
Concerto for Piano and Orchestra in F Sharp Minor - Mvt 1.2
In celebration of my 300th watcher, I am now posting the first movement of my Concerto for Piano and Orchestra in F Sharp Minor. This musical work is without compare my greatest musical composition in terms of scope, orchestration, technique, form, and thematic development. It began life in 1999 as my Piano Sonata in F Sharp Minor (http://www.furaffinity.net/view/4684333/) but within two years had turned into a full-fledged Romantic Era Piano Concerto.
Due to the length of the first movement and the size restrictions, I have to post the piece in two sections.
Concerto for Piano and Orchestra in F Sharp Minor - Movement I: Allegro giocoso
Part I - Theme A, A', Theme B (http://www.furaffinity.net/view/6347195/)
Part II - Development, Recapitulation (A, Cadenza, B), Coda
The music is based around a two note, four note, and six note theme. F# - G# / G# - A / B - C#. This theme and its subthemes are reversed and inverted throughout all four movements.
The first movement is in Concerto-Allegro form.
The Development section begins with a modified restatement of the opening theme, now coupled with disjointed entrances by piano, brass, and strings. Around 0:45 the strings and woodwinds lead a plaintive descending melody while the pianists plays chromatic scales that suggest the same melody. At 1:20 this peters out after a hint at the playful theme, where the brass and woodwinds hold a short conversation, punctated by the Glockenspiel. This builds into a long breathed crescendo which uses both theme A and theme B simultaenously overlapping. The piano rejoins at 2:35 to drive this crescendo back into a minor key which erupts into the Recapitulation.
The opening theme is heard now joined by piano and strings, blending both the original brass fanfare with the piano introduction. Tihs is followed by the somber meditation with the piano taking the part of the plucked strings. The playful section tries to assert itself, but it vanishes into the Cadenza.
The Cadenza starts at 5:05 and herein the pianist reprises the opening theme before diving into a full bore hammering out of the second theme with suggestions of a military march. A few pyrotechnics ensue before the pianist rushes with an arrpegio into the third variation of the second theme, joined by the full orchestral tutti now in F Sharp Minor. A quick transition ensues in which the pianist now plays chopped chords with both hands, until the piece resolves to A Major with the fourth evocation of theme B.
A brief brass fanfare suggests the closing of the first section at 7:50, building to a climax at 8:20 that thunders briefly before fading into alternating I - Ger6 chords with hints of the playful theme. At 9:09 the violins play the opening two note theme while the pianist very gently intones the rhythmic descending chords. The movement ends with a gentle A - B - B - C# from the piano and one last sigh from the strings and French Horns.
All together the first movement lasts 17:43 seconds.
The Orchestration:
2 Flutes
2 Oboes
2 Clarinets in A
2 Bassoons
4 French Horns
4 Trumpets in C
2 Trombones
1 Bass Trombone
1 Tuba
Tympani
Bass Drum
Harp
Celeste
Glockenspiel
Grand Piano
Violins I, II
Violas
Cellos
String Basses
Dominus vobiscum
Due to the length of the first movement and the size restrictions, I have to post the piece in two sections.
Concerto for Piano and Orchestra in F Sharp Minor - Movement I: Allegro giocoso
Part I - Theme A, A', Theme B (http://www.furaffinity.net/view/6347195/)
Part II - Development, Recapitulation (A, Cadenza, B), Coda
The music is based around a two note, four note, and six note theme. F# - G# / G# - A / B - C#. This theme and its subthemes are reversed and inverted throughout all four movements.
The first movement is in Concerto-Allegro form.
The Development section begins with a modified restatement of the opening theme, now coupled with disjointed entrances by piano, brass, and strings. Around 0:45 the strings and woodwinds lead a plaintive descending melody while the pianists plays chromatic scales that suggest the same melody. At 1:20 this peters out after a hint at the playful theme, where the brass and woodwinds hold a short conversation, punctated by the Glockenspiel. This builds into a long breathed crescendo which uses both theme A and theme B simultaenously overlapping. The piano rejoins at 2:35 to drive this crescendo back into a minor key which erupts into the Recapitulation.
The opening theme is heard now joined by piano and strings, blending both the original brass fanfare with the piano introduction. Tihs is followed by the somber meditation with the piano taking the part of the plucked strings. The playful section tries to assert itself, but it vanishes into the Cadenza.
