not-National regimes any more or less then international regimes, then I dunno man. Sounds pretty ignorant of history of human behavior, where the more power any person or entity has, the more censorious it becomes. While my nation's policies state you have the freedom to speak (though that's been eroding, admittedly, though also more coincidentally as the typical pro-international regime gets put into place), the ones that want to expand beyond their borders or flood themselves with non-natives are constantly landing fines and jail time for speaking out against such acts.
The message of the image is confusing. How is improving the internal workings of a nation; resulting in gulags, limited to a government for a bordered nation exclusively. Perhaps that's the view of a sheltered family man who doesn't feel like diluting our borders into other countries. I don't need to travel to understand what I feel is morally right. I don't want big global governments. They tend to get more and more corrupt the bigger they get. Historically, it leads in genocides.
I don't care if you think it's cringe. Governments suck, and Bigger governments (global ones included more so) such worse. They always have.
I guess by the following
I didn't say "there's no freedom of expression and speech in Nations".
I did say "there's no freedom of expression and speech in Nationalism".
That is a difference and I do stand by that. The topic of nationalism, what it is, how it works and what its dangers are, is often brought up and discussed in my country on account of my country having been ruled by a nationalistic regime for 12 years, much to the detriment to the rest of the world.
With nationalism, there is one thing and only thing: the state and its interests. Nothing else will be tolerated, including being a furry. Likewise, any kind of criticism will also not be tolerated and brutally suppressed.
A core part of nationalism is creating a homogeneous national identity.
Sure, that doesn't sound to bad at first... Until you are slowly but gradually encouraged to stop enjoying certain things because they aren't Insert-Nation-Here enough.
You are discouraged from enjoying stuff not made or focused around your Nation.
Before 1933, Germany had a very strong community of "Swing Kids", Teenagers and Young Adults who enjoyed Swing music.
After a certain nationalistic group came into power and began their rule, Swing was declared "Un-german" because it didn't come from germany, swing was something that originated from the US and the UK.
People who were caught listening to swing music or owning records of that type of music were punished with imprisonment and even harsher punishments. Many Swing Kids were sent to concentration camps where they died alongside the LGBTQ and the Jews.
Nationalism may not start with "we'll imprison or murder you if we catch you listening to foreign music" but ultimately, that is always where nationalism is heading towards.
Nationalism is not a good thing. It never was, it never will be.
I did say "there's no freedom of expression and speech in Nationalism".
That is a difference and I do stand by that. The topic of nationalism, what it is, how it works and what its dangers are, is often brought up and discussed in my country on account of my country having been ruled by a nationalistic regime for 12 years, much to the detriment to the rest of the world.
With nationalism, there is one thing and only thing: the state and its interests. Nothing else will be tolerated, including being a furry. Likewise, any kind of criticism will also not be tolerated and brutally suppressed.
A core part of nationalism is creating a homogeneous national identity.
Sure, that doesn't sound to bad at first... Until you are slowly but gradually encouraged to stop enjoying certain things because they aren't Insert-Nation-Here enough.
You are discouraged from enjoying stuff not made or focused around your Nation.
Before 1933, Germany had a very strong community of "Swing Kids", Teenagers and Young Adults who enjoyed Swing music.
After a certain nationalistic group came into power and began their rule, Swing was declared "Un-german" because it didn't come from germany, swing was something that originated from the US and the UK.
People who were caught listening to swing music or owning records of that type of music were punished with imprisonment and even harsher punishments. Many Swing Kids were sent to concentration camps where they died alongside the LGBTQ and the Jews.
Nationalism may not start with "we'll imprison or murder you if we catch you listening to foreign music" but ultimately, that is always where nationalism is heading towards.
Nationalism is not a good thing. It never was, it never will be.
" didn't say "there's no freedom of expression and speech in Nations".
I did say "there's no freedom of expression and speech in Nationalism"."
I'd counter that the situation entirely depends on how that said nation is ran. There's international groups that had their opposition silenced for dissidence as well; censorship and authoritarianism isn't bound just to owning borders. Ask any country that was taken over by another.
Yes, as a German, you have the unfortunate bias of having the worst case situation be your leading example. Meanwhile, my nation told the Crown to go fuck itself. There can be pros and cons to either side of this occasion, but you and Wolvenne seem to think it HAS to be some sort of dichotomy, and I simply refuse to accept those terms. Can some be? Certainly. North Korea is quite censorious and stays in it's dimly lit borders. China keeps expanding, and has the same type of censorship.
Or do you consider expanding Empires as Nationalistic still? Hrm, maybe that's the disconnect we're having here. Or maybe it's just Europe and the US have different ideas of how Nation states should be ran. We don't go to jail or fines for face-book posts.. least not yet., heh.
But yeah, he made a bad Nationalistic state, I'm not contesting that. There's so many cultures in the US's nation that work well together without having to become something different like you describe.
I did say "there's no freedom of expression and speech in Nationalism"."
I'd counter that the situation entirely depends on how that said nation is ran. There's international groups that had their opposition silenced for dissidence as well; censorship and authoritarianism isn't bound just to owning borders. Ask any country that was taken over by another.
Yes, as a German, you have the unfortunate bias of having the worst case situation be your leading example. Meanwhile, my nation told the Crown to go fuck itself. There can be pros and cons to either side of this occasion, but you and Wolvenne seem to think it HAS to be some sort of dichotomy, and I simply refuse to accept those terms. Can some be? Certainly. North Korea is quite censorious and stays in it's dimly lit borders. China keeps expanding, and has the same type of censorship.
Or do you consider expanding Empires as Nationalistic still? Hrm, maybe that's the disconnect we're having here. Or maybe it's just Europe and the US have different ideas of how Nation states should be ran. We don't go to jail or fines for face-book posts.. least not yet., heh.
But yeah, he made a bad Nationalistic state, I'm not contesting that. There's so many cultures in the US's nation that work well together without having to become something different like you describe.
The libertarian convention booed Trump specifically because he is authoritarian, with the explicit message, "No Wannabe Dictators!" A libertarian wants freedom from government intervention, and a wannabe dictator is antithetical to that goal.. obviously. A libertarian is opposed to government mandate, and should be against the government's banning of 'pronouns', muslims, weed, forcing religious teachings in school, wholesale ban of abortion and more. These are explicitly anti-conservative values that I doubt the modern MAGA "conservative" would endorse.
If by '2 brain cells to rub together' you mean abandon all principles that make the libertarian party what it is, then sure, capitalize away.
