
Her is a fursuit we just finished up for Halloween.
The photo shoot was not so great. i am still getting moved into my new house, and we have not yet found the "sweet spot" for good exposure in the house. So, this was the best I could get out of the photo shoot we had. Did not help that my model had to run to work. Oh well, Looks okay, but it looks so much better in person.
Anyway.. Great Dane,
The photo shoot was not so great. i am still getting moved into my new house, and we have not yet found the "sweet spot" for good exposure in the house. So, this was the best I could get out of the photo shoot we had. Did not help that my model had to run to work. Oh well, Looks okay, but it looks so much better in person.
Anyway.. Great Dane,
Category All / Portraits
Species Dog (Other)
Size 1280 x 800px
File Size 162.5 kB
HAHA, yeah, I thought that was funny too. The model is much too short, and the shadow that happened right there was completely accidental, and has more to do with fit than pattern. I was wondering if anyone noticed. The bad news is, it will no longer exist on the actual owner of the suit.
I often find myself in this situation when making commissioned suits. It can be rather unfortunate on my end because I am subject to criticism about my skill set, when I may actually agree with part, or whole of the observation. Furthermore, I almost certainly have the technical, and artistic prowess to pull of a more widely accepted look.
The funny thing is the commissioner expressed that he wanted somewhat subdued jowls. So, it's really up to the commissioner how much we get into the public's perception of a specific look, or nuance. This was particularly evident in exactly what you pointed out. Had I made the suit without any input at all, the suit would have looked very different. However, that is how it goes when working for commission. You don't necessarily have any duty to a look even something more widely accepted as character trait outside of your commissioners vision.
So, it is possible to do what you described, absolutely, but it is not always asked for.
The funny thing is the commissioner expressed that he wanted somewhat subdued jowls. So, it's really up to the commissioner how much we get into the public's perception of a specific look, or nuance. This was particularly evident in exactly what you pointed out. Had I made the suit without any input at all, the suit would have looked very different. However, that is how it goes when working for commission. You don't necessarily have any duty to a look even something more widely accepted as character trait outside of your commissioners vision.
So, it is possible to do what you described, absolutely, but it is not always asked for.
Comments