The Cadenza starts at 5:05 and herein the pianist reprises the opening theme before diving into a full bore hammering out of the second theme with suggestions of a military march. A few pyrotechnics ensue before the pianist rushes with an arrpegio into the third variation of the second theme, joined by the full orchestral tutti now in F Sharp Minor. A quick transition ensues in which the pianist now plays chopped chords with both hands, until the piece resolves to A Major with the fourth evocation of theme B.
A brief brass fanfare suggests the closing of the first section at 7:50, building to a climax at 8:20 that thunders briefly before fading into alternating I - Ger6 chords with hints of the playful theme. At 9:09 the violins play the opening two note theme while the pianist very gently intones the rhythmic descending chords. The movement ends with a gentle A - B - B - C# from the piano and one last sigh from the strings and French Horns.
All together the first movement lasts 17:43 seconds.
The Orchestration:
2 Flutes
2 Oboes
2 Clarinets in A
2 Bassoons
4 French Horns
4 Trumpets in C
2 Trombones
1 Bass Trombone
1 Tuba
Tympani
Bass Drum
Harp
Celeste
Glockenspiel
Grand Piano
Violins I, II
Violas
Cellos
String Basses
Dominus vobiscum
Category Music / Classical
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 120 x 92px
File Size 9.17 MB
It's wonderful Charles! Downloaded the MP3! Will put it on my iPod when I find it, this half feels like it's trying to tell a story, though honestly I'm not sure what the story is about. But the way it's calm near the begining, so frantic in the middle, working up to a climax, then it goes down to a resolution and ends on a calming note. Just like a story! It really does feel like there's an audial story present here. Overall, this is very expertly done and I felt moved. Yes I speak of both parts.
I especially liked how the music itself felt almost like a Zelda game, it definitely has a flair of "fantasy" mixed with something, far more... refined and elegant, not quite sure what the word for it is.
My only regret, was that I did not listen sooner. Very well down, I really hope you're proud of this piece. I honestly think you're talented enough to make a career out of music if you wanted. My ears thank you for the sheer delight you have brought them.
I especially liked how the music itself felt almost like a Zelda game, it definitely has a flair of "fantasy" mixed with something, far more... refined and elegant, not quite sure what the word for it is.
My only regret, was that I did not listen sooner. Very well down, I really hope you're proud of this piece. I honestly think you're talented enough to make a career out of music if you wanted. My ears thank you for the sheer delight you have brought them.
One of the nice things about Concerto-Allegro form (which is what I used) is that it lends itself very well to a storytelling atmosphere. The music doesn't exist in a single emotional state like it typically does for pop songs or other popular media. The music builds and carries you through a vast landscape of ideas and emotions.
I never had enough drive or will to practice my craft with music as I would need to make a career out of it. If I can finish this Concerto, I think I'd be satisfied.
And do make sure you listen to both halves one after another to get the full effect!
Dominus tecum
I never had enough drive or will to practice my craft with music as I would need to make a career out of it. If I can finish this Concerto, I think I'd be satisfied.
And do make sure you listen to both halves one after another to get the full effect!
Dominus tecum
Glockenspiel FTW! I love when pieces employ rarely used instruments. And done in such a way as to complement, not detract. Although the piano takes center stage for much of the piece, there is a nice balance with the other instruments when it isn't the primary point of interest. Some of the piano sections had a feeling of a Liszt etude, but without the over-dramaticization. The section beginning at 7:30 has a very mystical presence.
Overall, a really nice piece of music, Matthias. I would love to hear a live performance of it with the intended instruments.
Overall, a really nice piece of music, Matthias. I would love to hear a live performance of it with the intended instruments.
Glockenspiel is one of the instruments I played in Band. The forces are pretty standard because I wasn't thinking too much in terms of the color that percussion can provide. The color palette that just the orchestra itself brings is immense as it is!
That section at 7:30 is really the emotional climax of this movement. I consider this piece in many ways a contrast between the dramatic almost Sturm und Drang of the first theme and the elevated, mystical beauty of the second theme.
The other three movements of the Concerto will feature this same dynamic in different ways. Now if I could just finish the last movement...
I do hope very much that you'll be able to hear this piece performed live one day. You are one of the first people I'd invite!
Dominus tecum
That section at 7:30 is really the emotional climax of this movement. I consider this piece in many ways a contrast between the dramatic almost Sturm und Drang of the first theme and the elevated, mystical beauty of the second theme.
The other three movements of the Concerto will feature this same dynamic in different ways. Now if I could just finish the last movement...
I do hope very much that you'll be able to hear this piece performed live one day. You are one of the first people I'd invite!