You seem not to be aware of what libertarians actually stand for, or when to use than/then. To assume the right to free speech would be maintained in a nationalistic society is a touch naive, even if we drop the Germany "cheat" and look at the Trump brand of nationalism, its echoes, and what's promised if left unchecked. If you're unaware of examples, your concern for free speech seems little more than cosplay from my vantage point.
To add, We The People, are multicultural. Is a natural born citizen not American, if they do not 'act' "American", in this melting pot? Africa is freaking huge.. Should someone tell Egyptians they gotta act South African or they're bullshitters? At what point does our culture become unAmerican; the culture of Boston is drastically different than Dallas but both are apologetically 'American'.. Is it borders, really?.. Maybe we should vote on qualities of an 'American'. Heck, why even vote? It's as obvious as Dawn's fake tiddies!
Americans should act like Americans, yeah? Give us your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free. - Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. No taxation without representation. Land of the Free: shall we place an asterisk? Maybe that's commie bullshit though, and it's more American to turn a can'o Bud Light into a sieve with your AR.
The end result being, if folks in America are to act like Americans, are you even American, bro? Do you feel you're representing the American 'culture' proper? I hope so, your existence depends on it.
Happy 4th, I'm off on a flight with Rand Paul and Ron Johnson to Moscow.
If by '2 brain cells to rub together' you mean abandon all principles that make the libertarian party what it is, then sure, capitalize away.
You seem not to be aware of what libertarians actually stand for, or when to use than/then. To assume the right to free speech would be maintained in a nationalistic society is a touch naive, even if we drop the Germany "cheat" and look at the Trump brand of nationalism, its echoes, and what's promised if left unchecked. If you're unaware of examples, your concern for free speech seems little more than cosplay from my vantage point.
To add, We The People, are multicultural. Is a natural born citizen not American, if they do not 'act' "American", in this melting pot? Africa is freaking huge.. Should someone tell Egyptians they gotta act South African or they're bullshitters? At what point does our culture become unAmerican; the culture of Boston is drastically different than Dallas but both are apologetically 'American'.. Is it borders, really?.. Maybe we should vote on qualities of an 'American'. Heck, why even vote? It's as obvious as Dawn's fake tiddies!
Americans should act like Americans, yeah? Give us your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free. - Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. No taxation without representation. Land of the Free: shall we place an asterisk? Maybe that's commie bullshit though, and it's more American to turn a can'o Bud Light into a sieve with your AR.
The end result being, if folks in America are to act like Americans, are you even American, bro? Do you feel you're representing the American 'culture' proper? I hope so, your existence depends on it.
Happy 4th, I'm off on a flight with Rand Paul and Ron Johnson to Moscow.
And who does the Libertarian Party nominate? Do they even seem to be a Libertarian themselves? Last few didn't seem so, though I would agree Rand Paul is a good option; always has been. But to think Trump is an authoritarian? How? Didn't get rid of any of his opponents, didn't stop the protests or riots, didn't use any connections to silence the media from talking smack about him. He's got his flaws, for sure, but Authoritarian? Dictators? That's one hell of a reach unless someone can show a video of him proposing massive government over-reach. And I'll give you the Bump Stock Ban was an infringement to the 2nd amendment. What else was there?
Perhaps the MAGA people up in these mountains are different then the ones in your areas? Most of em here a pot smoking business owners that just want to be left alone and have cheap gas + grocery prices again. But hey, maybe it's a regional thing, I'll accept that as a possibility. Most of these ones don't care about any of the pronoun stuff, just don't go forcing it on their family.
Oh hah hah, yeah, I'm not the best at spelling. Keep it on topic without the personal digs, would ya?
I don't see how it's naive, nor why one would dictate necessarily that they can't say what they want to say just because they maintain their own social borders. FFS, you can talk smack about American while living in America, same thing with Canada or nearly any country in the Western cultures. Where's the lack of freedom to express contentment against their regimes, be it for Nationalistic ones or International ones?
Yes, our nation is about melting pot concepts; long as the culture being inserted follows within certain understandings; typically by the Constitution. 'Can't steal, rape, murder, stuff like that. Doesn't matter who you pray to or anything like that. As to what makes it unAmerican, that's a good question. I'd state anything that violates those above mentioned Constitutional protections.
Perhaps the MAGA people up in these mountains are different then the ones in your areas? Most of em here a pot smoking business owners that just want to be left alone and have cheap gas + grocery prices again. But hey, maybe it's a regional thing, I'll accept that as a possibility. Most of these ones don't care about any of the pronoun stuff, just don't go forcing it on their family.
Oh hah hah, yeah, I'm not the best at spelling. Keep it on topic without the personal digs, would ya?
I don't see how it's naive, nor why one would dictate necessarily that they can't say what they want to say just because they maintain their own social borders. FFS, you can talk smack about American while living in America, same thing with Canada or nearly any country in the Western cultures. Where's the lack of freedom to express contentment against their regimes, be it for Nationalistic ones or International ones?
Yes, our nation is about melting pot concepts; long as the culture being inserted follows within certain understandings; typically by the Constitution. 'Can't steal, rape, murder, stuff like that. Doesn't matter who you pray to or anything like that. As to what makes it unAmerican, that's a good question. I'd state anything that violates those above mentioned Constitutional protections.
Please don't take my statement/question here as bashy or rude.
What rights do women not have in this country? I am genuinely curious... I hear a lot about the subject, but a lot of the answers I get are very vague or cannot be supported with any hard evidence without logical reasoning. For example, The gender pay gap that keeps getting brought up. But there's a lot of reason as to why men on average DO make slightly more than the average woman. Gender doesn't have anything to do with it either. Companies will do ANYTHING to pinch any penny they can get to go to profits and If women were paid less and cheaper to hire. Wouldn't companies then steer to hire only woman in their workforce?
Once again, I am not tryna come off rude or anything I am simply just applying some questions that have popped to me so many times that I have done my research on to gather that conclusion.
I could sit here for hours and lay out several things that is not socially acceptable for me to do as what they would call a "cis" white male.
What rights do women not have in this country? I am genuinely curious... I hear a lot about the subject, but a lot of the answers I get are very vague or cannot be supported with any hard evidence without logical reasoning. For example, The gender pay gap that keeps getting brought up. But there's a lot of reason as to why men on average DO make slightly more than the average woman. Gender doesn't have anything to do with it either. Companies will do ANYTHING to pinch any penny they can get to go to profits and If women were paid less and cheaper to hire. Wouldn't companies then steer to hire only woman in their workforce?
Once again, I am not tryna come off rude or anything I am simply just applying some questions that have popped to me so many times that I have done my research on to gather that conclusion.
