i now that this is not fur but i am going to post it anyway. here is my car after i removed the police decals. like always comment and tell me what you think
Category All / Miscellaneous
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1280 x 589px
File Size 231.5 kB
well the huge truck thing this year was started by Toyota when the came out with their huge truck and then every other car company tried to do the same thing. yeah people have said that my car is to big, but i like it i can throw all my friends and stuff in my car and go do something
-alex
-alex
Sorry, I realize now you were ragging on those who have V8s and don't use them for anything.
Anyway, I'm done with big cars for now. I like them, but a year ago I bought a 1958 Volvo Amazon, which is a good four feet shorter than your car, and I haven't looked back. It's got a 140 sixteen-valve straight-four pulled from a 1985 Volvo 142, which gets 150 horsepower and 45 miles per gallon in the city and nearly 60 on the highway.
I can still squeeze six people in there but it's a tight fit in the front.
And I've been thinking about a 1960 Studebaker Lark as a second car, there's one for sale at the gas station. That one has a V8.
Anyway, I'm done with big cars for now. I like them, but a year ago I bought a 1958 Volvo Amazon, which is a good four feet shorter than your car, and I haven't looked back. It's got a 140 sixteen-valve straight-four pulled from a 1985 Volvo 142, which gets 150 horsepower and 45 miles per gallon in the city and nearly 60 on the highway.
I can still squeeze six people in there but it's a tight fit in the front.
And I've been thinking about a 1960 Studebaker Lark as a second car, there's one for sale at the gas station. That one has a V8.
26 miles per gallon ain't bad for 275 horsepower. You know, I've been wondering. Is it just me or have we made like no advancements in gas mileage in the last fifty or sixty years? I mean, my 1960 Impala got just about the same mileage as your 1995 Caprice. I was getting 28 highway and 25 city, it probably got got more when it was in better condition. Not a lot of improvement for 45 years. Hell, even econoboxes never showed much improvement. The Porsche VDK got 75 miles per gallon in 1939, appreciably that's with a 70 horsepower engine, but still. My friend Mama Chroma has a 1939 Ford Deluxe eight-passenger sedan, thing's bigger than a modern Lincoln Navigator and it gets 22 miles per gallon highway. And that's with a flathead. And Mama Chroma weighs a ton.
yeah i now what you mean and i really don't now how much more mpg we can get out of a gas engine, have you seen the hydrogen power cars i think that is going to be the next big thing and of course there are hybrid cars but they just are not as user friendly. but i think it will take a while to get people to drive hybrid 4 cylinders but i don't know.
-alex
-alex
Frankly, I want an electric car. Me uncle used to do electric conversions, his masterpiece was a 1961 Lincoln Continental in which he installed two pairs of 40 horsepower electric engines, which was 160 horsepower altogether. Its top speed was 90 miles per hour, it could go 200 miles before it needed a recharge, and the battery wouldn't need to be replaced for three years. No transmission required, no clutch necessary, four wheel drive with no differentials, started instantly, and it didn't vibrate.
Unfortunately, the efficiency of an electric car depends on where you charge it. Here the electricity comes from hydroelectric dams, but some places still burn coal.
Unfortunately, the efficiency of an electric car depends on where you charge it. Here the electricity comes from hydroelectric dams, but some places still burn coal.
The only reason they didn't catch on is viturally no one had electricity in the nineteen-aughts. This is another case in which I wonder why we haven't improved on things. Batteries don't last any longer now than they did seventy years ago. The electric motor has become ten times as efficient in that time.
Here's a random piece of sales literature.
http://www.tocmp.com/pix/D/images/1.....itElectric.jpg
But for the time being I have my Volvo. Say, I wonder how far I'd get in a race with you. I've got half the horsepower you do but my car's also half the weight. I've never drag raced before, though.
Here's a random piece of sales literature.
http://www.tocmp.com/pix/D/images/1.....itElectric.jpg
But for the time being I have my Volvo. Say, I wonder how far I'd get in a race with you. I've got half the horsepower you do but my car's also half the weight. I've never drag raced before, though.
i know what you mean about how batteries haven't improved any. i use to build robots and stuff like that and finding a good enough battery was always the problem.
well i now that your car would get me of the line but i think it would be really close. today i gained 8 more horse power in my car so its getting faster. i don't know how you have never dragged raced before i have never done drag race at like a drag strip but i have done it on the street and i am hooked.
-alex
well i now that your car would get me of the line but i think it would be really close. today i gained 8 more horse power in my car so its getting faster. i don't know how you have never dragged raced before i have never done drag race at like a drag strip but i have done it on the street and i am hooked.
-alex
I don't think there's much of street racing scene around here, in fact I've seen neither hide nor hair of one. My car ain't built for it, anyway. Even if it's got the speed for it if I made a habit of drag racing it'd fall apart. I think it'd take a bit of work to turn a half-century-old Swedish car with a quarter-century-old Swedish engine into a real street machine.
FA+

Comments