
So someone said that his Vector Arms AK-47 could do anything that an AR-15 could do, simply because he had a scope co-witnessing with a red-dot and some other junk. So, to prove him wrong, and waste some time, I decided to tacti-cool out my AR with everything I had readily available.
Unfortunately, I can't have a bayonet lug, can't have a threaded muzzle or flash hider, and can't have a telescoping stock due to the New York state assault weapon ban.
But anyways, the stuff I have on here for the time being is:
- Dorsey flashlight in a 1" scope ring with rails
- Generic railmount flashlight
- Generic railmount laser/light
- Soft brass catcher
- TC Accessories carry handle mounted brass deflector
- Tapco Ergo Vertical Grip
- Houge overmolded pistol grip
- Pre-ban C-Products Beta magazine
- Hi-Standard forward handguards (replaces thick and heavy plastic ones for lighter ones with aluminum lining)
I think that's about everything.
He was able to chamber a round by slamming his butt on the ground, but I doubt my AR is able to do that, as it has tight-fitting locking lugs, which are essential to an accurate rifle.
Unfortunately, I can't have a bayonet lug, can't have a threaded muzzle or flash hider, and can't have a telescoping stock due to the New York state assault weapon ban.
But anyways, the stuff I have on here for the time being is:
- Dorsey flashlight in a 1" scope ring with rails
- Generic railmount flashlight
- Generic railmount laser/light
- Soft brass catcher
- TC Accessories carry handle mounted brass deflector
- Tapco Ergo Vertical Grip
- Houge overmolded pistol grip
- Pre-ban C-Products Beta magazine
- Hi-Standard forward handguards (replaces thick and heavy plastic ones for lighter ones with aluminum lining)
I think that's about everything.
He was able to chamber a round by slamming his butt on the ground, but I doubt my AR is able to do that, as it has tight-fitting locking lugs, which are essential to an accurate rifle.
Category Photography / Portraits
Species Rodent (Other)
Size 607 x 1280px
File Size 524.3 kB
Listed in Folders
And here I am with a rifle planned that will probably weigh upwards of 25-30 pounds, possibly without optics on it. Something tells me that when I get it built, I'm pretty much going to be the only person willing to/capable of using it.
Also, you need some side rails on that thing.
Also, you need some side rails on that thing.
As we speak I'm actually in the process of replacing the cracked plastic handguards with the screw on 'fail rails' with a solid Midwest Industries extended free-floating forend. I kinda want to get a three-flashlight setup for night shooting, I've seen one at Knob Creek, and it was pretty good for lighting up everything.
But I'd like to see what you have planned, it sounds interesting.
But I'd like to see what you have planned, it sounds interesting.
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/1590752/ 5'4" long target rifle. I'd call it a sniper rifle but people are already afraid I'm going to go nuts and shoot people and Sniper Rifle just raises all kinds of red flags, plus at that size and weight (solid oak forend) it's going to be a tad heavy for sniping.
Still need to figure out how I want to put a bipod on that, I'm going to need one.
Still need to figure out how I want to put a bipod on that, I'm going to need one.
Hmm, those Harris bipods look pretty decent, but they're a tad pricey. Then again, they've got built in recoil springs which might be good for the .300 winchester magnum rounds I'll be sending down the 42" barrel. Depending on the thickness of the oak board I make this out of, I might be able to make a second stock from one set of cuts, which I'd probably then use to make an almost identical gun in either plain old .308, or possibly in something big like .50 Alaskan.
Gun is based off of Clive Winslet's gun, the Gungnir HAG35. http://www.rpgclassics.com/shrines/...../wa3/clive.jpg My gun is actually going to be named the Gungnir HAG36 in honor of the weapon it's based off of.
Gun is based off of Clive Winslet's gun, the Gungnir HAG35. http://www.rpgclassics.com/shrines/...../wa3/clive.jpg My gun is actually going to be named the Gungnir HAG36 in honor of the weapon it's based off of.
Interesting. Sounds expensive.
And yes, my longrifle likely will be far from practical, but custom making it will make it fit my length of pull (I'm tall, and I've got long arms for my height), and if I can ever find and enter a long range shooting competition of some sort, if it helps me win (weight and length will keep it very, very stable and make minute adjustments of aim easier), then who cares if it isn't too easy to carry around?