I could sit here for hours and lay out several things that is not socially acceptable for me to do as what they would call a "cis" white male.
The US government has acknowledged that it conducted secret biological and drug tests on its own citizens and military personnel. The documents are now declassified and can be found on the CIA's website. Additionally, there was the entire Panama invasion mess in December 1989, which was illegal and had a complete media blackout. The military drove over cars with innocent families inside and rounded up and arrested people who have never been seen again. There was absolutely no armed resistance. Anyone who believes America has ever been truly great is living in a fantasy.
You know, you're right. I shouldn't have wasted my time. But when I see the corruption and danger to our democracy it's sometimes hard to stay quiet when I see people mindlessly championing a wannabe dictator.
If he and the GOP take power again, everyone will regret it. Left wing, right wing, it won't matter, because you won't have that choice anymore. Goodbye freedom.
Oh and if you like porn? Because it feels like most right-wing furs LOVE their porn....
They want to ban that too.
If he and the GOP take power again, everyone will regret it. Left wing, right wing, it won't matter, because you won't have that choice anymore. Goodbye freedom.
Oh and if you like porn? Because it feels like most right-wing furs LOVE their porn....
They want to ban that too.
What "freedom"? A freedom of creepy colours and unhealthy body types but no chance to appreciate traditional beautiful characters? A freedom of political correctness? The entire world is being plagued by the poor taste of radical progressive groups (including furries) in the United States of America.
Try meeting conservatives that aren't furries and find out whether they will be equally as accepting. I generally got called things like "sick freak" when I mentioned that I was a furry to non-furry conservatives I met.
Also keep in mind that conservatives tried pushing this whole "litterboxes in schools for the furries" hoax a couple years back, conservative content creators like Ben Shapiro or Matt Walsh generally don't have many nice things to see about furries whenever they mention furries and conservative comedy shows like the Daily Wire's Mr. Birchum or X's animated sitcom "The New Norm" also take swipes at furries and lug the furry community in together with the LGBTQ community.
Also keep in mind that conservatives tried pushing this whole "litterboxes in schools for the furries" hoax a couple years back, conservative content creators like Ben Shapiro or Matt Walsh generally don't have many nice things to see about furries whenever they mention furries and conservative comedy shows like the Daily Wire's Mr. Birchum or X's animated sitcom "The New Norm" also take swipes at furries and lug the furry community in together with the LGBTQ community.
You’re gonna hate it when I tell you there exists a good amount of conservative furries. This fandom isn’t only yours and is filled with a wide diversity of people. Quit being so selfish and echo chamber and actually interact with people and you’ll find a lot of people are incredibly nice and respectful.
I'm aware of that. Some conservatives also have a fondness for Star Trek, which seems a bit odd at first glance. The future portrayed in the series tends to reflect more liberal values and ideals, which makes their enjoyment of it somewhat surprising. Human behavior can be quite fascinating and unpredictable at times.
Only because the MAGA crowd is hyper fyxated on the broader LGBTQ community at the moment. Once they are done with that, they'll be coming after us, as usual.
They already tried with the litter box hoax a few years ago and they are taking swipes at us in shows like the New Norm.
Most MAGA seem to view us as degenerates and freaks. At least that's my experience with MAGA people who aren't furries.
They already tried with the litter box hoax a few years ago and they are taking swipes at us in shows like the New Norm.
Most MAGA seem to view us as degenerates and freaks. At least that's my experience with MAGA people who aren't furries.
And yet even ""conservatives"" are roastin The New Norm as cringy AF. Not everyone is the Daily Wire dude.
Some of us /are/ degenerates and freaks. There's outliers that unfortunately tarnished the good names of others. Not every leftist is a pedophile Maoist either, but there are some there ruining the reputation of the good ones in the bunch.
Some of us /are/ degenerates and freaks. There's outliers that unfortunately tarnished the good names of others. Not every leftist is a pedophile Maoist either, but there are some there ruining the reputation of the good ones in the bunch.
And I'm not going to defend ALL of the MAGA bunch either; I'm confident there's some bottom-of-the-barrel pieces of shit out there. 100%. It's statistically impossible to make the claim that ANY group is completely full of saint-like innocent people. I say that with absolute certainty. But collectivism is the stepping stone to the pathways of evil, spoken with the best of intentions often, that lead to the murder of m i l l i o n s of innocent people.
"There's a problem in our society. It's the fault of _____. They are The Others. Trust us bro, they spread lies! So lets strip them of their rights. Take their means of defense a secretly expanding and ever more tyrannical state. Persecute them for their Heresy! Shove them to the boxcars! Bash them with hammers! To the gas chambers! Kill the target and everyone he knows! FOR THE SAFETY OF SOCIETY!"
Meanwhile those whom had -nothing- to do with the plights of that culture/nation/continent/etc are getting tortured to faux-solve the problems (that the government that most-likely enacted the problem in the first place) and the government there itself grows. Again. And when that target couldn't be the cause of the problem anymore, it just magically shifts to a different, convenient target. We've seen this played out soooo many times in the 20th century.
I'd suggest check out a book called Ordinary Men. It shows how volunteer police from Nazi-occupied Poland were warped and corrupted by collectivist fear-mongering to do the evils we're familiar with in the 1930s-late 1940s. Just as a headsup; it's a haunting book. Chapter 9's recounting of the mass graves is absolutely horrific, and has made me quite resolute against any collectivist mindsets.
"There's a problem in our society. It's the fault of _____. They are The Others. Trust us bro, they spread lies! So lets strip them of their rights. Take their means of defense a secretly expanding and ever more tyrannical state. Persecute them for their Heresy! Shove them to the boxcars! Bash them with hammers! To the gas chambers! Kill the target and everyone he knows! FOR THE SAFETY OF SOCIETY!"
Meanwhile those whom had -nothing- to do with the plights of that culture/nation/continent/etc are getting tortured to faux-solve the problems (that the government that most-likely enacted the problem in the first place) and the government there itself grows. Again. And when that target couldn't be the cause of the problem anymore, it just magically shifts to a different, convenient target. We've seen this played out soooo many times in the 20th century.
I'd suggest check out a book called Ordinary Men. It shows how volunteer police from Nazi-occupied Poland were warped and corrupted by collectivist fear-mongering to do the evils we're familiar with in the 1930s-late 1940s. Just as a headsup; it's a haunting book. Chapter 9's recounting of the mass graves is absolutely horrific, and has made me quite resolute against any collectivist mindsets.
