5m section of an A340 modified to sit chakats in three layouts.
Left is a conventional 3+3 layout and houses 3.6 chakats per meter. Seth Triggs drew this layout over here.
Middle is a 'standing room only' option. Extremely passenger dense and capable of 7.2 chakats per meter, which is almost as much as human based layouts.
Right is a staggered stacking layout. The pawhands of the chakat on the upper 'seat' can touch the back rest of the chakat below and in front of hir. It manages 6.4 chakats per meter, only only by having a second level where you'd normally find a cargo deck. Justified here because chakats don't take nearly as many clothes on holiday, and rapid-prototyping should be able to produce many things we'd have to take with us today. Each chakat also has twice as much cabin bagage space as we do today.
Left is a conventional 3+3 layout and houses 3.6 chakats per meter. Seth Triggs drew this layout over here.
Middle is a 'standing room only' option. Extremely passenger dense and capable of 7.2 chakats per meter, which is almost as much as human based layouts.
Right is a staggered stacking layout. The pawhands of the chakat on the upper 'seat' can touch the back rest of the chakat below and in front of hir. It manages 6.4 chakats per meter, only only by having a second level where you'd normally find a cargo deck. Justified here because chakats don't take nearly as many clothes on holiday, and rapid-prototyping should be able to produce many things we'd have to take with us today. Each chakat also has twice as much cabin bagage space as we do today.
Category Artwork (Digital) / Miscellaneous
Species Feline (Other)
Size 960 x 540px
File Size 64.2 kB
Any information? I was under the impression that it was an relatively new and untested idea.
And I stand on the underground all the time (~~Maybe it's because I'm a Londoner~~) and I don't have any problems. Modern passenger jets don't accelerate harder than trains or buses do, in either direction.
And I stand on the underground all the time (~~Maybe it's because I'm a Londoner~~) and I don't have any problems. Modern passenger jets don't accelerate harder than trains or buses do, in either direction.
you forget about Pitch Yaw and Roll that you have in an aircraft. And many things can cause changes in them quickly. I remember seeing drawings of a plane set up like a subway car from back in the late 30s. It was designed for short hops like 20 to 30 mins.
You may be standing on the underground and everything is fine... But what happens when the train does an E-stop and pulls .3 to .6 Gs sideways with the train slowing down... or hits something that doesn't give? Now we are talking 2 to4 Gs real quick.
You may be standing on the underground and everything is fine... But what happens when the train does an E-stop and pulls .3 to .6 Gs sideways with the train slowing down... or hits something that doesn't give? Now we are talking 2 to4 Gs real quick.
You're getting into Troll/Spam territory here.
Strawman arguement. Commercial aircraft don't do this because it would throw everything about inside the passenger area, including private property, messy food, and hot drinks. It would also damage the structure of the $300M aircraft. Pilots are trained to bank low and slow and put all additional force through the floor; so it's just like standing in an elevator.
Stupid idiot arguement: Commercial aircraft can't pull e-stops, and there's nothing they can hit at 50,000+ that won't be an insta-kill anyway.
Finally I didn't draw any seats at all in the above pictures. I assumed most would realise that the left group have mats and headrests, the right group would not simply be floating mid air, and the middle group would be in literal stalls up to their waist height. Modern SRO do not look anything like subway trains. Something you could have googled out before making up idiot reasons why they wouldn't work.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art.....se-toilet.html
Strawman arguement. Commercial aircraft don't do this because it would throw everything about inside the passenger area, including private property, messy food, and hot drinks. It would also damage the structure of the $300M aircraft. Pilots are trained to bank low and slow and put all additional force through the floor; so it's just like standing in an elevator.
Stupid idiot arguement: Commercial aircraft can't pull e-stops, and there's nothing they can hit at 50,000+ that won't be an insta-kill anyway.
Finally I didn't draw any seats at all in the above pictures. I assumed most would realise that the left group have mats and headrests, the right group would not simply be floating mid air, and the middle group would be in literal stalls up to their waist height. Modern SRO do not look anything like subway trains. Something you could have googled out before making up idiot reasons why they wouldn't work.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art.....se-toilet.html
FA+


Comments