Plus, there's something to be said for having a gun as long as some people are tall (going to make a giant gun case for it to carry it in, which will be even taller, and have the most padded comfy shoulder strap I can find)
And yes, my longrifle likely will be far from practical, but custom making it will make it fit my length of pull (I'm tall, and I've got long arms for my height), and if I can ever find and enter a long range shooting competition of some sort, if it helps me win (weight and length will keep it very, very stable and make minute adjustments of aim easier), then who cares if it isn't too easy to carry around?
Plus, there's something to be said for having a gun as long as some people are tall (going to make a giant gun case for it to carry it in, which will be even taller, and have the most padded comfy shoulder strap I can find)
No, I have on Airsoft toy. The little light and the laser/light is from an Airsoft site, though.
Next time we go shooting at a a good private range I'll bring the Airsoft, though, I'd like to shoot it. Realistic fake guns are banned where I live, so they all have to be made of clear plastic. Pretty stupid, when you can purchase rifles and stuff normally. Or a 1919 like I recently got, which I need to take pictures of once my good computer is fixed.
Next time we go shooting at a a good private range I'll bring the Airsoft, though, I'd like to shoot it. Realistic fake guns are banned where I live, so they all have to be made of clear plastic. Pretty stupid, when you can purchase rifles and stuff normally. Or a 1919 like I recently got, which I need to take pictures of once my good computer is fixed.
If I had bought it like that, it would have been cheaper. It's a lower from a Bushmaster target rifle, that set me back about $1200, then a DPMS Carbine upper set me back another $400. Buying a carbine in the first place would have been about $800 or so, but I bought the carbine upper as an after thought, seeing as how I don't always have the range to make the most of the target upper. As for the rest:
C-Products Beta Mag: $275
Carry handle rail: $12
AIM Sport Red-Dot sight: $40
Cantilever mount for Red-Dot: $12
Nikon Omni riflescope: $60 (It goes on my slug gun, but took a vacation over here just for this picture.)
Carbine-Length handguard rail: $9
Railmount light and laser/light: $3 from an airsoft site.
Soft Brass Catcher: $9
Vertical foregrip: $20
Dorsey® LED flashlight: FREE
Now, if you think that's bad, wait 'til you see what I picked up at the gun show last weekend!
C-Products Beta Mag: $275
Carry handle rail: $12
AIM Sport Red-Dot sight: $40
Cantilever mount for Red-Dot: $12
Nikon Omni riflescope: $60 (It goes on my slug gun, but took a vacation over here just for this picture.)
Carbine-Length handguard rail: $9
Railmount light and laser/light: $3 from an airsoft site.
Soft Brass Catcher: $9
Vertical foregrip: $20
Dorsey® LED flashlight: FREE
Now, if you think that's bad, wait 'til you see what I picked up at the gun show last weekend!
Thanks for the fav. While it would seem like they're all practical attachments, it is a little on the heavy side with all that stuff on there. Right now I have as much as I'll likely ever shoot it with on there, and that's a red dot, vert grip, and maybe a light. I have some 30 rounders for normal shooting use, but tracked down a pre-ban Beta Mag just because they're fairly elusive, with some examples going over $800.
So you basically turned a composite assault rifle into something monstrous and practically unusable. Don't get me wrong, you showed that kid on youtube what's what (and a loose action like that ain't no good for a gun anyhow), and the concept is pretty funny, I gotta ask though, what ever happened to good old fixed sights?
They're back now. Only thing I have on it now is a vertical forgrip and an EoTech. The iron sights cowitness on the lower third of the holographic EO Tech sight, so both remain fully functional. Originally I bought this carbine upper as a way to get iron sights and a lighter upper that I wouldn't feel so bad about abusing on my Bushmaster Varminter rifle, but this is strictly just to show how much I could stuff on here.
Occasionally, airsoft stuff holds up well on a real firearm and is actually cheaper.
Though I wouldn't rely on it too heavily. Additionally, that comment was a bit of an inside joke.
Quick question: My Chink-o Norinco SKS' stock is in not so fantastic shape. The bore looks pretty decent, it's just I don't really like the shape the stock is in. You know of any good synthetic stocks? I don't really need anything too pricey with rails, just curious what you would suggest in the way of synthetic or sporter stocks.