Can you blame them? They are outsiders and the only thing they know about Furries is what the media tells them. And the Media often does not portray furries in a positive light. And lets us not forget that furries often do things at Fur-cons in front of Joe Public that enforce those negative stereotypes.
I dunno, I have a gut feeling they wouldn't like us furries even if they got to know us a little better. The furry community has a lot of LGBTQ people in it and it is well known that a lot, if not most, of the MAGA people don't like LGBTQ people, what with all the groomer nonsense. Since there's a lot of people in the furry that are not straight, well... you can probably guess where that is going.
# My personal guess: If the MAGA people got to know us a little better, they might not call us degenerate freaks anymore (or at least not as often) but they'd move on to calling us something else, probably accusing us, the furry community, of harboring and sheltering groomers because of all the LGBTQ folks we have in the community.
That's my prediction anyways.
That's my prediction anyways.
In the mist of all the negative crap being posted on this piece...
I just wanna say, I have always loved how you detail the fur on your girls. Have taken up this in my own digital works as well. You inspired me as a 18 yr old to draw my own furs. I only recently started doing digital on a iPad.
I just wanna say, I have always loved how you detail the fur on your girls. Have taken up this in my own digital works as well. You inspired me as a 18 yr old to draw my own furs. I only recently started doing digital on a iPad.
I find the far right to be disturbing. The moderate left wing is terrifying. They are perpetuating the 'blood libel', that is, punishing the jews for claims that they are doing what they find to be the most abhorrent. In the 1700s, Jews were claimed to be vampires. before that, they were stealing babies. The jews are the fae of folklore.
The chief justice of the world court ran for office on a platform of anti-semitic tropes.
The UN human rights commission has had as members: Cuba, Sudan (which has slaves), China, North Korea, etc.
The only genocides in the middle east are of: Yazidis and Christians. The nations of the region have their stated claim of Jewish genocide, but have not succeeded, yet.
Notice that not a single human rights organization or women's rights organization has condemned the mass rape of Jewish girls as young as 12, where they were repeatedly raped until their pelvises were crushed. Jewish women had their breasts cut off. The captives are still being raped.
No leftist has spoken out against the depravities visited on the Jews. Why? They don't consider Jews to be human.
Iran's ousting of the Shah in 1979 was done by Marxists, not by religious extremists. The latter were invited in by the leftists. They then slaughtered leftists by the thousands.
The chief justice of the world court ran for office on a platform of anti-semitic tropes.
The UN human rights commission has had as members: Cuba, Sudan (which has slaves), China, North Korea, etc.
The only genocides in the middle east are of: Yazidis and Christians. The nations of the region have their stated claim of Jewish genocide, but have not succeeded, yet.
Notice that not a single human rights organization or women's rights organization has condemned the mass rape of Jewish girls as young as 12, where they were repeatedly raped until their pelvises were crushed. Jewish women had their breasts cut off. The captives are still being raped.
No leftist has spoken out against the depravities visited on the Jews. Why? They don't consider Jews to be human.
Iran's ousting of the Shah in 1979 was done by Marxists, not by religious extremists. The latter were invited in by the leftists. They then slaughtered leftists by the thousands.
You are 100% right. No leftist has complained about what was done to all those innocent civilians and what was done to all those women and children by their believed Hamas.
Still, the biggest idiots have to be the "Queers for Palestine" movement. Never have I seen such a bunch of brain-dead idiots! It's like watching Jews marching for Hitler! I wish there was a way to send them all to Palestine so they can march in Gaza. That way the Palestinians could show their appreciation to them personally.
But we all know leftists live in a fantasy world where ideology is everything and facts don't matter. So they wont realize their mistake until reality lines them up on the rooftops of Gaza and are flung off by those poor oppressed Hamas "freedom fighters" they love and support. And any leftist Queer for Palestine marcher who wants to cry and say I am wrong is free to pack their bangs and go to Gaza to prove me wrong by marching on Palestinian streets with their "Queers for Palestine" banners and flags.
Still, the biggest idiots have to be the "Queers for Palestine" movement. Never have I seen such a bunch of brain-dead idiots! It's like watching Jews marching for Hitler! I wish there was a way to send them all to Palestine so they can march in Gaza. That way the Palestinians could show their appreciation to them personally.
But we all know leftists live in a fantasy world where ideology is everything and facts don't matter. So they wont realize their mistake until reality lines them up on the rooftops of Gaza and are flung off by those poor oppressed Hamas "freedom fighters" they love and support. And any leftist Queer for Palestine marcher who wants to cry and say I am wrong is free to pack their bangs and go to Gaza to prove me wrong by marching on Palestinian streets with their "Queers for Palestine" banners and flags.
Hate is such a strong word. I just find it so mind blowing watching idiots marching for those who would kill them if given the chance. Ever sit down and wonder what would happen to all these gay and trans people and their pride parades if the religion of peace they blindly march for took over? There is a HUGE REASON why you will never seen a pride parade in an Islamic country, but the queer idiots around the world march on with their pro Hamas banners and watermelon balloons. *shrugs*
Anyways, time for me to go enjoy some Murican Fireworks as I dream of using Dawns' massive milk makers as a pillow for my big fat head <33
Anyways, time for me to go enjoy some Murican Fireworks as I dream of using Dawns' massive milk makers as a pillow for my big fat head <33
I don't think you understand what "Queers for Palestine" is about.
On October 7, Hamas killed 1200 Israelis. Since then, more than 30.000 Palestinians have been killed. That number is contested but assuming that number is accurate, that would mean that for every Israeli killed on October 7, 25 Palestinians were killed in return. Whether they be Hamas or not.
I and the majority of "Queers for Palestine" think that's plenty of blood to have been spilled to avenge the dead Israelis. Nevermind that Palestinian cities and settlements have been reduced to nothing but rubble.
Let me be clear: I and most of the "Queers for Palestine" folk, we have no love for Palestine or Palestinians. We do not love them or particular like them. Especially given their politics regarding us.
However
That doesn't mean we want to see them slaughtered on such a massive scale.
All we want is an end to the violence and the killing. That's all.
The victims of October 7 have been avenged.
On October 7, Hamas killed 1200 Israelis. Since then, more than 30.000 Palestinians have been killed. That number is contested but assuming that number is accurate, that would mean that for every Israeli killed on October 7, 25 Palestinians were killed in return. Whether they be Hamas or not.
I and the majority of "Queers for Palestine" think that's plenty of blood to have been spilled to avenge the dead Israelis. Nevermind that Palestinian cities and settlements have been reduced to nothing but rubble.
Let me be clear: I and most of the "Queers for Palestine" folk, we have no love for Palestine or Palestinians. We do not love them or particular like them. Especially given their politics regarding us.