Dominus tecum
Hello good sir, fellow composer fur here. I thought I'd give this a listen since, you know, piano concertos and all.
Anyway, I actually quite liked it. I think the themes were fairly well-developed over the course of the thing, and while I personally would've preferred to see a little more harmonic exploration, I thought that the harmonies were actually quite interesting.
Have you managed to get it at least read live yet?
Anyway, I actually quite liked it. I think the themes were fairly well-developed over the course of the thing, and while I personally would've preferred to see a little more harmonic exploration, I thought that the harmonies were actually quite interesting.
Have you managed to get it at least read live yet?
Thank you very much for giving this a listen! It is hard to get people to really listen to music, especially classical music of the dimensions I prefer. So thank you!
I am glad you enjoyed it. I was aiming for a late 19th century feel for most of the work and its harmonic language. Most folks who listen think the harmony is fairly advanced, but I know I have some limitations I'm constantly exploring.
I so wish I could get this live read! Sadly, I have no affiliation with any orchestra of any quality and cannot play the piano line myself. All I have is my digital recording. And I still haven't finished the fourth movement, but I hope I'll be able to get back to that next year.
Thank you again for listening! The second movement (a scherzo) has also been posted. I'm very interested in hearing your thoughts on that movement too.
Dominus tecum
I am glad you enjoyed it. I was aiming for a late 19th century feel for most of the work and its harmonic language. Most folks who listen think the harmony is fairly advanced, but I know I have some limitations I'm constantly exploring.
I so wish I could get this live read! Sadly, I have no affiliation with any orchestra of any quality and cannot play the piano line myself. All I have is my digital recording. And I still haven't finished the fourth movement, but I hope I'll be able to get back to that next year.
Thank you again for listening! The second movement (a scherzo) has also been posted. I'm very interested in hearing your thoughts on that movement too.
Dominus tecum
Yeah, the classical music world is woefully unappreciated these days, it really is.
Well, most folks also haven't heard of guys like Boulez and Berio, so if they think this is advanced, they've got a lot to catch up with, LOL.
Hm... Yeah, with that you have to get lucky, I'm afraid, and it also comes with knowing the right people. I wrote a viola concerto once and managed to get a movement of it read live, actually. Didn't go perfectly, but then, that's the fun of live performance: anything can happen when it's done live.
And yeah, I don't tend to do well on piano either. What instrument do you play, if any?
And whoah, fourth movement? Careful, man, the length of the piece can sometimes affect how often it can be performed. I doubt you want to turn this into the next Busoni concerto, y'know?
Hm, the scherzo is up? I'll give that a listen in a bit, then.
Well, most folks also haven't heard of guys like Boulez and Berio, so if they think this is advanced, they've got a lot to catch up with, LOL.
Hm... Yeah, with that you have to get lucky, I'm afraid, and it also comes with knowing the right people. I wrote a viola concerto once and managed to get a movement of it read live, actually. Didn't go perfectly, but then, that's the fun of live performance: anything can happen when it's done live.
And yeah, I don't tend to do well on piano either. What instrument do you play, if any?
And whoah, fourth movement? Careful, man, the length of the piece can sometimes affect how often it can be performed. I doubt you want to turn this into the next Busoni concerto, y'know?
Hm, the scherzo is up? I'll give that a listen in a bit, then.
I have heard Boulez's second Piano Sonata and I confess it is just too atonal for me. Berio has written some great stuff though. His Sinfonia was quite enjoyable.
Awesome you have some of your Viola Concerto performed! I hope one day I can say the same about this work but if not I just hope I can finish it at least!
I play Piano but don't have enough time to practice to really get good. I also played Percussion but it's been a while since I was able to do so seriously.
*chuckles* I shall not be a threat to Busoni's length. I do know that this will be rather long and it will make it harder to perform. But I just have to write the music as it wants to be. Its size and scope please me.
Dominus tecum
Awesome you have some of your Viola Concerto performed! I hope one day I can say the same about this work but if not I just hope I can finish it at least!
I play Piano but don't have enough time to practice to really get good. I also played Percussion but it's been a while since I was able to do so seriously.
*chuckles* I shall not be a threat to Busoni's length. I do know that this will be rather long and it will make it harder to perform. But I just have to write the music as it wants to be. Its size and scope please me.
Dominus tecum
Well, I happen to like heavily atonal music, so Boulez suits me just fine. And Berio is awesome: I would kill to see a performance of Coro live.
