Does it count as blood for content warnings if its not red? is this like samurai jack rules where because its any color other than red it doesn't count for censorships?

i kinda wondered that too... like it is deffinetly blood but their blood isnt red. i do mature just in case but where is the line for it..

from https://www.furaffinity.net/aup, under general content guidelines right at the top it says "Minimal blood presented in a comedic manner or mild, non-violent injury is allowed." In that case i suppose it comes down to whether or not you see what's depicted as a 'non-violent injury', and given that its viewed at a distance and the injury is not currently happening, I think you could safely put this in the general category and not the mature category? But to the artist maybe I'd suggest just a "if it feels mature, call it mature" mindset just to stay on the safe side. For me I'd say this doesn't feel mature, but you might feel differently, and I think your opinion will be the most important one here. :P

ah i guess non violent would matter.. i've never had any issues with something being general.. but i also think that my non super detailed non realistic depiction of these things helps with being ok with general rating? though i think after reading that some of the more horror things could be mature not just because of blood. i do agree this one could proboly be fine as general.