However
That doesn't mean we want to see them slaughtered on such a massive scale.
All we want is an end to the violence and the killing. That's all.
The victims of October 7 have been avenged.
1. Are hostages still being held in random people's houses?
2. Is Hamas (A government who's goal is the death of Jews) still in power?
3. Is Hamas still launching rockets at random targets in Israel?
4. Hamas throws queers from rooftops and drags them behind motorcycles.
This is like saying that the Imperial Japanese government should have been left in power to slaughter Chinese people and rape Koreans because the USA killed enough of them after Pearl Harbor.
Queers for Palestine is a group of delusional anti-Semites who are comfortable with Jews being raped and killed.
2. Is Hamas (A government who's goal is the death of Jews) still in power?
3. Is Hamas still launching rockets at random targets in Israel?
4. Hamas throws queers from rooftops and drags them behind motorcycles.
This is like saying that the Imperial Japanese government should have been left in power to slaughter Chinese people and rape Koreans because the USA killed enough of them after Pearl Harbor.
Queers for Palestine is a group of delusional anti-Semites who are comfortable with Jews being raped and killed.
@ kittyelfie
I want to see Hamas dead as much as you do, the world is better off without these savage animals in it.
That isn't what's happening though.
For every Hamas killed, there is a disproportionate number of non-Hamas killed.
That isn't right.
Gaza has been reduced to rubble and is uninhabitable, permanently displacing over a million people because of the actions of a few.
Hamas needs to be hunted down, I completely agree with you.
I just don't think that hunting Hamas down indiscriminately is just.
If you don't care to separate between who is Hamas and thus, deserving of death and who is not Hamas and thus, not deserving of death, well...
That says a lot about who you really are.
I want to see Hamas dead as much as you do, the world is better off without these savage animals in it.
That isn't what's happening though.
For every Hamas killed, there is a disproportionate number of non-Hamas killed.
That isn't right.
Gaza has been reduced to rubble and is uninhabitable, permanently displacing over a million people because of the actions of a few.
Hamas needs to be hunted down, I completely agree with you.
I just don't think that hunting Hamas down indiscriminately is just.
If you don't care to separate between who is Hamas and thus, deserving of death and who is not Hamas and thus, not deserving of death, well...
That says a lot about who you really are.
Accusing Israel of indiscriminately killing civilians. Name one army in the history of earth that has sent food/water to its enemies during wartime (other than Israel). You'd have left the Nazis in power. You'd have left the Confederacy in power. You'd have left every murderous regime in power.
Do not reply. I do not want to hear from you. You are painfully stupid. Your replies give me migraines from the sheer idiocy and willful ignorance. This is a story about me trying to reason with you: https://movemequotes.com/when-argui.....and-the-tiger/
Do not reply. I do not want to hear from you. You are painfully stupid. Your replies give me migraines from the sheer idiocy and willful ignorance. This is a story about me trying to reason with you: https://movemequotes.com/when-argui.....and-the-tiger/
@ kittyelfie
I cannot reply to you because you choose to block me immediately after hurtling insults and wild accusations my way.
That is fine however as you made it very clear that you have no honest interest in holding a conversation.
So I am writing these lines not for you but for anyone who may stumble across them:
I do not believe that anyone is above criticism.
The Israel Defense force is without a doubt one of the best trained, best equipped and most powerful military forces in the world. Because of this, I hold them to a very high standard.
The Gaza war is one of the best recorded wars in human history.
While the IDF claims that it does everything within its power to minimize civilian casualties, I do not find these claims to be reflected in actual real life.
I am of the firm believe that the IDF could and should do a lot more than what they are doing right now.
That is my firm belief.
You, kittyelfie are of the firm belief that no matter what, Israel can do no wrong and is above criticism.
While I disagree with that, you certainly have the freedom to hold that belief and I have no intention or interest to change your mind.
I have no ill will towards you however and I hope that one day, you will mature a little more and be less emotional.
Have a nice day.
I cannot reply to you because you choose to block me immediately after hurtling insults and wild accusations my way.
That is fine however as you made it very clear that you have no honest interest in holding a conversation.
So I am writing these lines not for you but for anyone who may stumble across them:
I do not believe that anyone is above criticism.
The Israel Defense force is without a doubt one of the best trained, best equipped and most powerful military forces in the world. Because of this, I hold them to a very high standard.
The Gaza war is one of the best recorded wars in human history.
While the IDF claims that it does everything within its power to minimize civilian casualties, I do not find these claims to be reflected in actual real life.
I am of the firm believe that the IDF could and should do a lot more than what they are doing right now.
That is my firm belief.
You, kittyelfie are of the firm belief that no matter what, Israel can do no wrong and is above criticism.
While I disagree with that, you certainly have the freedom to hold that belief and I have no intention or interest to change your mind.
I have no ill will towards you however and I hope that one day, you will mature a little more and be less emotional.
Have a nice day.
"All we want is an end to the violence and the killing. That's all."
If this is true, then:
Why aren't any of these Queers For Palestine demanding the release of the hostages or condemning what has been and what is being done to the hostages?
Why are they chanting "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free" and "Revolution!!" if this is just only about , as you say, "ending the violence"?
Why are Queers for Palestine not demanding Hamas to end the violence considering that it was HAMAS who started this whole mess?
They show love for HAMAS and dead Palestinians but ZERO FUCKS given for their victims. As proven by several interviews where not one of them knew what "from the river to the sea" actually meant. I'm sure those at the top know. It's clear that Queers for Palestine are a bunch of ignorant idiots who don't even know what they are marching for since they are paid actors.
I saw we FOLLOW THE MONEY to see who's financing all of this.
If this is true, then:
Why aren't any of these Queers For Palestine demanding the release of the hostages or condemning what has been and what is being done to the hostages?
Why are they chanting "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free" and "Revolution!!" if this is just only about , as you say, "ending the violence"?
Why are Queers for Palestine not demanding Hamas to end the violence considering that it was HAMAS who started this whole mess?
They show love for HAMAS and dead Palestinians but ZERO FUCKS given for their victims. As proven by several interviews where not one of them knew what "from the river to the sea" actually meant. I'm sure those at the top know. It's clear that Queers for Palestine are a bunch of ignorant idiots who don't even know what they are marching for since they are paid actors.
I saw we FOLLOW THE MONEY to see who's financing all of this.
They aren't chanting for Hamas to end the violence because most of the violence and destruction being carried out at the moment is done by Israel.
