Originally completed 14th January 2022
Smash Bros. Remix was a thing. And so were a lot of things at the time-- can you identify them?
Smash Bros. Remix was a thing. And so were a lot of things at the time-- can you identify them?
Category Artwork (Digital) / Comics
Species Pokemon
Size 1043 x 3532px
File Size 5.07 MB
Listed in Folders
I fully agree. It's just that, by the same standard, I feel that many pages of your comic, currently marked "Mature", lack anything objectionable — nothing that would be considered deserving of a restrictive rating in a 1990s superhero comic book.
In fact, I was going to post on other comic pages questioning what was objectionable about them, until I realized this odd-man-out page being marked "General" might have been an oversight. A lot of mainstream comic books, even from 40 years ago employed spandex liberally, and would be in hot water if they got in trouble with the censors for "non-descript gender assigning bulges".
I understand it's up to each artist to personally judge whether to mark their content to more restricted audiences. So, now that I know you're going by the standard that any rated-PG gender bulge gets a "Mature" tag, I'll respect and leave it as that. Maybe it's a difference in understanding of standards between the states and the UK. You do you, man.
In fact, I was going to post on other comic pages questioning what was objectionable about them, until I realized this odd-man-out page being marked "General" might have been an oversight. A lot of mainstream comic books, even from 40 years ago employed spandex liberally, and would be in hot water if they got in trouble with the censors for "non-descript gender assigning bulges".
I understand it's up to each artist to personally judge whether to mark their content to more restricted audiences. So, now that I know you're going by the standard that any rated-PG gender bulge gets a "Mature" tag, I'll respect and leave it as that. Maybe it's a difference in understanding of standards between the states and the UK. You do you, man.
FA+

Comments