
What? No dragon??
Well.. not yet.
This was me experimenting with scenery.. Iz learnin' and stuff....
All done on one layer EXCEPT, of course the reflection...
I think if I were to do this again, it would take about half as long, as it searved its purpose, to learn. Also.. the stand of trees on the left isnt properly in perspective.. the nearby ones should be larger :P
I'll fix it before using it.
It still looks too cartoony .. and i am prettu sure mostly that is due to lack of reduced contrast/addition of haze in the bacground.. a color pallet that is perhaps to rich..
There are also clearly 3 different types of mountains in the image, where i experimented...
Well.. not yet.
This was me experimenting with scenery.. Iz learnin' and stuff....
All done on one layer EXCEPT, of course the reflection...
I think if I were to do this again, it would take about half as long, as it searved its purpose, to learn. Also.. the stand of trees on the left isnt properly in perspective.. the nearby ones should be larger :P
I'll fix it before using it.
It still looks too cartoony .. and i am prettu sure mostly that is due to lack of reduced contrast/addition of haze in the bacground.. a color pallet that is perhaps to rich..
There are also clearly 3 different types of mountains in the image, where i experimented...
Category All / Scenery
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1200 x 675px
File Size 175.8 kB
trains, houses, boats, people (dragons, fuzzies, what have you). wonderful mountain tops better then i can do. aluvial fans would look more convincing less vertical. also trees need more variation/diversity. as for color pallet, my own thought is not a matter of too rich, but rather insufficiently diverse. especially for parts you want to have look closer. where it blues out with distance, yes of course there it would want to be less saturated. (as spoken by someone who couldn't give you a decent example to save himself, but thus i observe, or think i do.)
Comments