Though I wouldn't rely on it too heavily. Additionally, that comment was a bit of an inside joke.
Quick question: My Chink-o Norinco SKS' stock is in not so fantastic shape. The bore looks pretty decent, it's just I don't really like the shape the stock is in. You know of any good synthetic stocks? I don't really need anything too pricey with rails, just curious what you would suggest in the way of synthetic or sporter stocks.
ATI makes a few stocks for the SKS that aren't too bad without breaking the bank. There's a Monte Carlo or Dragnov style for shooting accurately, or a side folder that'd make for a nice pack rifle. Butler Creek makes another nice Monte Carlo stock that'd probably take less fitting to work well. Choate makes a side-folder, and it'd probably fit nice if that's the type of stock you'd want. Choate does make good stocks. And Tapco had an M4-styled tele-stock available. I haven't gotten an SKS yet, so I'm not quite sure on all the ins and outs there.
Ah, sorry to hear that. I personally think it's a shame that a country would pass a law prohibiting a law-abiding citizen to own a bit of metal and plastic, or wood, too. Proponents of such laws say that they prevent crime, but if a crime's going to happen, it's going to happen. If the criminal doesn't own a firearm, then they'll use a knife, if they don't have a knife, they'll use whatever's heavy and handy. Now the victim here is the law abiding citizen, they no longer have proper means to defend themselves from muggers, home intruders, and other criminals that will be armed.
Yeah. Maybe somebody'll make one for less. The same way Mossberg is making fairly nice doubles for $500, and the same way that I picked up a new coach gun with interchangeable chokes for $300. I'd like to shoot skeet with it, sometime, just to see the reaction from guys who spent $1500 dollars on fancy doubles and hundreds of dollars on cryogenic treated choke tubes, having their rifle backbored, and buy custom loaded shells. Then I come with a cheap coach gun, the chokes it came from, and a mix of cheapo target loads and stuff I've made myself.
Yeah, if you look at my 'Franken-guns', I put together the 1911 by hand from an unfinished casting. I didn't have a milling machine, and I wore out a Dremel cutting the rails, but it works great, and is very accurate, and was far cheaper than buying a frame and building a rifle, not to mention legal. I don't have a pistol permit, so buying or owning a pistol frame is strictly forbidden. This one, however, was built to only work with the Mech Tech carbine conversions, so I should be safe.
Reminds me of the gunfight scene in Naked Gun 2 1/2
http://youtube.com/watch?v=vvkDE7S5BCc
It starts at 8:00, in case you don't know what I'm talking about
http://youtube.com/watch?v=vvkDE7S5BCc
It starts at 8:00, in case you don't know what I'm talking about
Bah but its too heavy and cumbersome now! XD
I'm happy with my Aimpoint and soon I'll have Remington's 870LM shorty attatchment where the grenade launcher goes >:D
http://www.autoweapons.com/photos07.....emqdmountc.jpg
But thats for zombie applications only.
I'm happy with my Aimpoint and soon I'll have Remington's 870LM shorty attatchment where the grenade launcher goes >:D
http://www.autoweapons.com/photos07.....emqdmountc.jpg
But thats for zombie applications only.
I'd like to get one of those, or a Serbu Super Shorty, but here in New York state smoothbores classified as an AOW are regulated as pistols, and I doubt I could get one under a SBS stamp, as the law enforcement around here is pretty anti-gun for the most part. If there's zombies, I have a Benelli-style autoloader for zombies over here, and a .45-70 rifle for zombies over there.
And I'd never try and shoot this mess of a rifle like it is now. The most I have on it at once, for any practical purpose, is the EO Tech, forward grip, and maybe a flashlight.
And I'd never try and shoot this mess of a rifle like it is now. The most I have on it at once, for any practical purpose, is the EO Tech, forward grip, and maybe a flashlight.
Ah. I went with the 512 since I don't have any night vision. I was thinking about getting an ML2 for my 1911 carbine, though. The EO Techs just seem to be sturdier, though. I put the Omni muzzle loader scope on it that's on this one, and the bullet drop compensator seems to come close.
That's terrible. What are guns but a bit of metal and wood, and your government won't let you have them?