The IDF has killed hostages that it was supposed to save. We know this. Likewise, the IDF has killed Aid Workers and a lot of journalists.
Nobody is trying to defend Hamas, I stated earlier that the world will be a better place without these savage animals in it and I stand by that.
You wanna go kill Hamas? Go for it, I'll cheer for you and buy you a drink for every Hamas member you kill.
This isn't what this is about though. It's about the rampant destruction and how Israel seemingly doesn't care who gets caught in the crossfire whenever they are shooting at suspected Hamas members.
There is also video evidence of IDF soldiers chanting there are no innocent civilians in Gaza, which has been presented and shown earlier this year to the International Court, so that's not really helping Israel's case here...
There's also Queer people amongst the Palestinians who gotta live in the closet out of fear for Hamas. Living like that is hard enough without having to worry about being bombed by Israel as collateral.
If Israel and by extend the IDF would be doing a better job at minimizing casaulties, which they are definitely capable of doing, we wouldn't see groups like Queers for Palestine show up.
It's simple:
Not every Palestinian is a member of Hamas.
What I want is for Hamas members to die.
What I do not want is for non-Hamas people to die.
Does that make sense?
The IDF has killed hostages that it was supposed to save. We know this. Likewise, the IDF has killed Aid Workers and a lot of journalists.
Nobody is trying to defend Hamas, I stated earlier that the world will be a better place without these savage animals in it and I stand by that.
You wanna go kill Hamas? Go for it, I'll cheer for you and buy you a drink for every Hamas member you kill.
This isn't what this is about though. It's about the rampant destruction and how Israel seemingly doesn't care who gets caught in the crossfire whenever they are shooting at suspected Hamas members.
There is also video evidence of IDF soldiers chanting there are no innocent civilians in Gaza, which has been presented and shown earlier this year to the International Court, so that's not really helping Israel's case here...
There's also Queer people amongst the Palestinians who gotta live in the closet out of fear for Hamas. Living like that is hard enough without having to worry about being bombed by Israel as collateral.
If Israel and by extend the IDF would be doing a better job at minimizing casaulties, which they are definitely capable of doing, we wouldn't see groups like Queers for Palestine show up.
It's simple:
Not every Palestinian is a member of Hamas.
What I want is for Hamas members to die.
What I do not want is for non-Hamas people to die.
Does that make sense?
They aren't chanting for Hamas to end the violence because most of the violence and destruction being carried out at the moment is done by Israel.
(How else are they supposed to weed out HAMAS? By asking them nicely to surrender? War is about defeating your enemy by destroying their ability to wage war and their will to fight. It's not this ridonkulas notion of "they kill 100, we only kill 100" that people seem to have)
The IDF has killed hostages that it was supposed to save. We know this. Likewise, the IDF has killed Aid Workers and a lot of journalists.
(This is what happens when HAMAS hides behind hostages and civilians, As for the AID workers, that was 100% BULLSHIT. The truck they claimed the IDF bomber was not an Aid truck because it was clearly seen in pictures that the truck was destroyed but all the Aid Banners on it were in pretty good condition. Like they were placed there AFTER the truck was destroyed. Must be one of those Magic Missiles the IDF has that doesn't destroy Aid Banners but destroys Trucks. As for those Journalists, they knew the risks of going to into a war zone. War zones are not safe places)
Nobody is trying to defend Hamas
(Queers for Palestine appear to be doing just that. I have yet to see a Queer for Palestine marcher demand the release of the hostage or show any compassion or care for the women and children raped and murdered by HAMAS.)
Israel seemingly doesn't care who gets caught in the crossfire whenever they are shooting at suspected Hamas members.
(sadly, civilians get caught in the crossfire because HAMAS HIDES BEHIND CIVILIANS. This sadly is unavoidable. At least Israel warns civilians to clear out before they bomb an area. But Hamas prevents them from leaving because Hamas uses civilian casualties for its propaganda war. And I don't recall HAMAS ever issuing warnings to Israeli civilians)
There is also video evidence of IDF soldiers chanting there are no innocent civilians in Gaza, which has been presented and shown earlier this year to the International Court, so that's not really helping Israel's case here...
(The International court is like a barking Chihuahua. It can cry and complain and issue decrees but they are powerless, so Israel has nothing to worry about from them. China laughs in the international courts face all the time!)
There's also Queer people amongst the Palestinians who gotta live in the closet out of fear for Hamas.
(Queer people in Palestine have a lot more to worry about than just HAMAS since all religion of peace variants frown upon "queers and fags". Ending HAMAS will not mean they can come out of hiding. So even if they got out of Palestine, being anywhere other than a western country would mean a death sentence for them, But even if they were not LGBTQ, no other Arab/Islamic country wants Palestinians in it. Even Egypt closed their borders the Palestine!)
It's simple:
Not every Palestinian is a member of Hamas.
(never heard anyone say they were)
What I want is for Hamas members to die.
(same here but Hamas hides behind civilians making it difficult)
What I do not want is for non-Hamas people to die.
(If non Hamas people want to live, considering they are the ones who put HAMAS into power in the first place, they should rise up and end HAMAS)
(How else are they supposed to weed out HAMAS? By asking them nicely to surrender? War is about defeating your enemy by destroying their ability to wage war and their will to fight. It's not this ridonkulas notion of "they kill 100, we only kill 100" that people seem to have)
The IDF has killed hostages that it was supposed to save. We know this. Likewise, the IDF has killed Aid Workers and a lot of journalists.
(This is what happens when HAMAS hides behind hostages and civilians, As for the AID workers, that was 100% BULLSHIT. The truck they claimed the IDF bomber was not an Aid truck because it was clearly seen in pictures that the truck was destroyed but all the Aid Banners on it were in pretty good condition. Like they were placed there AFTER the truck was destroyed. Must be one of those Magic Missiles the IDF has that doesn't destroy Aid Banners but destroys Trucks. As for those Journalists, they knew the risks of going to into a war zone. War zones are not safe places)
Nobody is trying to defend Hamas
(Queers for Palestine appear to be doing just that. I have yet to see a Queer for Palestine marcher demand the release of the hostage or show any compassion or care for the women and children raped and murdered by HAMAS.)
Israel seemingly doesn't care who gets caught in the crossfire whenever they are shooting at suspected Hamas members.
(sadly, civilians get caught in the crossfire because HAMAS HIDES BEHIND CIVILIANS. This sadly is unavoidable. At least Israel warns civilians to clear out before they bomb an area. But Hamas prevents them from leaving because Hamas uses civilian casualties for its propaganda war. And I don't recall HAMAS ever issuing warnings to Israeli civilians)
There is also video evidence of IDF soldiers chanting there are no innocent civilians in Gaza, which has been presented and shown earlier this year to the International Court, so that's not really helping Israel's case here...
