
Making a living as I do in the publishing industry, I’ve learned the ins and outs of such things as CMYK versus RGB, bleeds, trim sizes, spine thicknesses . . . and resolution. Every now and then I have to deal with someone who has learned none of these things, yet still attempts to work with them, resulting in unfortunately predictable disaster. So, just to make it crystal-clear—uh, sorry, couldn’t resist—here’s a detail of “Tomorrow’s Girls”. The left half is at 300 dpi resolution; the right half is at 72 dpi resolution. The former is print-quality; the latter is most emphatically not and is in fact suitable only for viewing on a monitor.
So, if you’re ever faced with the same problem, you can refer folks to this image, which is, I hope, worth the thousand words of explanation you otherwise would have to use—possibly without success.
So, if you’re ever faced with the same problem, you can refer folks to this image, which is, I hope, worth the thousand words of explanation you otherwise would have to use—possibly without success.
Category All / All
Species Vulpine (Other)
Size 900 x 1200px
File Size 343.6 kB
Listed in Folders
Yeah, that’s true. And I even confuse the issue by talking about “dpi” and “ppi” as if they’re synonymous, and they aren’t. Old habits die hard; I’m of the last pre-desktop-computer generation and learned “dpi”. For the record, ol’ Baron’s right: I should be using “pixels per inch”, not “dots per inch”.
Comments