156 submissions
This started with
yourwhitecat doing an experiment of re-shooting an image displayed on a CRT screen for effect.
So now I'm playing around with this picture in photoshop in an effort to come up with a way to semi-convincingly fake the TV look.
Some of these effects used:
Abberations: http://www.3drender.com/light/lens.htm
VHS: http://abduzeedo.com/reader-tutoria.....-80s-vhs-style
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FB8whz9rRDw
Exposure: http://ebin.wordpress.com/2007/03/2.....ing-photoshop/
Colors: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAU8sdOHih8&feature=related
Scanlines: http://www.photoshopsupport.com/tut.....photoshop.html
http://www.photoshoplab.com/too-clo.....o-your-tv.html
http://www.photoshopbox.com/photo-e.....blurry-tv.html
+ lowering gamma with a vignette mask
+ some noise and slight lens blur on some layers
+ a fake trinitron grid
+ two overlay layers of 200% noise with Box Blur @ radius 1 and 2
+ JPEG compression at 21/100
yourwhitecat doing an experiment of re-shooting an image displayed on a CRT screen for effect.So now I'm playing around with this picture in photoshop in an effort to come up with a way to semi-convincingly fake the TV look.
Some of these effects used:
Abberations: http://www.3drender.com/light/lens.htm
VHS: http://abduzeedo.com/reader-tutoria.....-80s-vhs-style
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FB8whz9rRDw
Exposure: http://ebin.wordpress.com/2007/03/2.....ing-photoshop/
Colors: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAU8sdOHih8&feature=related
Scanlines: http://www.photoshopsupport.com/tut.....photoshop.html
http://www.photoshoplab.com/too-clo.....o-your-tv.html
http://www.photoshopbox.com/photo-e.....blurry-tv.html
+ lowering gamma with a vignette mask
+ some noise and slight lens blur on some layers
+ a fake trinitron grid
+ two overlay layers of 200% noise with Box Blur @ radius 1 and 2
+ JPEG compression at 21/100
Category All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1117 x 785px
File Size 69.5 kB
no semi about it, this is super convincing! im envious, I've always wanted to try that but im not particularly photoshop savvy. i remember when I was a kid, I used to sit way too close to this little tv we had in our kitchen to the point I could see the individual pixels. i was fascinated by how it worked. just a bunched of colored dots! and the fact that it was only three colors blew my mind at that tender age lol
Thank you, very much. :>
Oh, I remember I did that too. It was bloody fascinating! :)
There are a few details I'm not very happy about, but it sort of works. I'll try to develop it a bit further and maybe make it into a loooooong action. Also, I added some tutorials in the description.
Oh, I remember I did that too. It was bloody fascinating! :)
There are a few details I'm not very happy about, but it sort of works. I'll try to develop it a bit further and maybe make it into a loooooong action. Also, I added some tutorials in the description.
very much reminds me of the music of oneohtrix point never. try it.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/mus.....-never-replica
http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/mus.....-never-replica
Oh yeah, I did something like this a while back, but with just the specular reflections (the particularly bright ones that are reflecting sunlight) and it looked a bit like a digital camera took the photo.
Regardless, I'm a big fan of the experimentation involved and it really turned out nicely. Thanks for explaining it too. :)
Regardless, I'm a big fan of the experimentation involved and it really turned out nicely. Thanks for explaining it too. :)
Just to make it clear, when I said "I'm a big fan of the experimentation involved and it really turned out nicely" I was referring to yours. What I did was just a fun little experiment :P
As for my own experiment I was just messing around with an illustration I was working on. It was seriously simple compared to what you've done.
I took the really sharp specular highlights (like, the specular reflection of the sun that you would find on a wet or metallic surface) and duplicated them twice. I made one of them cyan and the other red. I separated them diagonally with the white specular inbetween, kind of like how you have the red/blue separation in your picture. It's more noticeable in outdoor digital photos of course, lol, but yeah. An effect like that on a really finely rendered piece could produce some cool results. For example, the whole TV effect caused me to actually think that your picture was an acrylic/oil painting that you photographed, lol :()
As for my own experiment I was just messing around with an illustration I was working on. It was seriously simple compared to what you've done.
I took the really sharp specular highlights (like, the specular reflection of the sun that you would find on a wet or metallic surface) and duplicated them twice. I made one of them cyan and the other red. I separated them diagonally with the white specular inbetween, kind of like how you have the red/blue separation in your picture. It's more noticeable in outdoor digital photos of course, lol, but yeah. An effect like that on a really finely rendered piece could produce some cool results. For example, the whole TV effect caused me to actually think that your picture was an acrylic/oil painting that you photographed, lol :()
Ah, the color shift. That's a lovely retro effect, especially when switched to CMYK, moved the channels a bit and then back to rgb - looks like misregistering in print. :)
The first tutorial has a nice macro for making the lense abberation effect in case you need to fake it again. It involves basically spherizing slightly every channel - red least, blue most. It's a bit more accurate than a separation, because you should get the opposite abberations on opposite sides of the lense, not a shift the same direction throughout the whole image. I remember A few years back the abberation thing puzzled me to no end.
I still can't figure out how exactly the slight color shift in a VHS recording works. You sort of see a more saturated edge on one side and a less saturated one on the other. But I can't figure out what is happening exactly.
The first tutorial has a nice macro for making the lense abberation effect in case you need to fake it again. It involves basically spherizing slightly every channel - red least, blue most. It's a bit more accurate than a separation, because you should get the opposite abberations on opposite sides of the lense, not a shift the same direction throughout the whole image. I remember A few years back the abberation thing puzzled me to no end.
I still can't figure out how exactly the slight color shift in a VHS recording works. You sort of see a more saturated edge on one side and a less saturated one on the other. But I can't figure out what is happening exactly.
I admire your thoroughness. Your dedication to chasing the concept down to the finest point--that marks the line between the dabblers and the dedicated--it puts you in a pretty small segment of the population. (Which is a good place to be. That's where the best work comes from anyway.)
Wow, thank you. Now you're certainly trying to spoil me with compliments. :>
Ah, if only I had the patience... I'd prolly work on one image all my life.
But doubts set in and I drop stuff that instant. Sometimes I drop entire activities because of a dissapointment. I'm not sure if that's considered good dedication. :]
Ah, if only I had the patience... I'd prolly work on one image all my life.
But doubts set in and I drop stuff that instant. Sometimes I drop entire activities because of a dissapointment. I'm not sure if that's considered good dedication. :]
I think it depends on where you have your focus. Ditching something because it isn't working--that's not a bad thing, at least not to me. My tendency is to wrestle with a piece until I get the bastard pinned on the mat. Stubbornness runs deep in my family. The bad side to that is failing to quit and start over when that's the best solution. I think I spent more time in the Land of Dead Paintings because of that stubbornness.
I guess my point would be this: your habits can only be called "bad" if they lead you away from The Mission: honing and maintaining your skills as an artist. What you suggest is hasty behavior sounds to me like decisiveness. Being decisive isn't a bad thing at all.
Nor are compliments, when they've been earned--and you earn more with every post. :)
I guess my point would be this: your habits can only be called "bad" if they lead you away from The Mission: honing and maintaining your skills as an artist. What you suggest is hasty behavior sounds to me like decisiveness. Being decisive isn't a bad thing at all.
Nor are compliments, when they've been earned--and you earn more with every post. :)
FA+

Comments