
Time to explain where the boy came from.
Category Artwork (Digital) / Comics
Species Robot / Android / Cyborg
Size 800 x 1200px
File Size 759.1 kB
Listed in Folders
Interesting question, naked can be defined as an unclothed body, but then you have to define what the body is. Let's take the cyborg Vero from the series, for example. If we only define her biological body as her body, it is only a nude scene when you see her brain,the only thing that is left of it, if you count her cyborg parts/bionics, than she is naked with or without her fake fur (her fake fur could also be counted as part of the body).
Yep, it was explained in chapter 1 - which is currently unavailable because the site's been down for days, for some reason. The Extinction was basically mutually assured destruction between two world superpowers. It will be explained again in this story, don't worry.
He is very cute, pettable even! The bright blue eyes help with that. However may I inquire why people believe nanotech is somesort of doomsday device? Would a lattice of nanorobotics not would be rather easy to dissasemble?
Would a nano-machine lattice not be substantially weaker than any conventional atomic or molecular bond? It would be great for rapid re-configuration but terrible for structural integrity me thinks.
As to how he spied on the conversation, he's made of nanotech you goobs, he can probably stretch a nano-filament of himself into the room through cracks and crevaces in the room. Actively electrifying the walls could probably prevent that as machines that small would have very little by way of defensive capability by their lonesome.
I give a lot of thought to randomness like this, nanotechnology would have very clearly defined limits I think! What I am more curious about is where he will fit in Esperanza's legal framework, I am disappointed however that he is not a genuine Artificial Intelligence, oh well. At least he actively discussed the primary issue involved with powerful augmented individuals, synthetics or Artificial Intelligence in general, the element of trust being... unprovable essentially. Very cool touch.
Would a nano-machine lattice not be substantially weaker than any conventional atomic or molecular bond? It would be great for rapid re-configuration but terrible for structural integrity me thinks.
As to how he spied on the conversation, he's made of nanotech you goobs, he can probably stretch a nano-filament of himself into the room through cracks and crevaces in the room. Actively electrifying the walls could probably prevent that as machines that small would have very little by way of defensive capability by their lonesome.
I give a lot of thought to randomness like this, nanotechnology would have very clearly defined limits I think! What I am more curious about is where he will fit in Esperanza's legal framework, I am disappointed however that he is not a genuine Artificial Intelligence, oh well. At least he actively discussed the primary issue involved with powerful augmented individuals, synthetics or Artificial Intelligence in general, the element of trust being... unprovable essentially. Very cool touch.
Thinking on "how he could hear them":
It's unlikely that they met physically with the subject whose name I don't immediately know (Lazarus?), but that doesn't deny second- or third- or (insert degrees of Kevin Bacon)-th degree contact transferring some form of nanobot sensor that operates on a faraday-bypassing methodology. (I doubt he compromised the faraday cage, as he's being cooperative.)
Alternately, there may be a secondary, disconnected body that has already hooked into the sensor networks and is using convenient cameras or microphones to listen in. He said nothing about seeing them, after all.
Or there could be some form of weird super-sensor he's using to see through everything in the way, all the way into their room, and read the sonic vibrations off the monitor.
I suspect that the camera isn't hacked, due to intentions of good behavior, so I doubt he's overriding the camera view with a simulation while standing just out-of-view for both them and us. (Even if it would be funny.)
It's unlikely that they met physically with the subject whose name I don't immediately know (Lazarus?), but that doesn't deny second- or third- or (insert degrees of Kevin Bacon)-th degree contact transferring some form of nanobot sensor that operates on a faraday-bypassing methodology. (I doubt he compromised the faraday cage, as he's being cooperative.)
Alternately, there may be a secondary, disconnected body that has already hooked into the sensor networks and is using convenient cameras or microphones to listen in. He said nothing about seeing them, after all.
Or there could be some form of weird super-sensor he's using to see through everything in the way, all the way into their room, and read the sonic vibrations off the monitor.
I suspect that the camera isn't hacked, due to intentions of good behavior, so I doubt he's overriding the camera view with a simulation while standing just out-of-view for both them and us. (Even if it would be funny.)
Comments