FA+
Shop
301
Views
Views
9
Favorites
Favorites
Category
All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1280 x 695
File Size 58.6 kB
Report this content
More from mythril_blackpaw
a heavy revolver that uses four .600 calibre rounds normally used in the main battle rifle of the cogfoxes, the Heavy Carbine
the cylinder is rotated by a gas mechanism akin the that of the rikhter R-23 but without the shell ejection part
all the rounds are kept in a full moon type clip that holds all the rounds in place for loading and unloaded
the break is kept close by a latch that makes up the rear sights and operates an internal system that when it unlatches unlocks the hinge and when latched it locks the hinge for added security
the cylinder is rotated by a gas mechanism akin the that of the rikhter R-23 but without the shell ejection part
all the rounds are kept in a full moon type clip that holds all the rounds in place for loading and unloaded
the break is kept close by a latch that makes up the rear sights and operates an internal system that when it unlatches unlocks the hinge and when latched it locks the hinge for added security
Category All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1280 x 695px
File Size 58.6 kB
the design is based from the http://www.forgottenweapons.com/rif.....atic-arms-sac/
actually its pretty manageable
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pfeife.....press_revolver
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pfeife.....press_revolver
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bounding_overwatch
yeah you can if you do that *shi grins* and one who's played any gears game with a boltok knows to do that
yeah you can if you do that *shi grins* and one who's played any gears game with a boltok knows to do that
Well, that doesn't really seem like it would apply to guns. I mean, a gun isn't a bullet. It fires them. Even if there was such ammunition available, I'm sure non expanding bullets could be made. Um, why are expanding bullets banned? And why does a post apocalyptic society honor this ban?
How is it cruel? I mean, I imagine it might be a bit more painful, but it also seems like it would better guarantee a kill. And really, if you're already shooting at them, I think we've passed the point where you're trying to avoid causing pain. But maybe I'm missing something here? Is it, like, exceptionally more painful or something?
Somewhere in the Hague it is detailed not to use specific weapons against soldiers as they cause unnessicary suffering
A bullet wound is easy to treat, a willy pete burn isnt http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_phosphorus check effects on people but get a bucket and some immatrol first
A bullet wound is easy to treat, a willy pete burn isnt http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_phosphorus check effects on people but get a bucket and some immatrol first
It still seems like the expanding rounds would be more likely to get a killing shot. Which is important, because you want your enemies to drop dead when you shoot them, and a lot of times, and I know this probably sounds weird, people can still keep going for a while after they've been hit.
When i went under for my oral surgery they had this brown glass bottle that had the stopper on a lever that was held close with a spring like one half a clothespin... When you levered the stopper away the fluid contents sprayed out as a stream and vaporized on skin contact to chill and numb the site pre-IV by only the heat that was sapped by the vaporization
Comments