(The International court is like a barking Chihuahua. It can cry and complain and issue decrees but they are powerless, so Israel has nothing to worry about from them. China laughs in the international courts face all the time!)
There's also Queer people amongst the Palestinians who gotta live in the closet out of fear for Hamas.
(Queer people in Palestine have a lot more to worry about than just HAMAS since all religion of peace variants frown upon "queers and fags". Ending HAMAS will not mean they can come out of hiding. So even if they got out of Palestine, being anywhere other than a western country would mean a death sentence for them, But even if they were not LGBTQ, no other Arab/Islamic country wants Palestinians in it. Even Egypt closed their borders the Palestine!)
It's simple:
Not every Palestinian is a member of Hamas.
(never heard anyone say they were)
What I want is for Hamas members to die.
(same here but Hamas hides behind civilians making it difficult)
What I do not want is for non-Hamas people to die.
(If non Hamas people want to live, considering they are the ones who put HAMAS into power in the first place, they should rise up and end HAMAS)
Considering that Hamas is actively hiding behind civilians, maybe dropping 2000 pounds bombs on them isn't the right course of action? Usually when somebody tries hiding behind civilians, you use a precision tool like a sniper to do the job, instead of using something that has a lot of splash damage.
You repeatedly and rightfully condemn Hamas for hiding behind civilians, as well you should but at the same time, you don't seem to be all that heartbroken about Israel not doing as much to minimize civilian casualties as it probably is capable of doing.
Israel is a western nation, one of the most modern, wealthy and best equipped. Israel's military reflects this since it ranks amongst the best military forces in the world. Israel could do better to minimize civilian casualties. Israel should do better to minimize civilian casualties.
Just because Hamas is the obvious evil villain here doesn't mean that Israel can do no wrong or is immune to criticism.
You repeatedly and rightfully condemn Hamas for hiding behind civilians, as well you should but at the same time, you don't seem to be all that heartbroken about Israel not doing as much to minimize civilian casualties as it probably is capable of doing.
Israel is a western nation, one of the most modern, wealthy and best equipped. Israel's military reflects this since it ranks amongst the best military forces in the world. Israel could do better to minimize civilian casualties. Israel should do better to minimize civilian casualties.
Just because Hamas is the obvious evil villain here doesn't mean that Israel can do no wrong or is immune to criticism.
A good way to silence to criticism and make yourself impervious to it however is by accusing any critical voices to be secretly agents of the evil villain, which I believe is the case with Queers for Palestine.
What better way to silence criticism and seize calls for peace than to denounce any groups voicing criticism and calls for peace as being secret puppets of the enemy?
Putin has been doing this in Russia for years after all and it would appear as though Netanyahu took notes.
What better way to silence criticism and seize calls for peace than to denounce any groups voicing criticism and calls for peace as being secret puppets of the enemy?
Putin has been doing this in Russia for years after all and it would appear as though Netanyahu took notes.
Sorry for the late reply. RL busy crap to deal with.
I never once said that Israel or anyone else can do no wrong or is immune to criticism.
So, you think Snipers are the solution to avoid civilian casualties? Then please explain to me how the Sniper using a little scope on their rifle is going to be able to tell the difference between a civilian and a Hamas form far far away when they look exactly the same.
If you have this amazing power to spot a Hamas among civilians from sniping distance, then you should join the Israeli Military! I'm sure they would pay you millions for that ability!
Now, if you have discovered or have some miraculous way that allows someone to differentiate between a civilian and a Hamas hiding amongst them, then please do tell!
I never once said that Israel or anyone else can do no wrong or is immune to criticism.
So, you think Snipers are the solution to avoid civilian casualties? Then please explain to me how the Sniper using a little scope on their rifle is going to be able to tell the difference between a civilian and a Hamas form far far away when they look exactly the same.
If you have this amazing power to spot a Hamas among civilians from sniping distance, then you should join the Israeli Military! I'm sure they would pay you millions for that ability!
Now, if you have discovered or have some miraculous way that allows someone to differentiate between a civilian and a Hamas hiding amongst them, then please do tell!
No worries, RL happens.
You're missing the point however.
The point is that dropping bombs and shelling places with ammunition that deals splash damage isn't the best tactic for minimizing civilian casualties or ensuring hostage survival.
If you collapse a building on somebody's head with explosives, you will definitely kill Hamas, no doubt about that. You'll also kill civilians and maybe even hostages because collapsing rubble doesn't discriminate.
That's my point.
I mean, let's assume a couple of bank robbers hole up in a bank and take hostages in your town...
I'm pretty sure if the police responded by simply blowing up the bank and burying everyone in the rubble, you'd be upset about that.
At least a little.
I hope.
I would be if that happened in my town anyway.
You're missing the point however.
The point is that dropping bombs and shelling places with ammunition that deals splash damage isn't the best tactic for minimizing civilian casualties or ensuring hostage survival.
If you collapse a building on somebody's head with explosives, you will definitely kill Hamas, no doubt about that. You'll also kill civilians and maybe even hostages because collapsing rubble doesn't discriminate.
That's my point.
I mean, let's assume a couple of bank robbers hole up in a bank and take hostages in your town...
I'm pretty sure if the police responded by simply blowing up the bank and burying everyone in the rubble, you'd be upset about that.
At least a little.
I hope.
I would be if that happened in my town anyway.
The main difference being that bank robbers are the ones holding the guns and often wearing masks while their hostages are on the floor or herded into a corner. And the cops are dealing with small numbers in a confined area. Not with a mass group of religious loons freely moving around and shooting from behind civilians and then hiding among them ready to cry the victim when any of their human shields gets hurt or killed. So your analogy doesn't apply well to this situation.
As I said in the past, Palestinian civilians should get the hell out of dodge, but Hamas wont let them leave and the ones that do manage to get out have nowhere to go because no Islamic or Arab country wants them. Gee, I wonder why that is.....
As I said in the past, Palestinian civilians should get the hell out of dodge, but Hamas wont let them leave and the ones that do manage to get out have nowhere to go because no Islamic or Arab country wants them. Gee, I wonder why that is.....
Yes, Hamas doesn't let the civilians leave. Does that make it okay to have bombs dropped on them anyways?
My answer to that question is a very clear "No, there has to be some other way".
What's your answer?
If you are struggling with this question and are having doubts that you don't want to voice, you can choose not to answer.
