Prior to the repair. I had a pocket watch from the 1800's, along with a skeleton key of a similar era. I wanted to capture the moment not long after I had come across an interesting part of this jackals history, of which you will see below. Full color shot can be seen here as well as a close up:
Full color: http://sta.sh/0182dc4xpoli
close up: http://sharpe19.deviantart.com/art/.....tail-352588910
A pelt I have been long wanting was a black backed jackal and even though I had seen many for sale, none really stood out to me until I came across this tattered pup. It's previous owner had made an attempt to hydrate the face to shape it better, only to have it start to tear like wet paper, tearing between the ears, several spots on the face, and severely along the neck and behind one ear. I paid and waited for its arrival, not knowing the gender or story that was to be told through the stamp on the inside.
Upon arrival I was stunned at just how petite a jackal really was. I had been planning on a small canine, but certainly not THIS small. I have a mink from a vintage stole placed next to it to show the comparison. I noticed immediately the feel of the leather, the grime on the ears, and the discoloration of the white that this pelt was not new. It was not taken within the past 50 years even. I dove deeper into my suspicions when I looked up the name upon the stamp:
"Tanned by
James L. Clark Studios inc.
Sculptor-taxidermist
New York"
According to the few sites I found, James L. Clark was a rather famous and well renown explorer, sculptor, and taxidermologist, starting his business in 1910, closing shop in 1941. In between that time though he had not only mounted up many pieces for President Theodor Roosevelt himself, but was the main lead for all taxidermy pieces in the American Museum of Natural History in NYC as well as many other things in his life. A lot more info on James himself and his work can be found here: http://www.taxidermy.net/forums/Ind.....427987AD9.html
Mr. Clark had brought back many african specimens on his travels to the safari. I am hoping that if I am able to track down the taxidermist that owned this originally I might learn even more cause I have a sneaking hunch that this pelt might be one of the pieces Mr. Clark himself may have brought back.
The cause of death is a little less of a mystery. Among the riddlement of holes and tears, there are threads that are far older than any recent work, stitching up a hole on the left brow above the eye and sewing together a much larger hole behind the right ear. My best guess? Bullet shot to the head. The hydrating had torn the stitch work behind the right ear free, weakening the ear base. Despite the age though, the tan still has a decent stretch to it, no fur is shedding, and all claws/paws are entirely present. The white may be yellowing a tad, but the golds and blacks are still strong.
All in all I am very excited to have found this pelt. To some it's a symbol of cruelty, others just a bit of fur and leather. To me, it's a story waiting to be told. This pelt has been repaired, the weak leather now backed with another skin to strengthen. It has been handled with care and respect so please be respectful in your words and do not leave hateful comments. It is a very old pelt far older than many of us here on DA. If you have actually read all of this you know how it died and how I got it. You know where it came from and how old it is. So please be mature and keep the rude opinions to yourself.
Category All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1280 x 960px
File Size 183.5 kB
I saw that. Discussing with an admin right now. What I was given was:
FurAffinity only permits taxidermy as "The art or operation of preparing, stuffing, and mounting the skins of dead animals for exhibition in a lifelike state." The site also only allows finished taxidermy works, so as the pelts aren't mounted to look like a live animal they aren't permitted. I've consulted with admin on this before the removals. We will most likely be updating the wording on our taxidermy policies in the future so it is more clear to the user.
To me I don't feel that is right. A pelt is more than just a thing that can be taken pictures of and not all pelts can be mounted. They are missing out on an opportunity to share real life resources for art, reference, and just the overall beauty upon a piece. If it hadn't been for some pelt shots I wouldn't have some of my favorite pieces that were inspired by such skins.
FurAffinity only permits taxidermy as "The art or operation of preparing, stuffing, and mounting the skins of dead animals for exhibition in a lifelike state." The site also only allows finished taxidermy works, so as the pelts aren't mounted to look like a live animal they aren't permitted. I've consulted with admin on this before the removals. We will most likely be updating the wording on our taxidermy policies in the future so it is more clear to the user.
To me I don't feel that is right. A pelt is more than just a thing that can be taken pictures of and not all pelts can be mounted. They are missing out on an opportunity to share real life resources for art, reference, and just the overall beauty upon a piece. If it hadn't been for some pelt shots I wouldn't have some of my favorite pieces that were inspired by such skins.
You know what's funny? The rules have /again/ changed. They never used to disallow unmounted pelts OR wet specimens.
Frankly, they're making a BIG mistake. Neer used to answer me right away on issues of Taxidermy, now he won't even answer my notes.
There are so many bone and fur enthusiasts on this site-- I feel like they're pandering to someone... and it's not the majority.
I'm pretty fed up with it all, really. They won't give me a straight answer. I've spoken to a couple mods about it, one even asked us all to justify our thoughts, to which a bunch of people did, and then he basically said, "Oh, wait, I don't care."
I'm getting really fucking fed up with this hearsay.
Frankly, they're making a BIG mistake. Neer used to answer me right away on issues of Taxidermy, now he won't even answer my notes.
There are so many bone and fur enthusiasts on this site-- I feel like they're pandering to someone... and it's not the majority.
I'm pretty fed up with it all, really. They won't give me a straight answer. I've spoken to a couple mods about it, one even asked us all to justify our thoughts, to which a bunch of people did, and then he basically said, "Oh, wait, I don't care."
I'm getting really fucking fed up with this hearsay.
http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/4307126/
I made a journal about it. Did you go to the admins and complain?
I made a journal about it. Did you go to the admins and complain?
Well then, if you would like to see other shots, here they are on DA:
http://sharpe19.deviantart.com/#/d5tx3qv
http://sharpe19.deviantart.com/#/d5tx3qv
http://sharpe19.deviantart.com/#/d5tx3qv
http://sharpe19.deviantart.com/#/d5tx3qv
Poor Jackal?
How about poor all of us who use pictures of 100 year old pelts for references.
ah well...i personally do not support indistinguishable felines in diapers and binkies.
Comment as posted came out really suspicious.
lol...sorry, you set yourself up wayyyy too well there, couldnt resist.
How about poor all of us who use pictures of 100 year old pelts for references.
ah well...i personally do not support indistinguishable felines in diapers and binkies.
Comment as posted came out really suspicious.
lol...sorry, you set yourself up wayyyy too well there, couldnt resist.
I feel bad about it being killed all those years ago, but I feel even worse that the previouse owner practically destroyed the face. They should have known that trying to stretch it with it sewn up like that wouldn't work. X3
While I don't agree with the ones who traped them souly for thier pelt, I am glad that, once in your hands, you treat thier pelts with great care and respect, in a way honoring the animal. :3
Course....those spook things might not be such a good way to go about it, haha.
Everytime I see them I picture the fox saying "Uuuuuh huh! Not so cute and innocent looking NOW, am I? I WISH a wolf would mess with me!" *booga booga* Hahaha. XD
While I don't agree with the ones who traped them souly for thier pelt, I am glad that, once in your hands, you treat thier pelts with great care and respect, in a way honoring the animal. :3
Course....those spook things might not be such a good way to go about it, haha.
Everytime I see them I picture the fox saying "Uuuuuh huh! Not so cute and innocent looking NOW, am I? I WISH a wolf would mess with me!" *booga booga* Hahaha. XD
FA+

Comments