Against. They're not actual artists. End of discussion.

I totally agree to that!

Fully against. Not a fan of wasting resources for the sake of generating something for the sake of "making art more accessible". That sentiment is, in my opinion, a crock of shit, as there have been plenty of artists that overcame their disabilities for the love of creating things themselves.

Thanks for your answers, I'm not a big fan too, to my opinion is a stealing of the works by real artists 😥 But I like to hear the opinions of others too ^^

I'm against AI "artists". As someone who experimented with it when it first came out (and after learning more about it, stopped), I get that it's nice to have the image in your head appear with little to no effort put in (aside from writing a prompt). However. I think our global resources could be put to better use, and I think there is inherent worth in developing a skillset. That said, I also do not believe they are artists just because they asked a machine to generate an image based on a prompt. I have seen it likened to someone commissioning an artist to make a piece and claiming they made it. I would agree, based on that description, then, that there are no AI artists. I hope this helps!

I'm totally agreeing with you. To my opinion, it's not a real artists... Everyone with a good vocabulary can create everything with AI... I know it's not someone who's able to create something or having the cash for, but still, AI will never replace a real artist works...

I will forever be against them. It is said that the best writers learn by copying others, but the ai "artists" don't even do that. There is zero effort in their "work" past re-entering the exact same text over and over again until they get what they want. They gain nothing from the process, damage the environment more, and the end result is just ground-up plagiarism.

Exact... and with the time it will be worse and worse...