The 416 and 417 are very nice firearms, but very expensive. They're a good solution to a problem that's become insignificant, though, as the later models of the AR type rifles have a few minor changes that allows the direct impingement gas system operate dependably when dirty. But despite all that, I'd still like to get one.
The 416 and 417 are very nice firearms, but very expensive. They're a good solution to a problem that's become insignificant, though, as the later models of the AR type rifles have a few minor changes that allows the direct impingement gas system operate dependably when dirty. But despite all that, I'd still like to get one.
The coolest thing about the 416 and 417 is how they divert the bullets combustion gas to keep the firing mechanisms cool
but all the problems with U.S service rifles can be fixed with relativly simple mods. Eventualy modified AR rifles would cost about the same as a 416 or 417 anyway. If you search HK 416 on youtube theres plenty info about it. ^_^
but all the problems with U.S service rifles can be fixed with relativly simple mods. Eventualy modified AR rifles would cost about the same as a 416 or 417 anyway. If you search HK 416 on youtube theres plenty info about it. ^_^
Yep. As much as I do like the short-stroke piston system that's in my M1A for being as clean as it is, it's also harder to clean. And it does need to be cleaned, but not as often as the AR-15 necessitates. I personally don't see much use for keeping your internals cool, but I suppose it couldn't hurt. The barrel and chamber will still heat up, which is a problem for accuracy, service life, and will cause cook-offs.
As for the information on YouTube, some of it can be very misleading. The FutureWeapons stuff, specifically.
As for the information on YouTube, some of it can be very misleading. The FutureWeapons stuff, specifically.
An M-60 would be very expensive, even in the legal semi-auto trim. And for the Dragunov, I was looking into it(or a Tigr), but with all the parts kits, the different countries building their own versions, and other issues, I've decided against building one for now. But I haven't ruled it out, either.
I do try and reload as much as I can. Unfortunately, the volume at which I'm shooting recently has far exceeded what I'm able to reload with my current setup, so I'm no longer catching and keeping brass. I do, however, reload for my Savage 10FP, the bolt-action rifle, as it shoots far better with handloads than it does even with match ammunition. And the good stuff usually exceeds $30 for a box of 20. I can reload that whole box for less than $5. Same with .45-70, and I'm getting a Lee lead pot so I can cast my own 405 grain .458 bullets from wheel weights.
As far as gun control, I agree with you on 19,998 laws. I believe that any firearm should be reasonable for civilian ownership, including handguns, but that the NICS check is necessary to prevent criminals and the mentally unstable from arming themselves with the same weapons. I also believe that open carry is a great way to prevent crime, and that having a national shall-issue concealed carry permit would do wonders in fighting crime where it starts. If widespread availability of guns causes shootouts, then why have mass shootings only ever happened in places where guns aren't allowed, such as schools, malls, post offices, and Washington D.C.. According to that, they should be happening at gun shows, outdoor shows, Front Sight and Blackwater training (although they do have shootings, but the only victims are paper or steel plates.) shooting ranges, and other places where everyone has guns?
As far as gun control, I agree with you on 19,998 laws. I believe that any firearm should be reasonable for civilian ownership, including handguns, but that the NICS check is necessary to prevent criminals and the mentally unstable from arming themselves with the same weapons. I also believe that open carry is a great way to prevent crime, and that having a national shall-issue concealed carry permit would do wonders in fighting crime where it starts. If widespread availability of guns causes shootouts, then why have mass shootings only ever happened in places where guns aren't allowed, such as schools, malls, post offices, and Washington D.C.. According to that, they should be happening at gun shows, outdoor shows, Front Sight and Blackwater training (although they do have shootings, but the only victims are paper or steel plates.) shooting ranges, and other places where everyone has guns?
yes my primary issu with anti gun control is not only that its our right to do more than bring kitchen knives along with us in defense of ourselves
but also that it has been connected with video game violence
one argument that is applicable is that less than 1-2 decades ago guns were far more available than now and that violence in the media was not censored as greatly and there was less violence at the time therefore i submit that why are they responsible now? in an age where media violence is controlled and guns are less available why are they now an issue? its not guns OR media violence but in fact the slow decay of the once strong family unit and the morals it set.
there in your face gov. tight asses!!!
but also that it has been connected with video game violence
one argument that is applicable is that less than 1-2 decades ago guns were far more available than now and that violence in the media was not censored as greatly and there was less violence at the time therefore i submit that why are they responsible now? in an age where media violence is controlled and guns are less available why are they now an issue? its not guns OR media violence but in fact the slow decay of the once strong family unit and the morals it set.
there in your face gov. tight asses!!!
