dawwwww :3!

Isn't that usually cause for concern, when you don't know who your baby daddy is?

idk ^^;;

I think that perhaps stating she doesn't know who has fathered her child is silly. It's unnecessary information, and it really only proves to make her seem like a bit of a floozy, when in reality she might not be.

The overall image is cute, and very endearing. I merely believe that little statement takes that endearment out by replacing it with "Oh she's slutty".

do you see the same consern in nature? i believe that this is an animal.

Which would be relevant if the subjects of the piece were portrayed as simple animals, but alas, they are not.

You may be right in the fact that they are more a human as a an animal, may I ask: is it customary for people to always know who the father is of their child?if that is true then she violate the rules of your kind, than she may be not capable of raising a child by her own.

That seems like a dumb question- yes, it is customary: many women would want to know who fathered their children.

I don't want to get into the whole, "I'm not a human in spirit" debate, but strictly speaking, my 'kind' is your kind. Unless you happen to be a man, then in which case, maybe not so much.

Despite not knowing her who sired her child, it doesn't mean she's any less capable of raising a child. It's only a mildly questionable fact that perhaps could have been left out of the over-all description of the girl.

my name is Thor high commander of the Asgard. i am indeed not one of your kind.but if you say so I believe your word.

Its completely irrelevant whether or not she knows who the father is because she's a fictional character. Yes, most women would want to know who the father of their child is, but its not unheard of for some to be unconcerned.

awww...<3

Cute pic anyways.

cute ty...very cute