FA+
Shop
836 submissions
Since this year marks the 10th anniversary of the Ratchet and clank movie, here’s how I think it would’ve gone better.
1: Instead of a bland fanboy, portray ratchet as he was in the first game. Sarcastic, selfish, streetwise, so he can learn from his mistakes and get better character development later on.
2: Give clank more screen time and focus more on his and ratchet’s developing friendship.
3: Remove nefarious and keep drek as the main villain.
4: more action scenes with more use of ratchet’s weapons.
5: if you’re gonna include the galactic rangers, have them be the ones from UYA. (But should they keep Cora, at least have her do more)
6: more characters from the first game like helga and big al.
7: Have the movie be made by Sony pictures animation instead of rainmaker studios.
8: give the movie the same edgy and raunchy humor from the PS2 games, thus changing the rating to PG-13.
I also believe in this theory that the movie is an in-universe production. The script was co-written by qwark, hence why everything is so different from the first game. The galactic rangers were made up and were actually actors, He assumed that ratchet and clank were friends from the beginning when that wasn’t true, and he made up the whole thing where drek and nefarious knew each other and worked together when in reality nefarious probably never even knew who drek was.
As for why ratchet and clank would willingly sign on to star in a movie that got their first meeting and heroic feats wrong, they either begrudgingly did it because they needed the bolts or there’s actually an alternate directors’ cut of the movie that’s more faithful to the story and tone of the first game. Unfortunately the qwark cut was the first to release and the true director’s cut wouldn’t release until one month later. Ratchet was embarrassed that he was portrayed as a bland dreamer fanboy in the qwark cut, but when the real director’s cut was released, he felt relieved. He and clank didn’t want to be remembered as how they were portrayed in the first cut.
When the real nefarious saw the movie, he was mad that they used the likeness of both his former organic and current robotic forms without his consent. But fortunately they sent him part of the royalties earned after the movie’s release. That calmed him down enough to not go out and try to destroy the planet again.
1: Instead of a bland fanboy, portray ratchet as he was in the first game. Sarcastic, selfish, streetwise, so he can learn from his mistakes and get better character development later on.
2: Give clank more screen time and focus more on his and ratchet’s developing friendship.
3: Remove nefarious and keep drek as the main villain.
4: more action scenes with more use of ratchet’s weapons.
5: if you’re gonna include the galactic rangers, have them be the ones from UYA. (But should they keep Cora, at least have her do more)
6: more characters from the first game like helga and big al.
7: Have the movie be made by Sony pictures animation instead of rainmaker studios.
8: give the movie the same edgy and raunchy humor from the PS2 games, thus changing the rating to PG-13.
I also believe in this theory that the movie is an in-universe production. The script was co-written by qwark, hence why everything is so different from the first game. The galactic rangers were made up and were actually actors, He assumed that ratchet and clank were friends from the beginning when that wasn’t true, and he made up the whole thing where drek and nefarious knew each other and worked together when in reality nefarious probably never even knew who drek was.
As for why ratchet and clank would willingly sign on to star in a movie that got their first meeting and heroic feats wrong, they either begrudgingly did it because they needed the bolts or there’s actually an alternate directors’ cut of the movie that’s more faithful to the story and tone of the first game. Unfortunately the qwark cut was the first to release and the true director’s cut wouldn’t release until one month later. Ratchet was embarrassed that he was portrayed as a bland dreamer fanboy in the qwark cut, but when the real director’s cut was released, he felt relieved. He and clank didn’t want to be remembered as how they were portrayed in the first cut.
When the real nefarious saw the movie, he was mad that they used the likeness of both his former organic and current robotic forms without his consent. But fortunately they sent him part of the royalties earned after the movie’s release. That calmed him down enough to not go out and try to destroy the planet again.
Category Artwork (Digital) / Fanart
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1221 x 1096px
File Size 289.6 kB
Comments