
I have switched to GIMP, well, not completely. But I'll be using it exclusively on my new computer. I really liked this panel of Chucky and Dave from the next comic page. Also, the inking was done with Photoshop, but the color and background was done in GIMP. I'm very impressed with GIMP so far.
Category All / General Furry Art
Species Skunk
Size 1000 x 832px
File Size 173.3 kB
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barley_wine - quite nice stuff, at least it can be.
Actually, that was sort of the reason. For some strange reason, the serial number of the copy of photoshop I have no longer works. Adobe wants $700 for a new one and I really can't do that. For the most part, GIMP seems to do what I need it to. What version of Photoshop do you get with CS2?
http://www.adobe.com/downloads/cs2_.....ads/index.html
You can get all CS2 products free, the serial number works, I've verified it myself.
You can get all CS2 products free, the serial number works, I've verified it myself.
Hopefully you won't know any difference, but I may still try to get an older version of photoshop working.
Believe it or not, the above picture is a slightly shrunken version of one comic panel. A whole comic page is HUGE. I have to shrink it to less than 1/3 its original size just to meet the maximum upload dimentions.
Believe it or not, the above picture is a slightly shrunken version of one comic panel. A whole comic page is HUGE. I have to shrink it to less than 1/3 its original size just to meet the maximum upload dimentions.
I didn't used to work on big files. I scan my comic at very high resolution(although probably not as high as the really professional artists) so it gets that smooth look to it. The result is very large files. If you look at some of the early Chucky comic pages, they were scanned at a low resolution. I didn't know any better back then, and the size they appear on here, is exactly the size I was working on.
I actually switched right back to photoshop since I know it so well. I'm holding onto GIMP though, just in case. I didn't have any trouble with coloring though, that was pretty straight forward. Most of my trouble was with tool presets. It seemed like there were a lot of things I had to set up manually to get them to work the way I wanted.
I kind of suspected you might.
It's often far easier to do a good job with a tool you're familiar with, especially if you've devoted lots of time and effort into making sure both that it's configured for yourself and that you understand it.
It's why I often get frustrated whenever I have to do a clean OS install.
I spent countless hours installing and configuring things to be just exactly how I want them, then I eventually have to do it all again with a new version of the OS.
It's often far easier to do a good job with a tool you're familiar with, especially if you've devoted lots of time and effort into making sure both that it's configured for yourself and that you understand it.
It's why I often get frustrated whenever I have to do a clean OS install.
I spent countless hours installing and configuring things to be just exactly how I want them, then I eventually have to do it all again with a new version of the OS.
You're lucky on that. Others haven't had it so easy.
I used to use Windows 98SE, and had to reinstall once every blue moon or so.
(haven't had any problems with XP or 7 recently, though)
Though Linux has the advantage that because the vast majority of applications are free, you don't have to fiddle around with license keys and such.
Mostly it's remembering what programs you use and what settings you like.
I used to use Windows 98SE, and had to reinstall once every blue moon or so.
(haven't had any problems with XP or 7 recently, though)
Though Linux has the advantage that because the vast majority of applications are free, you don't have to fiddle around with license keys and such.
Mostly it's remembering what programs you use and what settings you like.
Comments