Well, again, it was at a reading, so it wasn't a public performance as much as a rehearsal-type setting. But it was still cool. I actually got it read in the same reading as the last movement of the Symphony Fantastique, actually. And since that movement used the Dies Irae chant a lot... well, that was a bit sureal.
Yeah, I'm okay at piano at best. I can fish out chords and I'm an okay improviser on it... just don't put any sheet music in front of me or it turns into Epic Fail territory really fast.
Mm, fair enough about the length. As you were. *bows*
Well, again, it was at a reading, so it wasn't a public performance as much as a rehearsal-type setting. But it was still cool. I actually got it read in the same reading as the last movement of the Symphony Fantastique, actually. And since that movement used the Dies Irae chant a lot... well, that was a bit sureal.
Yeah, I'm okay at piano at best. I can fish out chords and I'm an okay improviser on it... just don't put any sheet music in front of me or it turns into Epic Fail territory really fast.
Mm, fair enough about the length. As you were. *bows*
Atonal is hit or miss for me. Some of it works really well and some just sounds like noise for me. Berg Violin Concerto is one of my favorites, and Webern's Variations for Orchestra is also quite excellent. I had Cornel Taranu's first four symphonies but I just couldn't make heads or tails of them.
Nevertheless, it is awesome that you got a reading. And funny you should mention the Dies Irae.
I'm not a good sight reader, but if I have time to practice I'm decent. I've managed some Bach, Beethoven, and Brahms as well as Scriabin, Rachmaninoff, Debussy, and Messiaen. I tried Barber's Piano Sonata and some Liszt but couldn't quite manage it at the time. I learned the first half of Dohnanyi's Passacaglia before my practice time got reduced to zero due to life. Now, as the father of a little girl I'm learning more Muppets than Mozart!
Dominus tecum
Nevertheless, it is awesome that you got a reading. And funny you should mention the Dies Irae.
I'm not a good sight reader, but if I have time to practice I'm decent. I've managed some Bach, Beethoven, and Brahms as well as Scriabin, Rachmaninoff, Debussy, and Messiaen. I tried Barber's Piano Sonata and some Liszt but couldn't quite manage it at the time. I learned the first half of Dohnanyi's Passacaglia before my practice time got reduced to zero due to life. Now, as the father of a little girl I'm learning more Muppets than Mozart!
Dominus tecum
Cornel Taranu, huh? Hm... There might be a reason we haven't heard of him, LOL. Frankly, with atonal music, you have to know what the hell you're doing. And Berg and Webern are both awesome: in case you can't tell from my username, I'm a total Berg fanboy myself.
Well, you can do better than I can. About the most advanced thing I was able to pull off was the Chopin funeral march, which I only learned because of department requirements at the school I went to. And then I can also plink out the chord progression from the opening of Tristan und Isolde. But yeah, dude, if you can manage even a little Messiaen, you're already miles ahead of me. (Seriously, I look at the score of Vingt Regards sur l'enfant-Jésus and I'm just like "how the hell is this possible!?". And I mean, he wrote stuff that wasn't as hard and virtuosic as that, but still...)
Well, you can do better than I can. About the most advanced thing I was able to pull off was the Chopin funeral march, which I only learned because of department requirements at the school I went to. And then I can also plink out the chord progression from the opening of Tristan und Isolde. But yeah, dude, if you can manage even a little Messiaen, you're already miles ahead of me. (Seriously, I look at the score of Vingt Regards sur l'enfant-Jésus and I'm just like "how the hell is this possible!?". And I mean, he wrote stuff that wasn't as hard and virtuosic as that, but still...)
LOL! Good call on that. And yes, i could tell about the Berg. It's been a while since I've heard Wozzeck. The Violin Concerto is undoubtedly my favorite piece of 12-tone music.
Ironically, the Messiaen I played was the first piece from Vingt Regards sur l'enfant-Jésus which compared to the rest of it is pretty straight forward (my reaction to the rest is similar to yours). I love the sixth vision though "For Whom All Things are Made". The thunderous chords toward the end always give me goosebumps!
At Anthrocon I met a fur named
clefwolf who belted out Liszt's transcription of Saint-Saens Danse Macabre on one of the hotel pianos. Now he was good! And while he did not care for atonal music, he far outstripped me in pianism and I'm not afraid to say it!
Dominus tecum
Ironically, the Messiaen I played was the first piece from Vingt Regards sur l'enfant-Jésus which compared to the rest of it is pretty straight forward (my reaction to the rest is similar to yours). I love the sixth vision though "For Whom All Things are Made". The thunderous chords toward the end always give me goosebumps!
