Something I made on DA-muro. for some reason, when I upload it, the color is inverted. That's not so bad, it's a little bit cooler this way.
Category All / General Furry Art
Species Squirrel
Size 450 x 340px
File Size 72.9 kB
Its a bout whose trampier? Then by that logic would sally still be a tramp?
I don't think it matters whose trampier if both are tramps. And besides, how do you know Sallys design isn't meant to be sexually provocative? Do you know the intention of the artist who drew her?
Just trying to see the logic in this.
I don't think it matters whose trampier if both are tramps. And besides, how do you know Sallys design isn't meant to be sexually provocative? Do you know the intention of the artist who drew her?
Just trying to see the logic in this.
I can't actually say what her designer had in mind for her, but comparing them, one was obviously intended to have a more sultry appearance.
There really isn't much logic to this. I made this as a jab to anti-Sally ppl. who trash her for being"nude" while having no problem with a cos-playing escort girl.
There really isn't much logic to this. I made this as a jab to anti-Sally ppl. who trash her for being"nude" while having no problem with a cos-playing escort girl.
You can be nude but not naked. It is actually a legal thing, in some states your not allowed to have naked dancers, if you put socks on them, they are no longer considered naked, just nude dancers. As long as they are wearing one article of clothing, they are not considered naked. But, in this term, she might be nude, but is exposing nothing, making a difference between naked and nude.
Humans tend to think alot of things that are simply wrong, especially things that are contradictory. They also tend to make alot of stupid laws as a result of it.
For example, in Baltimore, Maryland it is illegal to take a lion to the movies.
I like to think it is part of humanities ignorance and arrogance(Which, as I checked to make sure, are two different things).
For example, in Baltimore, Maryland it is illegal to take a lion to the movies.
I like to think it is part of humanities ignorance and arrogance(Which, as I checked to make sure, are two different things).
Its not a law the nation follows, and to be honest, there are only a small handful of people who could afford to obtain a lion, save maybe for those that work at a zoo, and it should go without saying you should not be taking a wild animal out of captivity(Or its natural environment.
Its still a silly law considering the circumstances.
But my point still stands, nude and naked is the same thing.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/naked
Its still a silly law considering the circumstances.
But my point still stands, nude and naked is the same thing.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/naked
FA+

Comments