There's that, too. Guns also have been given a strongly negative taboo by the media, as well as the government passing more and more laws against various types of firearms, both cause fewer and fewer parents bother to teach their kids about gun safety and proper use of firearms. The gangster culture plaguing the U.S. is also largely at fault, telling kids to go perpetrate random acts of senseless violence with whatever they can get their hands on.
Yes, it really is impractical. The thing about having the scopes like that the front one is a red dot(non-magnified, shines a laser onto a parabolic reflector), and the rear is a normal 3-9x scope, so when looking through it seems about normal, but the red dot shows up in addition to the crosshairs. It's really rather pointless. This rifle is entirely compliant with the New York Assault Weapon Ban, so it should be legal pretty much anywhere. So are you in Idaho or Canada?
I just might! I do load my own .223 for another rifle, and could just as easily do it for this one, as well. But I might as well not.
I think a more appropriate "Sasha" might be the Marlin 1895 GS lever action with Leupold Scout scope on an XS rail with the XS winged ghost ring sights. I just got done loading a pile of .45-70 loads for that with hand cast lead bullets and my own custom powder load.
I think a more appropriate "Sasha" might be the Marlin 1895 GS lever action with Leupold Scout scope on an XS rail with the XS winged ghost ring sights. I just got done loading a pile of .45-70 loads for that with hand cast lead bullets and my own custom powder load.
Holy shit... a bit over kill there, that firearm has to weigh around 15-16 pounds when fully loaded I'm keeping my AR slim, all got on it is what ever makes it a perfect sniper rifle.
Harris Bipod mounted to a quad rail free float tube with a small fore grip that holds a ten round clip ( the OH SHIT mag)
4x12 x 40mm scope with quick detach rings and flip up sights
All I need is a mount for my Surefire flashlight and I'm set
Harris Bipod mounted to a quad rail free float tube with a small fore grip that holds a ten round clip ( the OH SHIT mag)
4x12 x 40mm scope with quick detach rings and flip up sights
All I need is a mount for my Surefire flashlight and I'm set
Sounds about like what I actually have on this thing, but on two separate uppers.
On the HBAR, I have a Millet TRS-2 10x50 illuminated reticule scope, 6-9" Harris Bipod, Troy rear sight, and a Midwest gas block front sight.
I have a carbine upper for plinking that has a a foregrip, it's quite fun.
I'm working on what's likely just a lost cause, a light barreled water cooled carbine length upper. No real purpose, since all I have is a semi-auto, but nice as a show piece.
On the HBAR, I have a Millet TRS-2 10x50 illuminated reticule scope, 6-9" Harris Bipod, Troy rear sight, and a Midwest gas block front sight.
I have a carbine upper for plinking that has a a foregrip, it's quite fun.
I'm working on what's likely just a lost cause, a light barreled water cooled carbine length upper. No real purpose, since all I have is a semi-auto, but nice as a show piece.
I've seen people do that, but there's a way to do it better.
If you split the neck of the bottle, you can use a hose clamp to hold it on tighter. Then, take a piece of screen, stuff the bottle full of steel wool, and force the screen down the center, in line with where the bore will be. A little squirt of lithium grease on the steel wool will help a little bit. Then put a little electrical tape over the muzzle of the rifle, slide the bottle over it, clamp down, and tape over that to prevent any leaks. Look down the bore and make sure that the screen is lined up so that nothing is obstructing the bullet path. First shot should make a hole, and it's surprisingly quiet compared to a plain bottle. Taping over the outside of the bottle helps just a little bit, too.
But constructing one of those is breaking the law, if you're caught with it. As it stands, any device which makes a firearm quieter(and therefore safer, as well) is an NFA item, and illegal to posses without a tax stamp. But that's only if you're caught.