At Anthrocon I met a fur named

Dominus tecum
I certainly consider the violin concerto to be one of the great concertos ever written. It's not my favorite Berg piece (there's an incredible kind of raw, unpredictable energy to his non-serial works that's somewhat tempered in the serial works, and it's to the very slight detriment of those pieces I feel), but it is still something special.
Vingt Regards... That piece gets downright crazy sometimes, LOL. But then again, it is a virtuoso piece, so it comes with the territory, it really does. (Fun story: I wrote a set of my own virtuosic piano pieces, and at least some of them were inspired by Vingt Regards in some way. I've also got that performed live once.)
Yeah, I started watching Clef just before he went off for Anthrocon. If he can do a Liszt transcription, then I don't doubt his pianistic abilities. I wonder if I could convince him to do a Ligeti etude... *rubs hands together*
Vingt Regards... That piece gets downright crazy sometimes, LOL. But then again, it is a virtuoso piece, so it comes with the territory, it really does. (Fun story: I wrote a set of my own virtuosic piano pieces, and at least some of them were inspired by Vingt Regards in some way. I've also got that performed live once.)
Yeah, I started watching Clef just before he went off for Anthrocon. If he can do a Liszt transcription, then I don't doubt his pianistic abilities. I wonder if I could convince him to do a Ligeti etude... *rubs hands together*
What Berg would you suggest then? I confess I don't know too much of his music.
Oh really? That's awesome! I'm very impressed to hear that! Composition seems sometimes to be the easy part! I know my own piano writing is somewhat lacking but I keep trying.
Well, given that he didn't seem too interested in Prokofiev you might have your work cut out for you there.
Dominus tecum
Oh really? That's awesome! I'm very impressed to hear that! Composition seems sometimes to be the easy part! I know my own piano writing is somewhat lacking but I keep trying.
Well, given that he didn't seem too interested in Prokofiev you might have your work cut out for you there.
Dominus tecum
Hm... Well, Wozzeck for sure... I also quite like the Drie Orchesterstücke and the Altenberglieder. The earlier stuff isn't that well known, but it's fun in its own right.
Yeah, composing it is the easy part. It's presenting your baby to the world that's the hard part, yeah?
Hm... Well, Ligeti is 20th Century in a very different way from Prokofiev, so I wouldn't count 'em out just yet. The 20th Century is a smorgasbord, especially once you get to the later part of it (which is Ligeti's domain).
Yeah, composing it is the easy part. It's presenting your baby to the world that's the hard part, yeah?
Hm... Well, Ligeti is 20th Century in a very different way from Prokofiev, so I wouldn't count 'em out just yet. The 20th Century is a smorgasbord, especially once you get to the later part of it (which is Ligeti's domain).
It has been some time (not since college) that I heard Wozzeck. I was not willing to give serial music much chance back then. I will have to check out all your recommendations (at least if any are on Youtube).
Well, composing is not that easy either, but it is easier!
The 20th century definitely has a ton of variety. It has Boulez and Bowen, Sorabji and Shostakovich, Prokofiev and Poulenc, Copland and Cowell, Hanson and Henze, Ligeti and Lauridsen, amongst so many others!
Dominus tecum
Well, composing is not that easy either, but it is easier!
The 20th century definitely has a ton of variety. It has Boulez and Bowen, Sorabji and Shostakovich, Prokofiev and Poulenc, Copland and Cowell, Hanson and Henze, Ligeti and Lauridsen, amongst so many others!
Dominus tecum
Really? Huh... I'll admit PIerrot Lunaire probably isn't the best intro to non-tonal music (personally, I would've introduced you to the Opus 16 orchestra pieces first since they're quite a bit more accessible), but I really loved that on my first listen, so... I guess to each their own?
Oh, there are some I like now, but I just remember my music history class going on about how important a work Pierrot Lunaire was for atonal music so it was easy to get the impression that it was typical of the genre. Not that I didn't like some of Schoenberg's music (Verklarte Nacht and Chamber Symphony No. 1 were favorites of mine from the first hearing) but it was generally his early tonal or semi-tonal stuff. It took me a while before I developed a liking for his Piano Concerto, for instance.
But aye, to each his own. I find the Late Romantic and Contemporary styles more appealing than the rigorous atonal works. Which is why my Concerto reflects my Romantic Era tastes.
Dominus tecum
But aye, to each his own. I find the Late Romantic and Contemporary styles more appealing than the rigorous atonal works. Which is why my Concerto reflects my Romantic Era tastes.
Dominus tecum
Comments