
Dig into Reading - Postcard Illustration
---DISCLAIMER-DISCLAIMER-DISCLAIMER---
I do not claim to understand dinosaur anatomy/feather patterns/anything dinosaur related. I did a small amount of research on Velociraptor mongoliensis which I used as a looooooooose base for the dino to the left. I know there are a ton of errors with it and I am aware of that, but this was not meant to be a scientific illustration. If I get a flood of comments telling me what I did wrong I will simply point you up to this disclaimer :x I know a lot of people out there are serious about their dinos.
Well! That out of the way, this was a small drawing I did for postcards for the raptor center to send out! This year's theme for libraries is "Dig into Reading," so naturally we got the idea to show where raptors came from, through what we discovered through archeological digs! Birds are modern day dinosaurs, isn't that awesome? Ever wanted to have a pet dinosaur? You can! :D
Various hardnesses of graphite on Bristol vellum paper, ~8X12 inches.
I do not claim to understand dinosaur anatomy/feather patterns/anything dinosaur related. I did a small amount of research on Velociraptor mongoliensis which I used as a looooooooose base for the dino to the left. I know there are a ton of errors with it and I am aware of that, but this was not meant to be a scientific illustration. If I get a flood of comments telling me what I did wrong I will simply point you up to this disclaimer :x I know a lot of people out there are serious about their dinos.
Well! That out of the way, this was a small drawing I did for postcards for the raptor center to send out! This year's theme for libraries is "Dig into Reading," so naturally we got the idea to show where raptors came from, through what we discovered through archeological digs! Birds are modern day dinosaurs, isn't that awesome? Ever wanted to have a pet dinosaur? You can! :D
Various hardnesses of graphite on Bristol vellum paper, ~8X12 inches.
Category Artwork (Traditional) / Animal related (non-anthro)
Species Dinosaur
Size 900 x 540px
File Size 199.9 kB
I personally think all dinosaur art is peoples opinions on them and most likely incorrect haha. Though I suppose the bone structure could be off *shrugs* paleoartists even say that their version of dinos is exactly that their version or idea of them.
after all we usually dont take into consideration fat, loose skin etc. This blog kinda puts it into good perspective:
http://referencesforartists.tumblr......yesterdays-the
after all we usually dont take into consideration fat, loose skin etc. This blog kinda puts it into good perspective:
http://referencesforartists.tumblr......yesterdays-the
That's a super interesting argument :0 We probably ARE seeing long-extinct animals incorrectly. It's an interesting point with the cow, where the fat, muscle etc would certainly have rotted away, if not been eaten, before it had a chance to sink into mud or another preserving material to create a fossil. If we went just by the skeleton, we could mistake it for being like the horse in terms of physical activity.
See I found it extremely interesting once I found out they found "mummified" dinosaur. which basically told them how we've been articulating dinosaurs is completely wrong and the bones are actually farther apart then what we originally thought and how museums were stacking the vertebrae, meaning many dinos are longer and taller then thought. That AND because they found a full tail of this dinosaur they found out they were drawing and interpreting the tail too small AND they were placing the musculature incorrectly. They had to pretty much change their whole concept of how this dinosaur moved and how bulky it truly was.
It's common too it's the hadrosaur or duckbill hahaha
here is the article about the mummy dino
http://www.wired.com/science/discov...../12/dino_mummy
they did a national geo special on it which is how I came across it.
Interesting stuff..and def makes you think haha
It's common too it's the hadrosaur or duckbill hahaha
here is the article about the mummy dino
http://www.wired.com/science/discov...../12/dino_mummy
they did a national geo special on it which is how I came across it.
Interesting stuff..and def makes you think haha
i approve of your post. i do find it peculiar when people aggressively correct others on how certain things should look when we only have a certain amount of knowledge to begin with and the current information could become outdated and accepted interpretations proven incorrect. as you say, artists are kind of pushed into using their imagination and/or filling in gaps with similar creatures. with that considered, you'd think people would be open to different interpretations as a source of discussion and thought (and be careful not to accept certain depictions as the absolute truth). i guess i expect a different attitude from people with scientific interests and am disappointed for people to attempt to belittle each other. i see similar behaviour with people making a fuss over certain anthro features, which probably makes even less sense considering they are fantasy creatures that are usually little more than a form of personal and artistic expression. (i know there isn't much point in this post. i was just pleased to read what you had to say).
I love the disclaimer. XD My favorite criticism to get on dinosaur art is "that's not what they looked like" as if the commenter has eyewitness knowledge. Even the most scientifically accurate dinosaur art is still guess work. Educated guess work but most likely not fully accurate.
As an illustration, this gets it's point across well and is lovely to boot! :D
As an illustration, this gets it's point across well and is lovely to boot! :D
Comments