If you split the neck of the bottle, you can use a hose clamp to hold it on tighter. Then, take a piece of screen, stuff the bottle full of steel wool, and force the screen down the center, in line with where the bore will be. A little squirt of lithium grease on the steel wool will help a little bit. Then put a little electrical tape over the muzzle of the rifle, slide the bottle over it, clamp down, and tape over that to prevent any leaks. Look down the bore and make sure that the screen is lined up so that nothing is obstructing the bullet path. First shot should make a hole, and it's surprisingly quiet compared to a plain bottle. Taping over the outside of the bottle helps just a little bit, too.
But constructing one of those is breaking the law, if you're caught with it. As it stands, any device which makes a firearm quieter(and therefore safer, as well) is an NFA item, and illegal to posses without a tax stamp. But that's only if you're caught.
Wait 'til you see the new one. It has an Midwest Industries 4-rail forend, flat-top receiver, which I'll need to get a folding rear sight for, Yankee Hill Machine muzzle break, Wilson Combat M4 profile match grade barrel, and an ACE skeleton stock. Should be a pretty awesome piece of shooting machinery.
Unfortunately, mass media and all that portray sound suppressors as being tools of hitmen and murderers, when in reality they were very rarely used in crime, and are more of a safety device, and a way to keep shooting ranges quieter. They're legal in most states, but not this one, and that's only after you pay $200 for a tax stamp, have a background check, and have your local Chief law enforcement officer sign off on your application, then you can buy one.
Heh, very well. I've already picked up a Delton lower at a gun show, grabbed a DPMS Lower Parts Kit before they dried up, an ACE stock for the full-length buffer tube, and put together a flat top upper, minus barrel, with a folding YHM rear sight. Currently, I have a Wilson Combat M4 profile barrel that's back ordered until February. The rail I have for this is a MI carbine length extended past the front sight. There's a YHM Phantom muzzle brake to solder on here to finish it off, too.
The receiver in this picture's going full time with the precision AR setup I have, the lightweight match trigger never really suited the carbine, and I stuck a Choate target stock and hydraulic recoil buffer on there, hopefully it'll help with accuracy at least a little bit.
The receiver in this picture's going full time with the precision AR setup I have, the lightweight match trigger never really suited the carbine, and I stuck a Choate target stock and hydraulic recoil buffer on there, hopefully it'll help with accuracy at least a little bit.
I'll have the irons until I can figure that out, but the nice thing about optics is that they can be easily changed out, so long as you have more of 'em. I do have an EO Tech, and I do like it for speed, but I don't have an Aimpoint, just a couple cheap copies. Who knows, I might end up splurging on an ACOG.
I also was thinking about picking up two or three cheap rail-mount flashlights for shooting at night, or I may end up going for a lower end NV scope.
I also was thinking about picking up two or three cheap rail-mount flashlights for shooting at night, or I may end up going for a lower end NV scope.
Ok, you can take or leave this advice... its worth what you paid for it. I've got an ACOG on my M4 and went through the Army's SDM course with both iron sights and ACOG. TWo weeks of nothing but shooting all day long out to 600 meters.
My experience has made me dislike the ACOG.
The eye relief is short and you have to be ever conscious of the position of your stock when you assume various shooting positions. Its easy to whack yourself in the eyebrow. Also, the ACOG lacks windage and elevation click adjustment drums. You have to unscrew the caps and use a coin or a shell casing to adjust for windage... this wouldnt be so bad if the ACOG had windage hold-off marks, like an SVD scope. But it doesnt. So basically, you've got to memorize set holdoffs in various wind conditions at various distances.
Also, in my experience the QD mount of the ACOG is not 100% return to zero. In switching from iron sights to ACOG and back we noticed as much as a 2 MOA shift in zero... and this wasnt in any c onsistent direction, so it couldnt be predicted.
Also, the ACOG windage and elevation adjustments had a tendancy of sticking. To assure that any adjustments you made would "settle" and not stack up on you, you had to tap the drums after each adjustment with a plastic block. Some people still had problems.
In up close shooting, the ACOG is noticeably slower then the EOtech or the AImpoint due to the eye relief issue and the narrow field of view. Further, for the before mentioned things, it is not really ideal for mid-long distance shooting either. A Leupold CQ/T variable would be a better choice if you're gonna drop big bucks...
