
Another "improved" B/W film shot from the Toronto flora conservatory. In reality, this Hibiscus flower was red, and I used a red glass filter to make it leap off of the film. Digital bastardizing is fun. :p
Category Photography / Abstract
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1024 x 622px
File Size 92.4 kB
Listed in Folders
I find it hard to believe i am the only one looking at this am i the only one who loves the black and white, hmm i do know why. you know how to use the filters but plants are not what you put on this site. to appeal to this crowd you need more...how I do i say... sexual themes. Photography is hard to pull off on this site but keep up the good work. as for this picture you should have taken it in negative.
There was a negative stage between the original B/W negative scan and this solarized version, but I enjoy this better. As for animals, most of what I tend to photograph are cats, llamas/alpacas, birds, and insects. I already have several in those categories on here.
I think the only sexual-themed images that I could submit would be staged photographs, providing I could find willing models, and the appropriate settings. But to cater to the specifically furry lusts of the membership, the models might have to wear ears and tails, etc. I have no faith in my drawing capabilities, and stopped producing 'traditional' artwork around ten years ago, when i graduated from high school. I never was terribly good at drawing, and there were always so many more capable artists, so I gave up in disgust and pursued other art forms, like writing, photography, and silk spinning. I don't think any of my writing could even remotely pass off as being fur-centric, as my own sexuality is not tied into the eroticism of animals, and I would never write anything of that genre anyway.
So, let's just leave it as I am a fur who is struggling with his identity as a fur, and the only one of my arts that I feel comfortable sharing with other furs is my photography, even though most of the subject matter falls outside of the "norms" of furry art.
I think the only sexual-themed images that I could submit would be staged photographs, providing I could find willing models, and the appropriate settings. But to cater to the specifically furry lusts of the membership, the models might have to wear ears and tails, etc. I have no faith in my drawing capabilities, and stopped producing 'traditional' artwork around ten years ago, when i graduated from high school. I never was terribly good at drawing, and there were always so many more capable artists, so I gave up in disgust and pursued other art forms, like writing, photography, and silk spinning. I don't think any of my writing could even remotely pass off as being fur-centric, as my own sexuality is not tied into the eroticism of animals, and I would never write anything of that genre anyway.
So, let's just leave it as I am a fur who is struggling with his identity as a fur, and the only one of my arts that I feel comfortable sharing with other furs is my photography, even though most of the subject matter falls outside of the "norms" of furry art.
You don't need good models or ears and tails to pull it off. You should see my page. I've only put one photograph up so far and it had 55 views last i checked.
As for being a fur. I don't have one furry picture up nor do i intend to put one up. As for my self I do'nt even pretend to be a furry. You can appeal to the intrest here in so many ways.
Your not an alien here, you just need to blend in by standing out.
As for being a fur. I don't have one furry picture up nor do i intend to put one up. As for my self I do'nt even pretend to be a furry. You can appeal to the intrest here in so many ways.
Your not an alien here, you just need to blend in by standing out.
Comments