My answer to that question is a very clear "No, there has to be some other way".
What's your answer?
If you are struggling with this question and are having doubts that you don't want to voice, you can choose not to answer.
For me, my answer would be yes.
Do you honestly think that if some ahole who was trying to kill me tied innocent civilians to their car and then hid behind them and started shooting at me, I would not fire back because those civilians might get hit and die? I don't thing so!
I feel bad for the civilians but it was not me who put them in that situation and you trying to blame me is not going to make anything better or change that they were put there.
Now if you personally would allow someone to do that to you and you refuse to defend yourself in order to spare those civilians tied to the attackers car, then that's your choice. It definitely would not be mine. As the old saying goes, it's either me or them, and I rather it be them!
And on a positive note, the religion of peace members are all true believers! Dying for the cause is a one way ticket to paradise for them. So if they perish while I am defending myself from their murderous intent, then they will be in heaven with Allah and the dead shooter will get his 72 virgins. It's a win win for them!
Do you honestly think that if some ahole who was trying to kill me tied innocent civilians to their car and then hid behind them and started shooting at me, I would not fire back because those civilians might get hit and die? I don't thing so!
I feel bad for the civilians but it was not me who put them in that situation and you trying to blame me is not going to make anything better or change that they were put there.
Now if you personally would allow someone to do that to you and you refuse to defend yourself in order to spare those civilians tied to the attackers car, then that's your choice. It definitely would not be mine. As the old saying goes, it's either me or them, and I rather it be them!
And on a positive note, the religion of peace members are all true believers! Dying for the cause is a one way ticket to paradise for them. So if they perish while I am defending myself from their murderous intent, then they will be in heaven with Allah and the dead shooter will get his 72 virgins. It's a win win for them!
Would you say the same if the civilians in question were your fellow americans instead of palestinians?
P.S.
if you are not american, then obviously replace "your fellow americans" with "your fellow insert-your-home-nation-here".
I wrote "your fellow americans" because I got the impression that you are american. if that assumption is incorrect, then I do apologize.
P.S.
if you are not american, then obviously replace "your fellow americans" with "your fellow insert-your-home-nation-here".
I wrote "your fellow americans" because I got the impression that you are american. if that assumption is incorrect, then I do apologize.
So what I am supposed to do? Stand there and let you keep trying to kill me because you're a coward who's using innocents as a shield to hide behind while trying to kill me?
Like I said, to defend myself, yes I would. Their blood would be on your hands since you put them in that situation.
Seriously. You remind me a lot of the leftists who cried about Kids in cages.
When Clinton built the cages: SILENCE!!
When Obama put kids in cages: SILENCE!!
When Trump Became President: OMG KIDS IN CAGES!!! REEEEEEEE!!!
When Biden Became President: Silence once again!!!
I'm going to wager that when Trump becomes president again, the "Kids in Cages" whining will make it's return.
Like I said, to defend myself, yes I would. Their blood would be on your hands since you put them in that situation.
Seriously. You remind me a lot of the leftists who cried about Kids in cages.
When Clinton built the cages: SILENCE!!
When Obama put kids in cages: SILENCE!!
When Trump Became President: OMG KIDS IN CAGES!!! REEEEEEEE!!!
When Biden Became President: Silence once again!!!
I'm going to wager that when Trump becomes president again, the "Kids in Cages" whining will make it's return.
#
That's what I want anyways. Kill the Hamas and only the Hamas. I can't speak for all of Queers for Palestine. Though what few folks I did speak to seemed to share similar sentiments.
That's what I want anyways. Kill the Hamas and only the Hamas. I can't speak for all of Queers for Palestine. Though what few folks I did speak to seemed to share similar sentiments.
I think a hilarious point to all of the commenters here that are just "You support Trump?! I hate you, burn in hell!" don't realize a couple of things:
1. Why bother commenting or even following the artist when said artist's political leanings have been plainly stated in the past?
2. In making said comments, they don't realize that they're blatantly violating CoC articles that could lead to their accounts getting suspended/banned on grounds of harassment.
I originally came here for the art, but I think I'll stay for the salt. Plenty around here to put on my popcorn in any case. And in case someone wants to try hating on ME for being another Trump supporter, I am in no way whatsoever a Trump supporter; I just have better manners than to flame someone's page concerning their personal opinions. On that note, I can't say much for the Democrat side either. Kinda a drinking game watching anything with Biden though; if he gets lost on stage, take a shot, lol. "A good 'ole double barrel shotgun is all you need for home defense". Sure, okay. Fuckwit.
1. Why bother commenting or even following the artist when said artist's political leanings have been plainly stated in the past?
2. In making said comments, they don't realize that they're blatantly violating CoC articles that could lead to their accounts getting suspended/banned on grounds of harassment.
I originally came here for the art, but I think I'll stay for the salt. Plenty around here to put on my popcorn in any case. And in case someone wants to try hating on ME for being another Trump supporter, I am in no way whatsoever a Trump supporter; I just have better manners than to flame someone's page concerning their personal opinions. On that note, I can't say much for the Democrat side either. Kinda a drinking game watching anything with Biden though; if he gets lost on stage, take a shot, lol. "A good 'ole double barrel shotgun is all you need for home defense". Sure, okay. Fuckwit.
Right? I just find it silly that people could get so uppity over a picture of a hat on a furry porn character, or that all of the SexyFur girls would share the same political alignment. In any sort of believable fictional setting, it would stand to reason that different characters would have differing opinions.
https://www.furaffinity.net/view/52140460/ bro lol stones and glass houses
MAGA is a movement that leans towards authoritarianism and aims to ban pornography. It's kind of ironic since Bernal has built his career around it, right? I think this issue goes beyond just political disagreements. And who exactly is this image aimed at? Is there a specific MAGA group that gets off on furry porn?
I had my suspicions, but I didn't have any solid proof until now. Do you understand that modern conservatives hate porn and want to make it illegal? Imagine what would happen if Trump learned about your furry porn career. Do you really think he would give you a pass because you drew a character in a MAGA hat? I highly doubt it. You would be vilified by right-wing media. This image is extremely hypocritical, and honestly, it makes me want to erase all of your art from my furry art collection.
15 years later and your work hasn't gotten a lick better.
I mean, conservatives grifting their audience and milking them dry is a recurring theme on the right so I'm not surprised.
Sadly it still means you're grotesquely wealthy relative to your actual level of skill and decency.
I mean, conservatives grifting their audience and milking them dry is a recurring theme on the right so I'm not surprised.
Sadly it still means you're grotesquely wealthy relative to your actual level of skill and decency.
Comments