But since we're talking about a carbine here, why not stick to what a carbine is good for? Light, fast shooting at short to mid ranges... For that, an aimpoint or eotech is fine..
I've got a Comp M3 that I adore...and the Aimpoint Micro T-1 is becoming my favorite sight. Either one would cost way less then the ACOG.
My experience has made me dislike the ACOG.
The eye relief is short and you have to be ever conscious of the position of your stock when you assume various shooting positions. Its easy to whack yourself in the eyebrow. Also, the ACOG lacks windage and elevation click adjustment drums. You have to unscrew the caps and use a coin or a shell casing to adjust for windage... this wouldnt be so bad if the ACOG had windage hold-off marks, like an SVD scope. But it doesnt. So basically, you've got to memorize set holdoffs in various wind conditions at various distances.
Also, in my experience the QD mount of the ACOG is not 100% return to zero. In switching from iron sights to ACOG and back we noticed as much as a 2 MOA shift in zero... and this wasnt in any c onsistent direction, so it couldnt be predicted.
Also, the ACOG windage and elevation adjustments had a tendancy of sticking. To assure that any adjustments you made would "settle" and not stack up on you, you had to tap the drums after each adjustment with a plastic block. Some people still had problems.
In up close shooting, the ACOG is noticeably slower then the EOtech or the AImpoint due to the eye relief issue and the narrow field of view. Further, for the before mentioned things, it is not really ideal for mid-long distance shooting either. A Leupold CQ/T variable would be a better choice if you're gonna drop big bucks...
But since we're talking about a carbine here, why not stick to what a carbine is good for? Light, fast shooting at short to mid ranges... For that, an aimpoint or eotech is fine..
I've got a Comp M3 that I adore...and the Aimpoint Micro T-1 is becoming my favorite sight. Either one would cost way less then the ACOG.
Yeah, the ACOG certainly high on my list. But I had thought about the Leupold CQ/T, or maybe a second Millet DMS-1.
I did have an Aimpoint Comp M2 on my wishlist for a while, but ended up never getting it. The Micro does have it's appeal, and I was also considering a Doctor on a tall ARMS mount, similar to this, but without the built in rear sight.
There's also a strange urge to get an occluded eye gun sight for simplicity and reliability.
I did have an Aimpoint Comp M2 on my wishlist for a while, but ended up never getting it. The Micro does have it's appeal, and I was also considering a Doctor on a tall ARMS mount, similar to this, but without the built in rear sight.
There's also a strange urge to get an occluded eye gun sight for simplicity and reliability.
Why do you want an occluded eye gunsight? The concept doesnt make a lot of sense to me.
The Doctor has a smaller viewing window then the Micro and costs about the same... and also doesnt have the runtime or water resistance of the T-1 or H-1. Check Botach for the best prices on it and the newer Aimpoints.
Really, the Comp m4 is an awesome sight too.
The Doctor has a smaller viewing window then the Micro and costs about the same... and also doesnt have the runtime or water resistance of the T-1 or H-1. Check Botach for the best prices on it and the newer Aimpoints.
Really, the Comp m4 is an awesome sight too.
All this is exactly why it's still up in the air. With the industry today, I can have almost whatever I want in an optic, but I just have to figure out exactly what that is.
I always thought OEGs were somewhat odd, but not having to buy batteries is nice, and it's an interesting concept. Saw one at a recent gun show that used a mirror to work like a red dot, but it only clamped onto shotguns, and it was fairly bulky.
I always thought OEGs were somewhat odd, but not having to buy batteries is nice, and it's an interesting concept. Saw one at a recent gun show that used a mirror to work like a red dot, but it only clamped onto shotguns, and it was fairly bulky.
Unfortunately, living in New York, I can't use a telescoping stock unless I'm willing to pay almost a grand extra for a pre-ban rifle. I've never really been a fan taping mags together, rather I just carry an extra six in pouches, but with the Beta mag will hold 100 rounds reliably without having to reload.
My next rifle that I'm currently working on does have a lightweight ACE tube stock which is about an inch shorter than the A2 stock on here, and will incorporate an extended rail forend, and it's been backordered for a while, don't know if I'll ever get it, but a Wilson Combat M4 profile 16" barrel with an attached Yankee Hill Machine muzzle brake. And it will still comply with the '94 AWB in effect in New York state, but is no longer in effect in the United States.
My next rifle that I'm currently working on does have a lightweight ACE tube stock which is about an inch shorter than the A2 stock on here, and will incorporate an extended rail forend, and it's been backordered for a while, don't know if I'll ever get it, but a Wilson Combat M4 profile 16" barrel with an attached Yankee Hill Machine muzzle brake. And it will still comply with the '94 AWB in effect in New York state, but is no longer in effect in the United States.
[u=http://www.bad-dragon.com/forum/dow.....ere's[/u] a bad picture of what I have so far.
Everything's been backordered due to the election. I've been waiting since about a week or two before the election, but still no barrel. There's other barrels available, but I had wanted to do this rifle right and get a good Wilson Combat barrel.
I've played paintball before, much better than airsoft, and I'd play it again if I knew of anywhere around here to play it.
I've played paintball before, much better than airsoft, and I'd play it again if I knew of anywhere around here to play it.
Probably both some good and some bad. But I'm one step ahead of you on the rails, I have here a nearly completed flat top upper with an MI extended carbine length quad rail system, just waiting on the 14.5" barrel so I can finish it. It's paired with a different lower with an ACE tube stock. Right now I have another upper I built using a DPMS Tuber handguard, which entirely covers the barrel, making it much more fursuiter friendly.
And yeah, Beta mags are great. I was lucky to find this pre-ban one for a reasonable price, I've seen pre-ban ones at gun shows on sale for as high as $800. The really nice thing about it is I can use it with my heavy barreled Bushmaster Varminter while shooting prone, and it protrudes hardly more than a 10 round magazine, and I can stay prone longer because I don't have to reload nearly as often.
And yeah, Beta mags are great. I was lucky to find this pre-ban one for a reasonable price, I've seen pre-ban ones at gun shows on sale for as high as $800. The really nice thing about it is I can use it with my heavy barreled Bushmaster Varminter while shooting prone, and it protrudes hardly more than a 10 round magazine, and I can stay prone longer because I don't have to reload nearly as often.
This was a joke, because someone put too much junk on his AK and said that an AR couldn't do all that. So I did. Then I took it all off. I'd hate to do that to my AKs, since two are milled Polytechs, one's a WASR, and the recoil of a 12 and .308 Saiga would probably shake it all apart.
In all honesty, that's not even the half of it.
About a quarter of my room is knee-high in ammo, while I have cases more in the living room, and some handmade stuff by my reloading press. Now that you mention it, I might just put it all together, take a picture, and write "...AND I VOTE!" underneath. Send it anonymously to anyone I have a vote for.
About a quarter of my room is knee-high in ammo, while I have cases more in the living room, and some handmade stuff by my reloading press. Now that you mention it, I might just put it all together, take a picture, and write "...AND I VOTE!" underneath. Send it anonymously to anyone I have a vote for.
That's about what I did with my latest carbine project. I started out with a stripped lower receiver, and built it to be light weight and maneuverable, with an ACE telestock and A4 upper receiver. I used a 14.5" carbine profile barrel with a spikey YHM muzzle brake, a MI quad rail forend, a single, super-bright flashlight, and a green laser. I have a better pistol grip on there, too. For sights, I picked up an Aimpoint Micro T-1, and there's a Yankee Hill flip-up rear. It's quite a potent little carbine.
Unfortunately, I don't have a picture of it in it's current configuration.
Unfortunately, I don't have a picture of it in it's current configuration.
Join the Free State Project and move to New Hampshire. You can open carry there. I have the Minnesota to cary a firearm.
http://www.freestateproject.org/
http://www.freestateproject.org/
Nope!
The problem with this one is that it's too soft, and after a handful of rounds, it's bent down and clogs, so the next round out of the rifle won't clear the ejection port and will stovepipe. I stiffened it up with a wire, but at this point it's mostly just for catching .300-221 and 6.5 Grendel cases I've formed by hand.
The problem with this one is that it's too soft, and after a handful of rounds, it's bent down and clogs, so the next round out of the rifle won't clear the ejection port and will stovepipe. I stiffened it up with a wire, but at this point it's mostly just for catching .300-221 and 6.5 Grendel cases I've formed by hand.
Comments